Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
O'NEIL v. MacK Trucks, Inc.green2 sentences1992O’Neil v. Mack Trucks, Inc., 542 S.W.2d 112, 114 (Tex.1976). 1992O'Neil v. Mack Trucks, Inc. , 542 S.W.2d 112, 114 (Tex. 1976). | 2 | 2 |
Emerita Medina, Kianna Paz, and Remmy Matute v. Gloria Ravengreen1 sentence2022See Medina, 492 S.W.3d at 60 (withdrawal of admissions and new trial are proper remedy). | 1 | 1 |
Villanueva v. Gonzalezgreen1 sentence2008See Villanueva, 123 S.W.3d at 463-64 (holding claims for breach of fiduciary duty and fraud failed because they arose out of an illegal contract that violated the occupation code); see also Saks v. Sawtelle, Goode, Davidson, & Troilo, 880 S.W.2d 466, 469 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1994, writ denied) (“It may be assumed, as undisputed doctrine, that no action will lie to recover a claim for damages, if to establish it the plaintiff requires aid from an illegal transaction, or is under the necessity of showing or in any manner depending upon an illegal act to which he is a party.”) (citing Gulf v. Jo | 1 | 1 |
Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Johnsongreen1 sentence2008See Villanueva, 123 S.W.3d at 463-64 (holding claims for breach of fiduciary duty and fraud failed because they arose out of an illegal contract that violated the occupation code); see also Saks v. Sawtelle, Goode, Davidson, & Troilo, 880 S.W.2d 466, 469 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1994, writ denied) (“It may be assumed, as undisputed doctrine, that no action will lie to recover a claim for damages, if to establish it the plaintiff requires aid from an illegal transaction, or is under the necessity of showing or in any manner depending upon an illegal act to which he is a party.”) (citing Gulf v. Jo | 1 | 1 |
Saks v. Sawtelle, Goode, Davidson & Troilogreen1 sentence2008See Villanueva, 123 S.W.3d at 463-64 (holding claims for breach of fiduciary duty and fraud failed because they arose out of an illegal contract that violated the occupation code); see also Saks v. Sawtelle, Goode, Davidson, & Troilo, 880 S.W.2d 466, 469 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1994, writ denied) (“It may be assumed, as undisputed doctrine, that no action will lie to recover a claim for damages, if to establish it the plaintiff requires aid from an illegal transaction, or is under the necessity of showing or in any manner depending upon an illegal act to which he is a party.”) (citing Gulf v. Jo | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
American Airlines Employees Federal Credit Union v. Martin
green
1 sentence2000In its opinion, the Court recognizes that one purpose of the Uniform Commercial Code is "`to make uniform the law among the various jurisdictions.'" 29 S.W.3d at 93 (quoting TEX. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.