valid ground exception (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

valid ground exception in Texas

5 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1960–1995 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Green v. State green
texcrimapp · 1974
2 sentences

1995Green v. State, 510 S.W.2d 919 , Tex.Cr.App.

1977Green v. State, 510 S.W.2d 919 , Tex.Cr.App.

21977–1995
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Railroad Commission green
texapp · 1933
1 sentence

1968The parties, in that event, are relegated to their rights as they existed prior to the creation of such situation. [Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Railroad Commission et al. [Tex.Civ.App.], 68 S.W.2d 625 ].’ Under the rule as stated in the above quotation, it is too plain to admit of debate that any right that this 2.35-acre tract can have to this well to prevent confiscation must be relegated to the rights of the 6.88-acre tract out of which it was subdivided subsequent to the spacing rule.” The Court also stated in such opinion that “subdivisions of land, as such, which have or hereafter may c

11968–1968
Solis v. Martinez green
texapp · 1954
2 sentences

1961Solis v. Martinez, supra. Inasmuch as the case was tried upon a wrong theory and was not fully developed, the judgment will be reversed and the contest remanded for a new trial.

1961Solis v. Martinez, supra. Inasmuch as the case was tried upon a wrong theory and was not fully developed, the judgment will be reversed and the contest remanded for a new trial.

11961–1961
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Stewart Oil Co. neutral
texapp · 1951
2 sentences

1960Vol. 31A, p. 708: "Where a situation that would circumvent the rule is created by the voluntary act or connivance of the parties after the rule has attached to the property, such situation cannot be asserted as a valid ground for exception to the rule." We relied upon this rule and quoted it in Humble Oil and Refining Co. v. Stewart Oil Co., Tex.Civ.App., 241 S.W.2d 364, 366 , where we said: "But for the execution of the mineral deed to Laster there would have been common ownership of the 194-acre tract and the.95-acre tract in Maxwell when the 1930 lease was made.

1960Vol. 31 A, p. 708: “Where a situation that would circumvent the rule is created by the voluntary act or connivance of the parties after the rule has attached to the property, such situation cannot be asserted as a valid ground for exception to the rule.” We relied upon this rule and quoted it' in Humble Oil and Refining Co. v. Stewart Oil Co., Tex.Civ.App., 241 S.W.2d 364, 366 , where we said: “But for the execution of the mineral deed to Laster there would have been common ownérship of the 194-acre tract and the .95-acre tract in Maxwell when the 1930 lease was made.

11960–1960
Railroad Commission v. Humble Oil & Refining Co. green
tex · 1952
2 sentences

1960Railroad Commission of Texas v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., 151 Tex. 51 , 245 S.W.2d 488 .

1960Railroad Commission of Texas v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., 151 Tex. 51 , 245 S.W.2d 488 .

11960–1960

Where else courts name it

TX 5 (1960–1995) GA 3 (1923–1931) AZ 2 (1986–2025) LA 2 (1981–1991)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check