Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2001–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gonzalez v. Stategreen2 sentences2015See Gonzalez, 8 S.W.3d at 645 ; Roy, 76 S.W.3d at 94 . 2015See Gonzalez, 8 S.W.3d at 645 ; Roy, 76 S.W.3d at 94 . | 2 | 2 |
Philip Wade Ellison v. Stategreen1 sentence2024With regard to the first prong, an appellant is burdened with “presenting the necessary record rather than meeting the burden of demonstrating from the face of the record already before the appellate court that an undisputed double jeopardy violation was involved.” Ellison v. State, 425 S.W.3d 637, 643 (Tex. App.—Houston 2014, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
Parrish v. Stategreen1 sentence2001While this may well place the burden on the appellant, the language used is somewhat indicative of bringing forward the necessary record rather than meeting the burden of demonstrating from the face of the record already before the appellate court that an undisputed double jeopardy violation was involved. 13 U.S. 299 , 304 (1932); Parrish v. State, 869 S.W.2d 352, 354 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994); Tex. Code Crim. Proc. | 1 | 1 |
Missouri v. Huntergreen1 sentence2001Ann. art. 37.09 (West 1981); see also Missouri v. Hunter, 459 U.S. 359, 366 (1983). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Roy v. State
green
2 sentences2015See Gonzalez, 8 S.W.3d at 645 ; Roy, 76 S.W.3d at 94 . 2014With regard to the first prong, we have stated that an appellant “has the burden of presenting the necessary record rather than meeting the burden of demonstrating from the face of the record already before the appellate court that an undisputed double jeopardy violation was involved.” Id. at 94 . | 3 | 2014–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.