continuous warning (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

continuous warning in Texas

5 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1915–2001 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
cluster 14730green
· · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
2 sentences

2001See Celestine , 266 F.3d at 352 ; Huckabay 142 F.3d at 240 .

2001See id. at 240 .

12
Celestine v. Petroleos De Venezuella SAgreen
ca5 · 2001 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
1 sentence

2001See Celestine , 266 F.3d at 352 ; Huckabay 142 F.3d at 240 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
Evans v. State green
texcrimapp · 1968
2 sentences

1973E.g., Jackson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 491 S.W.2d 155 ; Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 489 S.W.2d 890 ; Young v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 488 S.W.2d 92 ; Vines v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 479 S.W.2d 322 ; Miller v. State, supra; McClain v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 432 S.W.2d 73 ; Evans v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 430 S.W.2d 502 ; Williams v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 418 S.W.2d 837 .

1973E.g., Jackson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 491 S.W.2d 155 ; Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 489 S.W.2d 890 ; Young v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 488 S.W.2d 92 ; Vines v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 479 S.W. 2d 322 ; Miller v. State, supra; McClain v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 432 S.W.2d 73 ; Evans v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 430 S.W.2d 502 ; Williams v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 418 S.W. 2d 837 .

11973–1973
Jackson v. State green
texcrimapp · 1973
2 sentences

1973E.g., Jackson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 491 S.W.2d 155 ; Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 489 S.W.2d 890 ; Young v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 488 S.W.2d 92 ; Vines v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 479 S.W.2d 322 ; Miller v. State, supra; McClain v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 432 S.W.2d 73 ; Evans v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 430 S.W.2d 502 ; Williams v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 418 S.W.2d 837 .

1973E.g., Jackson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 491 S.W.2d 155 ; Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 489 S.W.2d 890 ; Young v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 488 S.W.2d 92 ; Vines v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 479 S.W. 2d 322 ; Miller v. State, supra; McClain v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 432 S.W.2d 73 ; Evans v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 430 S.W.2d 502 ; Williams v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 418 S.W. 2d 837 .

11973–1973
McClain v. State green
texcrimapp · 1968
2 sentences

1973E.g., Jackson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 491 S.W.2d 155 ; Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 489 S.W.2d 890 ; Young v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 488 S.W.2d 92 ; Vines v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 479 S.W.2d 322 ; Miller v. State, supra; McClain v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 432 S.W.2d 73 ; Evans v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 430 S.W.2d 502 ; Williams v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 418 S.W.2d 837 .

1973E.g., Jackson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 491 S.W.2d 155 ; Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 489 S.W.2d 890 ; Young v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 488 S.W.2d 92 ; Vines v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 479 S.W. 2d 322 ; Miller v. State, supra; McClain v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 432 S.W.2d 73 ; Evans v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 430 S.W.2d 502 ; Williams v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 418 S.W. 2d 837 .

11973–1973
Vines v. State green
texcrimapp · 1972
2 sentences

1973E.g., Jackson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 491 S.W.2d 155 ; Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 489 S.W.2d 890 ; Young v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 488 S.W.2d 92 ; Vines v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 479 S.W.2d 322 ; Miller v. State, supra; McClain v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 432 S.W.2d 73 ; Evans v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 430 S.W.2d 502 ; Williams v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 418 S.W.2d 837 .

1973E.g., Jackson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 491 S.W.2d 155 ; Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 489 S.W.2d 890 ; Young v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 488 S.W.2d 92 ; Vines v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 479 S.W. 2d 322 ; Miller v. State, supra; McClain v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 432 S.W.2d 73 ; Evans v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 430 S.W.2d 502 ; Williams v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 418 S.W. 2d 837 .

11973–1973
Young v. State green
texcrimapp · 1972
2 sentences

1973E.g., Jackson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 491 S.W.2d 155 ; Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 489 S.W.2d 890 ; Young v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 488 S.W.2d 92 ; Vines v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 479 S.W.2d 322 ; Miller v. State, supra; McClain v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 432 S.W.2d 73 ; Evans v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 430 S.W.2d 502 ; Williams v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 418 S.W.2d 837 .

1973E.g., Jackson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 491 S.W.2d 155 ; Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 489 S.W.2d 890 ; Young v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 488 S.W.2d 92 ; Vines v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 479 S.W. 2d 322 ; Miller v. State, supra; McClain v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 432 S.W.2d 73 ; Evans v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 430 S.W.2d 502 ; Williams v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 418 S.W. 2d 837 .

11973–1973
Taylor v. State green
texcrimapp · 1973
2 sentences

1973E.g., Jackson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 491 S.W.2d 155 ; Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 489 S.W.2d 890 ; Young v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 488 S.W.2d 92 ; Vines v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 479 S.W.2d 322 ; Miller v. State, supra; McClain v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 432 S.W.2d 73 ; Evans v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 430 S.W.2d 502 ; Williams v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 418 S.W.2d 837 .

1973E.g., Jackson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 491 S.W.2d 155 ; Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 489 S.W.2d 890 ; Young v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 488 S.W.2d 92 ; Vines v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 479 S.W. 2d 322 ; Miller v. State, supra; McClain v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 432 S.W.2d 73 ; Evans v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 430 S.W.2d 502 ; Williams v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 418 S.W. 2d 837 .

11973–1973
Williams v. State neutral
texcrimapp · 1967
2 sentences

1973E.g., Jackson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 491 S.W.2d 155 ; Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 489 S.W.2d 890 ; Young v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 488 S.W.2d 92 ; Vines v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 479 S.W.2d 322 ; Miller v. State, supra; McClain v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 432 S.W.2d 73 ; Evans v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 430 S.W.2d 502 ; Williams v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 418 S.W.2d 837 .

1973E.g., Jackson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 491 S.W.2d 155 ; Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 489 S.W.2d 890 ; Young v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 488 S.W.2d 92 ; Vines v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 479 S.W. 2d 322 ; Miller v. State, supra; McClain v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 432 S.W.2d 73 ; Evans v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 430 S.W.2d 502 ; Williams v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 418 S.W. 2d 837 .

11973–1973
Janus Films, Inc. v. City of Fort Worth green
tex · 1962
2 sentences

1970Under these circumstances, it cannot be said that the continuous violation of the agreement by Dr. Huff constituted “the last, actual, peaceable, noncon-tested status which preceded the pending controversy.” Janus Films, Inc. v. City of Fort Worth, 163 Tex. 616 , 358 S.W.2d 589 (1962).

1970Under these circumstances, it cannot be said that the continuous violation of the agreement by Dr. Huff constituted “the last, actual, peaceable, noncon-tested status which preceded the pending controversy.” Janus Films, Inc. v. City of Fort Worth, 163 Tex. 616 , 358 S.W.2d 589 (1962).

11970–1970
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Bailey neutral
· 1892
2 sentences

1915St. 1911, art. 6564) says that: “The whistle shall be blown and the bell rung at the distance of at least eighty rods from the place where the railroad shall cross any public road or street, and such bell shall be kept ringing until it shall have crossed such public road, or stopped.” Chief Justice Fisher held in the case cited (Railway Co. v. Hall, supra) that, though the start was made within less than 80 rods of the crossing, there should be a continuous warning by ringing the bell in approaching tho crossing, although the statutory requirement as to the whistle did not apply, citing the ca

1915St. 1911, art. 6564) says that: “The whistle shall be blown and the bell rung at the distance of at least eighty rods from the place where the railroad shall cross any public road or street, and such bell shall be kept ringing until it shall have crossed such public road, or stopped.” Chief Justice Fisher held in the case cited (Railway Co. v. Hall, supra) that, though the start was made within less than 80 rods of the crossing, there should be a continuous warning by ringing the bell in approaching tho crossing, although the statutory requirement as to the whistle did not apply, citing the ca

11915–1915

Where else courts name it

NY 20 (1928–2025) OH 7 (1974–2018) CA 7 (1916–2021) IL 6 (1980–2026) TX 5 (1915–2001) NJ 5 (1994–2020) MA 3 (1949–2017) NE 2 (1947–1958)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check