Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1938–1993 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Warren v. Stategreen2 sentences1988A defendant is entitled upon timely request to an instruction on every affirmative defense raised by the evidence, “regardless of whether it is strong, feeble, unim-peached, or contradicted, and even if the trial court is of the opinion that the testimony is not entitled to belief." Warren v. State, 565 S.W.2d 931, 933 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); see also Horne v. State, 607 S.W.2d 556 (Tex.Cr.App.1980). 1984A defendant is entitled upon timely request to an instruction on every affirmative defense raised by the evidence, “regardless of whether it is strong, feeble, unimpeached, or contradicted, and even if the trial court is of the opinion that the testimony is not entitled to belief.” Warren v. State, 565 S.W.2d 931, 933 , (Tex.Cr.App.1978); see also Home v. State, 607 S.W.2d 556 (Tex.Cr.App.1980). | 3 | 4 |
Horne v. Stategreen2 sentences1988A defendant is entitled upon timely request to an instruction on every affirmative defense raised by the evidence, “regardless of whether it is strong, feeble, unim-peached, or contradicted, and even if the trial court is of the opinion that the testimony is not entitled to belief." Warren v. State, 565 S.W.2d 931, 933 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); see also Horne v. State, 607 S.W.2d 556 (Tex.Cr.App.1980). 1984A defendant is entitled upon timely request to an instruction on every affirmative defense raised by the evidence, “regardless of whether it is strong, feeble, unimpeached, or contradicted, and even if the trial court is of the opinion that the testimony is not entitled to belief.” Warren v. State, 565 S.W.2d 931, 933 , (Tex.Cr.App.1978); see also Home v. State, 607 S.W.2d 556 (Tex.Cr.App.1980). | 2 | 2 |
Dyson v. Stategreen1 sentence1986Dyson v. State, 672 S.W.2d 460, 463 (Tex.Crim.App.1984); Warren v. State, 565 S.W.2d 931, 933-934 (Tex.Crim.App.1978). | 1 | 1 |
Kibbe v. Stategreen1 sentence1938See Kibbe v. State, 112 S. W. (2d) 733 , and cases there cited. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.