issue was reversible error (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

issue was reversible error in Texas

5 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1936–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Jordan v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1978 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
2 sentences

1993Id. at 474 .

1993In determining that the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury on the issue was reversible error, the Stone court relied on the mandatory language which was used in Jordan v. State, 562 S.W.2d 472, 473 (Tex.Cr.App.1978), as the basis for its holding that reversible error was committed when the trial court refused to instruct the jury on the issue of the legality of the search and seizure.

11
Williamson v. Johnsonred
texapp · 1973 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1974–1974
1 sentence

1974Williamson v. Johnson, 492 S.W.2d 327, 330 (Tex.Civ.App.-Tyler 1973, n. w. h.).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Ray v. State green
texapp · 1988
1 sentence

2015In Ray v. State, 749 S.W. 2d 939 , (Tex. App.- San Antonio 1998, pet. ref‘d), the San Antonio Court held differently.

12015–2015
Stevener v. Milano neutral
texapp · 1923
1 sentence

1968In Stevener v. Milano, 256 S.W. 639 (Tex.Civ.App. n. w. h.), the appellant requested the court to submit the following issue: “Was Josie Milano possessed of property within this state subject to execution sufficient to pay her existing debts after she conveyed her interest in the Ben Dragna estate to Lenora Milano ?” The appellate court, after determining that the conveyance was voluntary, held that the refusal to submit this issue was reversible error.

11968–1968
St. Louis, S. F. & T. Ry. Co. v. Ussery neutral
texapp · 1924
1 sentence

1936App.) 259 S.W. 275, 277 , and many other similar holdings. ■ This court held in the case of Texas Employers’ Insurance Association v. Ray (Tex.Civ.App.) 68 S.W. (2d) 290 , that the words “hardship” and “injustice” were not synonymous, and that both elements must be proven and submitted to the jury, “and the omission of the latter from the issue was reversible error; but it will be observed the question of multifariousness of the issue, if both elements had been submitted in one issue, was not considered by the court.

11936–1936
Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Ray green
texapp · 1933
1 sentence

1936App.) 259 S.W. 275, 277 , and many other similar holdings. ■ This court held in the case of Texas Employers’ Insurance Association v. Ray (Tex.Civ.App.) 68 S.W. (2d) 290 , that the words “hardship” and “injustice” were not synonymous, and that both elements must be proven and submitted to the jury, “and the omission of the latter from the issue was reversible error; but it will be observed the question of multifariousness of the issue, if both elements had been submitted in one issue, was not considered by the court.

11936–1936

Where else courts name it

TX 5 (1936–2015) AZ 2 (1976–1979)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check