Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2006–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Preiser v. Rodriguezgreen2 sentences2011See Preiser v. Rodriguez , 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973) (holding that the sole remedy in federal court for a prisoner seeking restoration of good-time credits is a writ of habeas corpus); Alexander v. Ware , 714 F.2d 416, 419 (5th Cir. 1983); Ex parte Brager , 704 S.W.2d 46, 46 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986) (en banc) (concluding that Texas state courts will not entertain habeas actions challenging violations of prison disciplinary procedures); see also Eldridge , 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 6338 , at *2-9. 2011See Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973) (holding that the sole remedy in federal court for a prisoner seeking restoration of good-time credits is a writ of habeas corpus); Alexander v. Ware, 714 F.2d 416, 419 (5th Cir. 1983); Ex parte Brager, 704 S.W.2d 46, 46 (Tex. Crim. | 7 | 7 |
Ex Parte Bragergreen2 sentences2011See Preiser v. Rodriguez , 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973) (holding that the sole remedy in federal court for a prisoner seeking restoration of good-time credits is a writ of habeas corpus); Alexander v. Ware , 714 F.2d 416, 419 (5th Cir. 1983); Ex parte Brager , 704 S.W.2d 46, 46 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986) (en banc) (concluding that Texas state courts will not entertain habeas actions challenging violations of prison disciplinary procedures); see also Eldridge , 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 6338 , at *2-9. 2011See Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973) (holding that the sole remedy in federal court for a prisoner seeking restoration of good-time credits is a writ of habeas corpus); Alexander v. Ware, 714 F.2d 416, 419 (5th Cir. 1983); Ex parte Brager, 704 S.W.2d 46, 46 (Tex. Crim. | 7 | 7 |
Charlie Alexander v. Glenn Waregreen2 sentences2011See Preiser v. Rodriguez , 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973) (holding that the sole remedy in federal court for a prisoner seeking restoration of good-time credits is a writ of habeas corpus); Alexander v. Ware , 714 F.2d 416, 419 (5th Cir. 1983); Ex parte Brager , 704 S.W.2d 46, 46 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986) (en banc) (concluding that Texas state courts will not entertain habeas actions challenging violations of prison disciplinary procedures); see also Eldridge , 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 6338 , at *2-9. 2011See Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973) (holding that the sole remedy in federal court for a prisoner seeking restoration of good-time credits is a writ of habeas corpus); Alexander v. Ware, 714 F.2d 416, 419 (5th Cir. 1983); Ex parte Brager, 704 S.W.2d 46, 46 (Tex. Crim. | 5 | 5 |
Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.green1 sentence2011Lewis v. Johnson, 97 S.W.3d 885, 887 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.); see Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc., 701 S.W.2d 238, 241-42 (Tex. 1985); see also Eldridge, 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 6338 , at *2-9. 4 Moreover, it is well settled that if an inmate wishes to challenge a disciplinary conviction or punishment that he receives while he is incarcerated, as in this case, he must file a habeas corpus action in federal court. | 1 | 1 |
Lewis v. Johnsongreen1 sentence2011Lewis v. Johnson, 97 S.W.3d 885, 887 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.); see Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc., 701 S.W.2d 238, 241-42 (Tex. 1985); see also Eldridge, 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 6338 , at *2-9. 4 Moreover, it is well settled that if an inmate wishes to challenge a disciplinary conviction or punishment that he receives while he is incarcerated, as in this case, he must file a habeas corpus action in federal court. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.