evidence nor the applicable standard (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

evidence nor the applicable standard in Texas

8 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2009–2010 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Chavero v. Stategreen
texapp · 2001 · cited in 8 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2009–2010
2 sentences

2010App. 2000) (conducting only a legal sufficiency review when appellant made no reference to the factual sufficiency of the evidence nor the applicable standard); Chavero v. State , 36 S.W.3d 688, 693 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2001, no pet.) (en banc) (conducting only a legal sufficiency review when defendant argued only that his “conviction should be vacated and a judgment of acquittal entered because there was insufficient evidence to establish all of the necessary elements” of the offense but failed to reference factual sufficiency or the applicable standard of review).

2010See Cardenas v. State , 30 S.W.3d 384 , 386 n.2 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000) (conducting only a legal sufficiency review when appellant made no reference to the factual sufficiency of the evidence nor the applicable standard); Chavero v. State , 36 S.W.3d 688, 693 (Tex. App. C Corpus Christi 2001, no pet.) (en banc) (conducting only a legal sufficiency review when defendant argued only that his A conviction should be vacated and a judgment of acquittal entered because there was insufficient evidence to establish all of the necessary elements @ of the offense but failed to reference factual sufficien

88
Cardenas v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 2000 · cited in 3 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2009–2010
2 sentences

2010See Cardenas v. State , 30 S.W.3d 384 , 386 n.2 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000) (conducting only a legal sufficiency review when appellant made no reference to the factual sufficiency of the evidence nor the applicable standard); Chavero v. State , 36 S.W.3d 688, 693 (Tex. App. C Corpus Christi 2001, no pet.) (en banc) (conducting only a legal sufficiency review when defendant argued only that his A conviction should be vacated and a judgment of acquittal entered because there was insufficient evidence to establish all of the necessary elements @ of the offense but failed to reference factual sufficien

2009See Cardenas v. State , 30 S.W.3d 384 , 386 n.2 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000) (conducting only a legal sufficiency review when defendant, despite having requested A [i]n a single sentence at the conclusion of his [sufficiency of the evidence] point of error . . . that [the court] conduct a factual sufficiency review, @ otherwise made no reference to the factual sufficiency of the evidence nor the applicable standard); Chavero v. State , 36 S.W.3d 688, 693 (Tex. App. C Corpus Christi 2001, no pet.) (conducting only a legal sufficiency review when defendant argued only that his A conviction should be v

33

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check