Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2015–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cosio v. Stategreen2 sentences2024See Arrington, 451 S.W.3d at 844 (treating factor as neutral when arguments of counsel neither contributed to nor ameliorated error in the charge); Wesley, 2021 WL 5931677 , at *4 (similar); cf. Cosio, 353 S.W.3d at 777 (weighing arguments of counsel against egregious harm because “neither of the parties nor the trial judge added to the charge errors by telling the jury that it did not have to be unanimous about the specific instance of criminal conduct”); Young, 2020 WL 1695511 , at *3 (weighing arguments of counsel against egregious harm when counsel did not exacerbate charge error and lack 2015Admittedly, in Cosio , the Court of Criminal Appeals determined Cosio was not harmed by the trial court’s failure to give an incident-unanimity instruction. 353 S.W.3d at 777-78 . | 1 | 3 |
State v. Martinez-Sanchezgreen1 sentence2026See State v. Martinez-Sanchez, 563 So.2d 509, 513 (La. | 1 | 1 |
Arrington, Charlesgreen1 sentence2024See Arrington, 451 S.W.3d at 844 (treating factor as neutral when arguments of counsel neither contributed to nor ameliorated error in the charge); Wesley, 2021 WL 5931677 , at *4 (similar); cf. Cosio, 353 S.W.3d at 777 (weighing arguments of counsel against egregious harm because “neither of the parties nor the trial judge added to the charge errors by telling the jury that it did not have to be unanimous about the specific instance of criminal conduct”); Young, 2020 WL 1695511 , at *3 (weighing arguments of counsel against egregious harm when counsel did not exacerbate charge error and lack | 1 | 1 |
Reeves, Gary Patrickgreen1 sentence2015See Reeves, 420 S.W.3d at 816 ; Ngo, 175 S.W.3d at 743 ; Ochoa, 119 S.W.3d at 828 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re MP
green
2 sentences2015Because the same outcome would have resulted no matter if the incident-unanimity instruction had been given or not, appellant has suffered no harm.3 3 But see In re M.P., 126 S.W.3d 228 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.) (holding otherwise). 20 IV. 2015Id. at 231-32 . | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Ngo v. State
green
1 sentence2015See Reeves, 420 S.W.3d at 816 ; Ngo, 175 S.W.3d at 743 ; Ochoa, 119 S.W.3d at 828 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Ochoa v. State
green
1 sentence2015See Reeves, 420 S.W.3d at 816 ; Ngo, 175 S.W.3d at 743 ; Ochoa, 119 S.W.3d at 828 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |