Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2011–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control Boardgreen2 sentences2011City of Galveston v. State, 217 S.W.3d 466, 468 (Tex.2007); see also Texas Dep’t of Transp. v. Jones, 8 S.W.3d 636, 638 (Tex.1999) (per curiam) ("Since as early as 1847, the law in Texas has been that absent the state’s consent to suit, a trial court lacks subject matter jurisdiction."); Texas Ass’n of Bus. v. Texas Air Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440, 445 (Tex.1993) (subject-matter jurisdiction may be raised for the first time on appeal and cannot be waived). 21 . 2011City of Galveston v. State, 217 S.W.3d 466, 468 (Tex.2007); see also Texas Dep’t of Transp. v. Jones, 8 S.W.3d 636, 638 (Tex.1999) (per curiam) ("Since as early as 1847, the law in Texas has been that absent the state’s consent to suit, a trial court lacks subject matter jurisdiction."); Texas Ass’n of Bus. v. Texas Air Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440, 445 (Tex.1993) (subject-matter jurisdiction may be raised for the first time on appeal and cannot be waived). 21 . | 2 | 2 |
Texas Department of Insurance v. Reconveyance Services, Inc.green2 sentences2011See Texas Dep't of Ins. v. Reconveyance Servs., Inc. , 306 S.W.3d 256 (Tex. 2010) (applying analysis from Heinrich to case in which party sought declaration that it may charge fee to individuals purchasing new homes); Texas Dep't of Licensing & Regulation v. Roosters MGC, LLC , No. 03-09-00253-CV, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 4392 (Tex. App.--Austin June 10, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.) (employing Heinrich analysis in case in which party sought declaration that occupations code does not prohibit licensed cosmetologists from using safety razors for shaving customers' faces); see also Texans Uniting for Re 2011See Texas Dep’t of Ins. v. Reconveyance Servs., Inc., 306 S.W.3d 256 (Tex. 2010) (applying analysis from Heinrich to case in which party sought declaration that it may charge fee to individuals purchasing new homes); Texas Dep’t of Licensing & Regulation v. Roosters MGC, LLC, No. 03-09-00253-CV, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 4392 (Tex. App.—Austin June 10, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.) (employing Heinrich analysis in case in which party sought declaration that occupations code does not prohibit licensed cosmetologists from using safety razors for shaving customers’ faces); see also Texans Uniting for Refor | 2 | 2 |
City of Galveston v. Stategreen2 sentences2011City of Galveston v. State, 217 S.W.3d 466, 468 (Tex.2007); see also Texas Dep’t of Transp. v. Jones, 8 S.W.3d 636, 638 (Tex.1999) (per curiam) ("Since as early as 1847, the law in Texas has been that absent the state’s consent to suit, a trial court lacks subject matter jurisdiction."); Texas Ass’n of Bus. v. Texas Air Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440, 445 (Tex.1993) (subject-matter jurisdiction may be raised for the first time on appeal and cannot be waived). 21 . 2011City of Galveston v. State, 217 S.W.3d 466, 468 (Tex.2007); see also Texas Dep’t of Transp. v. Jones, 8 S.W.3d 636, 638 (Tex.1999) (per curiam) ("Since as early as 1847, the law in Texas has been that absent the state’s consent to suit, a trial court lacks subject matter jurisdiction."); Texas Ass’n of Bus. v. Texas Air Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440, 445 (Tex.1993) (subject-matter jurisdiction may be raised for the first time on appeal and cannot be waived). 21 . | 2 | 2 |
Texas Department of Transportation v. Jonesgreen2 sentences2011City of Galveston v. State, 217 S.W.3d 466, 468 (Tex.2007); see also Texas Dep’t of Transp. v. Jones, 8 S.W.3d 636, 638 (Tex.1999) (per curiam) ("Since as early as 1847, the law in Texas has been that absent the state’s consent to suit, a trial court lacks subject matter jurisdiction."); Texas Ass’n of Bus. v. Texas Air Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440, 445 (Tex.1993) (subject-matter jurisdiction may be raised for the first time on appeal and cannot be waived). 21 . 2011City of Galveston v. State, 217 S.W.3d 466, 468 (Tex.2007); see also Texas Dep’t of Transp. v. Jones, 8 S.W.3d 636, 638 (Tex.1999) (per curiam) ("Since as early as 1847, the law in Texas has been that absent the state’s consent to suit, a trial court lacks subject matter jurisdiction."); Texas Ass’n of Bus. v. Texas Air Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440, 445 (Tex.1993) (subject-matter jurisdiction may be raised for the first time on appeal and cannot be waived). 21 . | 2 | 2 |
Texans Uniting for Reform & Freedom v. Saenzgreen2 sentences2011See Texas Dep't of Ins. v. Reconveyance Servs., Inc. , 306 S.W.3d 256 (Tex. 2010) (applying analysis from Heinrich to case in which party sought declaration that it may charge fee to individuals purchasing new homes); Texas Dep't of Licensing & Regulation v. Roosters MGC, LLC , No. 03-09-00253-CV, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 4392 (Tex. App.--Austin June 10, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.) (employing Heinrich analysis in case in which party sought declaration that occupations code does not prohibit licensed cosmetologists from using safety razors for shaving customers' faces); see also Texans Uniting for Re 2011See Texas Dep’t of Ins. v. Reconveyance Servs., Inc., 306 S.W.3d 256 (Tex. 2010) (applying analysis from Heinrich to case in which party sought declaration that it may charge fee to individuals purchasing new homes); Texas Dep’t of Licensing & Regulation v. Roosters MGC, LLC, No. 03-09-00253-CV, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 4392 (Tex. App.—Austin June 10, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.) (employing Heinrich analysis in case in which party sought declaration that occupations code does not prohibit licensed cosmetologists from using safety razors for shaving customers’ faces); see also Texans Uniting for Refor | 2 | 2 |
City of McKinney v. Hank's Restaurant Group, L.P.green2 sentences2015Group, L.P., 412 S.W.3d 102, 112 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2013, no pet.); Harvel v. Tex. Dep't of Ins.-Div. of Workers' Comp., 13-14-00095- CV, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 5159 , 2015 WL 2452703 (Tex. App. Corpus Christi- -May 21, 2015, motion for rehearing to be filed) (13th Court of Appeals determined sovereign immunity bars the claims against state agency and that a Heinrich challenge was not alleged.). 12 No. 03-14-00808-CV Rosendo Morales Appellant’s Brief 2. 2015Group, L.P., 412 S.W.3d 102, 112 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2013, no pet.); Harvel v. Tex. Dep't of Ins.-Div. of Workers' Comp., 13-14-00095- CV, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 5159 , 2015 WL 2452703 (Tex. App. Corpus Christi- -May 21, 2015, motion for rehearing to be filed) (13th Court of Appeals determined sovereign immunity bars the claims against state agency and that a Heinrich challenge was not alleged.). 12 No. 03-14-00808-CV Rosendo Morales Appellant’s Brief 2. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||