basis for a lesser-included-offense instruction (Utah) · Go Syfert
← Utah issues

basis for a lesser-included-offense instruction in Utah

5 Utah opinions name it 1 courts 2017–2025 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Hullgreen
utahctapp · 2017 · cited in 2 Utah opinions naming this issue, 2020–2025
2 sentences

2025Indeed, “counsel may have perfectly valid tactical reasons to forgo [a lesser-included-offense] instruction and to instead present an all or nothing defense that entails avoiding a lesser- included-offense instruction in the hopes the jury will find the defendant totally innocent of any wrongdoing.” Id. (cleaned up); accord State v. Hull, 2017 UT App 233, ¶ 16 , 414 P.3d 526 .

2020As we have explained, “even when there is a basis for a lesser-included-offense instruction, counsel can reasonably decide not to request one.” Hull, 2017 UT App 233, ¶ 16 .

12
State v. Flynngreen
utahctapp · 2022 · cited in 1 Utah opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
2 sentences

2025See, e.g., Flynn, 2022 UT App 89, ¶ 18 (“Even when there is a basis for a lesser-included-offense instruction, counsel can reasonably decide not to request one.” (cleaned up)).

2025Indeed, “counsel may have perfectly valid tactical reasons to forgo [a lesser-included-offense] instruction and to instead present an all or nothing defense that entails avoiding a lesser- included-offense instruction in the hopes the jury will find the defendant totally innocent of any wrongdoing.” Id. (cleaned up); accord State v. Hull, 2017 UT App 233, ¶ 16 , 414 P.3d 526 .

11
State v. Powellgreen
utahctapp · 2020 · cited in 1 Utah opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
2 sentences

2023See State v. Powell, 2020 UT App 63, ¶ 42 , 463 P.3d 705 (“Even when there is a basis for a lesser-included-offense instruction, counsel can reasonably decide not to request one.” (quotation simplified)).

2023See State v. Powell, 2020 UT App 63, ¶ 42 , 463 P.3d 705 (“Even when there is a basis for a lesser-included-offense instruction, counsel can reasonably decide not to request one.” (quotation simplified)).

11
State v. Binkerdgreen
utahctapp · 2013 · cited in 1 Utah opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
2 sentences

2020“Depending on the facts of a particular case, counsel may have perfectly valid tactical reasons to forgo the instruction and to instead present an ‘all or nothing’ defense that entails avoiding a lesser-included-offense instruction in the hopes the jury will find the defendant ‘totally innocent of any wrongdoing.’” Id. (cleaned up); see also State v. Binkerd, 2013 UT App 216, ¶ 31 , 310 P.3d 755 (explaining that counsel’s decision not to request a lesser included offense instruction is entitled to considerable deference “in recognition of the fact that counsel is in the best position to gauge

2020“Depending on the facts of a particular case, counsel may have perfectly valid tactical reasons to forgo the instruction and to instead present an ‘all or nothing’ defense that entails avoiding a lesser-included-offense instruction in the hopes the jury will find the defendant ‘totally innocent of any wrongdoing.’” Id. (cleaned up); see also State v. Binkerd, 2013 UT App 216, ¶ 31 , 310 P.3d 755 (explaining that counsel’s decision not to request a lesser included offense instruction is entitled to considerable deference “in recognition of the fact that counsel is in the best position to gauge

11
Keeble v. United Statesgreen
scotus · 1973 · cited in 1 Utah opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
2 sentences

2017We assume, for the purposes of this case, that criminal trespass is a lesser included offense of the burglary charged. 1 ¶15 A defendant is entitled to a jury instruction on a lesser included offense, so long as "the evidence would permit a jury rationally to find him guilty of the lesser offense and acquit him of the greater." Keeble v. United States , 412 U.S. 205 , 208, 93 S.Ct. 1993 , 36 L.Ed.2d 844 (1973). 2 Thus, when there is a basis for a lesser-included-offense instruction in the evidence, and the defense requests one be given, the court must give the instruction.

2017We assume, for the purposes of this case, that criminal trespass is a lesser included offense of the burglary charged. 1 ¶15 A defendant is entitled to a jury instruction on a lesser included offense, so long as "the evidence would permit a jury rationally to find him guilty of the lesser offense and acquit him of the greater." Keeble v. United States , 412 U.S. 205 , 208, 93 S.Ct. 1993 , 36 L.Ed.2d 844 (1973). 2 Thus, when there is a basis for a lesser-included-offense instruction in the evidence, and the defense requests one be given, the court must give the instruction.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Goldenwest Federal Credit Union v. Kenworthy green
utahctapp · 2017
2 sentences

2021Furthermore, “even when there is a basis for a lesser-included-offense instruction, counsel can reasonably decide not to request one.” State v. Hull, 2017 UT App 9 .

2021Furthermore, “even when there is a basis for a lesser-included-offense instruction, counsel can reasonably decide not to request one.” State v. Hull, 2017 UT App 9 .

12021–2021
State v. Feldmiller green
utahctapp · 2013
2 sentences

2017This is because, depending on the facts of a particular case, counsel may have perfectly valid tactical reasons to forgo the instruction and to instead present an "all or nothing" defense that entails avoiding a lesser-included-offense instruction in the hopes the jury will find the defendant "totally innocent of any wrongdoing." See State v. Dyer , 671 P.2d 142 , 145 (Utah 1983) ; cf. State v. Feldmiller , 2013 UT App 275 , ¶¶ 3-4, 316 P.3d 991 (per curiam) (holding that counsel did not perform deficiently by forgoing a special mitigation instruction, because the "wide latitude counsel is giv

2017This is because, depending on the facts of a particular case, counsel may have perfectly valid tactical reasons to forgo the instruction and to instead present an "all or nothing" defense that entails avoiding a lesser-included-offense instruction in the hopes the jury will find the defendant "totally innocent of any wrongdoing." See State v. Dyer , 671 P.2d 142 , 145 (Utah 1983) ; cf. State v. Feldmiller , 2013 UT App 275 , ¶¶ 3-4, 316 P.3d 991 (per curiam) (holding that counsel did not perform deficiently by forgoing a special mitigation instruction, because the "wide latitude counsel is giv

12017–2017
State v. Dyer green
utah · 1983
1 sentence

2017This is because, depending on the facts of a particular case, counsel may have perfectly valid tactical reasons to forgo the instruction and to instead present an "all or nothing" defense that entails avoiding a lesser-included-offense instruction in the hopes the jury will find the defendant "totally innocent of any wrongdoing." See State v. Dyer , 671 P.2d 142 , 145 (Utah 1983) ; cf. State v. Feldmiller , 2013 UT App 275 , ¶¶ 3-4, 316 P.3d 991 (per curiam) (holding that counsel did not perform deficiently by forgoing a special mitigation instruction, because the "wide latitude counsel is giv

12017–2017

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check