Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1995–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Davis v. Stategreen2 sentences2000See Davis v. State, 7 S.W.3d 695, 696 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] *637 1999, pet. refd) (noting split of authority in courts of appeals and citing cases). 2000See Davis v. State, 7 S.W.3d 695, 696 (Tex. App.--Houston [1 st Dist.] 1999, pet. ref'd) (noting split of authority in courts of appeals and citing cases). | 2 | 2 |
Landers v. State Farm Lloydsgreen1 sentence2024Dyer v. Accredited Home Lenders, Inc., No. 02-11-00046-CV, 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 877 , at *9 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Feb. 2, 2012, pet. denied) (mem. op.) (footnotes omitted). 6 See Cooper v. Litton Loan Serv., LP, 325 S.W.3d 766, 771 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, pet. denied); Landers v. State Farm Lloyds, 257 S.W.3d 740, 746 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2008, no pet.) (“Before the advent of rule 166a(i), it was well settled that summary judgment could not be rendered based on the default of the opposing party.”). 11 If the attachment of evidence to the movant’s hybrid summary judgment motion does n | 1 | 1 |
Cooper v. Litton Loan Servicing, LPgreen1 sentence2024Dyer v. Accredited Home Lenders, Inc., No. 02-11-00046-CV, 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 877 , at *9 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Feb. 2, 2012, pet. denied) (mem. op.) (footnotes omitted). 6 See Cooper v. Litton Loan Serv., LP, 325 S.W.3d 766, 771 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, pet. denied); Landers v. State Farm Lloyds, 257 S.W.3d 740, 746 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2008, no pet.) (“Before the advent of rule 166a(i), it was well settled that summary judgment could not be rendered based on the default of the opposing party.”). 11 If the attachment of evidence to the movant’s hybrid summary judgment motion does n | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences1998The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) firmly established ineffective assistance of counsel as a means for appellate defense attorneys to circumvent the lack of a trial objection to obtain review of errors that deprived an accused of a fair trial. 1998The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) firmly established ineffective assistance of counsel as a means for appellate defense attorneys to circumvent the lack of a trial objection to obtain review of errors that deprived an accused of a fair trial. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Terry v. Ohio
green
2 sentences1995As noted above, the concept of arrest in Terry was the traditional one, i.e., a seizure which eventuated in a trip to the station house and prosecution for crime. 392 U.S. at 16 , 88 S.Ct. at 1877 . 1995As noted above, the concept of arrest in Terry was the traditional one, i.e., a seizure which eventuated in a trip to the station house and prosecution for crime. 392 U.S. at 16 , 88 S.Ct. at 1877 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.