Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lancaster v. Lancastergreen2 sentences2001Lancaster v. Lancaster, 671 S.W.2d 501, 502 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1984); Hardin v. Hardin, 689 S.W.2d 152, 154 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983). “[T]he trial court is granted broad discretion in adjusting and adjudicating the parties’ interest in all jointly owned property. 2000Lancaster v. Lancaster, 671 S.W.2d 501, 502 (Tenn. Ct. App.1984); Hardin v. Hardin, 689 S.W.2d 152, 154 (Tenn. Ct. App.1983). 10 Tenn. Co de Ann. §3 6-4-121(c) p rovides: In making equitable division of marital property, the court shall consider all relevant factors including: (1) The duration of the marriage; (2) The age, physical and mental health, vocational skills, employability, earning capacity, estate, financial liabilities and financial needs of ea ch of the parties; (3) The tangible or intangible contribution by one (1) party to the education, training or increased earnin g power of t | 3 | 3 |
Hardin v. Hardingreen2 sentences2001Lancaster v. Lancaster, 671 S.W.2d 501, 502 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1984); Hardin v. Hardin, 689 S.W.2d 152, 154 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983). “[T]he trial court is granted broad discretion in adjusting and adjudicating the parties’ interest in all jointly owned property. 2000Lancaster v. Lancaster, 671 S.W.2d 501, 502 (Tenn. Ct. App.1984); Hardin v. Hardin, 689 S.W.2d 152, 154 (Tenn. Ct. App.1983). 10 Tenn. Co de Ann. §3 6-4-121(c) p rovides: In making equitable division of marital property, the court shall consider all relevant factors including: (1) The duration of the marriage; (2) The age, physical and mental health, vocational skills, employability, earning capacity, estate, financial liabilities and financial needs of ea ch of the parties; (3) The tangible or intangible contribution by one (1) party to the education, training or increased earnin g power of t | 3 | 3 |
Paradiso v. Kroger Companygreen1 sentence2014This being the case, we review the evidence in the record that supports a finding of constructive notice under this theory.10 In general, in a premises liability case, the court will consider factors such as “the nature of the existing danger, its source and cause, the size, location and foreseeable consequences as well as the length of time such danger existed.” Howard v. Ammons, 402 S.W.2d 875 , 877- 78 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1965); see also Kirby v. Macon Cnty., No. 01A01-9206-CV-00256, 1993 WL 30616 , at *4 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 10, 1993) (quoting Paradiso v. Kroger Co., 499 S.W.2d 78, 79 (Tenn. C | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Howard v. Ammons
neutral
1 sentence2014This being the case, we review the evidence in the record that supports a finding of constructive notice under this theory.10 In general, in a premises liability case, the court will consider factors such as “the nature of the existing danger, its source and cause, the size, location and foreseeable consequences as well as the length of time such danger existed.” Howard v. Ammons, 402 S.W.2d 875 , 877- 78 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1965); see also Kirby v. Macon Cnty., No. 01A01-9206-CV-00256, 1993 WL 30616 , at *4 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 10, 1993) (quoting Paradiso v. Kroger Co., 499 S.W.2d 78, 79 (Tenn. C | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Faulkner
green
1 sentence2006This Court will consider an instruction prejudicially erroneous “only if the jury charge, when read as a whole, fails to fairly submit the legal issues or misleads the jury as to the applicable law.” Faulkner, 154 S.W.3d at 58 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.