Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1961–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
El Chico Corp. v. Poolered1 sentence2022But that is true only because the Tex. Home Mgmt., Inc. v. Peavy, 89 S.W.3d 30, 34 (Tex. 2002) (quoting 65 El Chico Corp. v. Poole, 732 S.W.2d 306, 311 (Tex. 1987)); Hous. | 1 | 1 |
Texas Home Management, Inc. v. Peavygreen1 sentence2022But that is true only because the Tex. Home Mgmt., Inc. v. Peavy, 89 S.W.3d 30, 34 (Tex. 2002) (quoting 65 El Chico Corp. v. Poole, 732 S.W.2d 306, 311 (Tex. 1987)); Hous. | 1 | 1 |
Kelly McClane v. New Caney Oaks Apartmentsgreen1 sentence2016See McClane, 416 S.W.3d at 121 . . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Houston v. Cotton
green
1 sentence2023Put another way, the “employee must have a good-faith belief that a law, which in fact exists, was violated.” City of Houston v. Cotton, 171 S.W.3d 541 , 547 n.10 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, pet. denied) (citing 22 Llanes v. Corpus Christi Indep. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
City of Keller v. Wilson
green
1 sentence2016See ante at 90-91, 95-96 & n. 6, If the majority bases its disposition of the fourth issue on the former analysis (suggested in footnote 6); the majority still relies on Mr. Day Rents’s lack of legal representation at trial for an essential part of its analysis without any preservation of error in the trial court. .See City of Keller, 168 S.W.3d at 827 . .. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Rudes v. Gottschalk
green
2 sentences1962The careful trial court here submitted the issues of “ordinary care” as applied to Sandra Ledbetter, and “proximate cause”, under definitions that are in compliance with those set ou in the Supreme Court holding in Rudes v. Gottschalk, 159 Tex. 552 , 324 S.W.2d 201 . 1962The careful trial court here submitted the issues of “ordinary care” as applied to Sandra Ledbetter, and “proximate cause”, under definitions that are in compliance with those set ou in the Supreme Court holding in Rudes v. Gottschalk, 159 Tex. 552 , 324 S.W.2d 201 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Little Rock Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. Dunn
green
1 sentence1962Co. v. Dunn, Tex.Civ.App., 222 S.W.2d 985 , wherein it is held that proximate causation is an essential part of a defense of contributory negligence. | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Wells, Fargo & Co. v. Benjamin
green
2 sentences1961Koons v. Rook, Tex.Com.App., 295 S.W. 592 ; Wells Fargo & Co. v. Benjamin, 107 Tex. 331 , 179 S.W. 513 ; Dunn v. Texas Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Tex.Civ.App., 84 S.W.2d 545 , writ dismissed. 1961Koons v. Rook, Tex.Com.App., 295 S.W. 592 ; Wells Fargo & Co. v. Benjamin, 107 Tex. 331 , 179 S.W. 513 ; Dunn v. Texas Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Tex.Civ.App., 84 S.W.2d 545 , writ dismissed. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Dunn v. Texas Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
green
1 sentence1961Koons v. Rook, Tex.Com.App., 295 S.W. 592 ; Wells Fargo & Co. v. Benjamin, 107 Tex. 331 , 179 S.W. 513 ; Dunn v. Texas Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Tex.Civ.App., 84 S.W.2d 545 , writ dismissed. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Koons v. Rook
green
1 sentence1961Koons v. Rook, Tex.Com.App., 295 S.W. 592 ; Wells Fargo & Co. v. Benjamin, 107 Tex. 331 , 179 S.W. 513 ; Dunn v. Texas Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Tex.Civ.App., 84 S.W.2d 545 , writ dismissed. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.