Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1947–2001 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Sullivangreen2 sentences2001See State v. Sullivan, 143 Wash.2d 162 , 180 n. 73, 19 P.3d 1012 (2001); City of Spokane v. Douglass, 115 Wash.2d 171, 176 , 795 P.2d 693 (1990). 2001See State v. Sullivan, 143 Wn.2d 162 , 180 n.73, 19 P.3d 1012 (2001); City of Spokane v. Douglass, 115 Wn.2d 171, 176 , 795 P.2d 693 (1990). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Sullivangreen2 sentences2001See State v. Sullivan, 143 Wash.2d 162 , 180 n. 73, 19 P.3d 1012 (2001); City of Spokane v. Douglass, 115 Wash.2d 171, 176 , 795 P.2d 693 (1990). 2001See State v. Sullivan, 143 Wn.2d 162 , 180 n.73, 19 P.3d 1012 (2001); City of Spokane v. Douglass, 115 Wn.2d 171, 176 , 795 P.2d 693 (1990). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Tuitoelaugreen2 sentences1996In sentencing, as at trial, "it is axiomatic that a party must object and give the trial court an opportunity to rule before this court will consider whether error was committed." Tuitoelau, 64 Wash.App. at 71 , 822 P.2d 1222 . 1996In sentencing, as at trial, "it is axiomatic that a party must object and give the trial court an opportunity to rule before this court will consider whether error was committed.” Tuitoelau, 64 Wn. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Spokane v. Douglass
green
2 sentences2001See State v. Sullivan, 143 Wn.2d 162 , 180 n.73, 19 P.3d 1012 (2001); City of Spokane v. Douglass, 115 Wn.2d 171, 176 , 795 P.2d 693 (1990). 2001See State v. Sullivan, 143 Wn.2d 162 , 180 n.73, 19 P.3d 1012 (2001); City of Spokane v. Douglass, 115 Wn.2d 171, 176 , 795 P.2d 693 (1990). | 2 | 2001–2001 |
State Ex Rel. Rand v. City of Seattle
neutral
1 sentence1947Rand v. Seattle, 13 Wn. (2d) 107, 124 P. (2d) 207 , we held that the omission from appellant’s brief of a definite assignment of error as required by Rule 21 is not fatal, and that this court will consider the error claimed, where the contention that the trial court erred in a particular ruling so conclusively appears from the appellants’ brief that a specific assignment could not more definitely call the alleged error to the attention of the court. | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.