Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2005–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
American Transitional Care Centers of Texas, Inc. v. Palaciosgreen2 sentences2006See Palacios , 46 S.W.3d at 875, 878-79 . 2005American Transitional Care Ctrs. of Texas, Inc. v. Palacios, 46 S.W.3d 873, 879 (Tex. 2001). | 3 | 3 |
Hutchinson v. Montemayorgreen1 sentence2015Fung v. Fischer, 365 S.W.3d 507, 533-34 (Tex.App.- Austin 2012 , no pet.)(opinion was deficient because it turned on assumption unsupported by the report), overruled on other grounds by Certified EMS, Inc. v. Potts, 392 S.W.3d 625 (Tex.2013); Cooper v. Arizpe, 2008 WL 940490 , at *3-4 (Tex.App. –San Antonio 2008, pet. denied)(report was deficient because it relied on the assumption of what was contained in the emergency department chart); Murphy v. Mendoza, 234 S.W.3d 23, 28 (Tex.App. –El Paso 2007, no pet.)(report was deficient because it was based on an assumption that recuts of pathology sl | 1 | 1 |
Fung v. Fischergreen1 sentence2015Fung v. Fischer, 365 S.W.3d 507, 533-34 (Tex.App.- Austin 2012 , no pet.)(opinion was deficient because it turned on assumption unsupported by the report), overruled on other grounds by Certified EMS, Inc. v. Potts, 392 S.W.3d 625 (Tex.2013); Cooper v. Arizpe, 2008 WL 940490 , at *3-4 (Tex.App. –San Antonio 2008, pet. denied)(report was deficient because it relied on the assumption of what was contained in the emergency department chart); Murphy v. Mendoza, 234 S.W.3d 23, 28 (Tex.App. –El Paso 2007, no pet.)(report was deficient because it was based on an assumption that recuts of pathology sl | 1 | 1 |
Murphy v. Mendozagreen1 sentence2015Fung v. Fischer, 365 S.W.3d 507, 533-34 (Tex.App.- Austin 2012 , no pet.)(opinion was deficient because it turned on assumption unsupported by the report), overruled on other grounds by Certified EMS, Inc. v. Potts, 392 S.W.3d 625 (Tex.2013); Cooper v. Arizpe, 2008 WL 940490 , at *3-4 (Tex.App. –San Antonio 2008, pet. denied)(report was deficient because it relied on the assumption of what was contained in the emergency department chart); Murphy v. Mendoza, 234 S.W.3d 23, 28 (Tex.App. –El Paso 2007, no pet.)(report was deficient because it was based on an assumption that recuts of pathology sl | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Certified Ems, Inc. D/B/A Cpns Staffing v. Cherie Potts
green
1 sentence2015Fung v. Fischer, 365 S.W.3d 507, 533-34 (Tex.App.- Austin 2012 , no pet.)(opinion was deficient because it turned on assumption unsupported by the report), overruled on other grounds by Certified EMS, Inc. v. Potts, 392 S.W.3d 625 (Tex.2013); Cooper v. Arizpe, 2008 WL 940490 , at *3-4 (Tex.App. –San Antonio 2008, pet. denied)(report was deficient because it relied on the assumption of what was contained in the emergency department chart); Murphy v. Mendoza, 234 S.W.3d 23, 28 (Tex.App. –El Paso 2007, no pet.)(report was deficient because it was based on an assumption that recuts of pathology sl | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Certified EMS, Inc. v. Potts
green
1 sentence2012Potts, 355 S.W.3d at 692 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |