Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Utah opinions name it 1 courts 2017–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hullgreen2 sentences2025Indeed, “counsel may have perfectly valid tactical reasons to forgo [a lesser-included-offense] instruction and to instead present an all or nothing defense that entails avoiding a lesser- included-offense instruction in the hopes the jury will find the defendant totally innocent of any wrongdoing.” Id. (cleaned up); accord State v. Hull, 2017 UT App 233, ¶ 16 , 414 P.3d 526 . 2020As we have explained, “even when there is a basis for a lesser-included-offense instruction, counsel can reasonably decide not to request one.” Hull, 2017 UT App 233, ¶ 16 . | 1 | 2 |
State v. Flynngreen2 sentences2025See, e.g., Flynn, 2022 UT App 89, ¶ 18 (“Even when there is a basis for a lesser-included-offense instruction, counsel can reasonably decide not to request one.” (cleaned up)). 2025Indeed, “counsel may have perfectly valid tactical reasons to forgo [a lesser-included-offense] instruction and to instead present an all or nothing defense that entails avoiding a lesser- included-offense instruction in the hopes the jury will find the defendant totally innocent of any wrongdoing.” Id. (cleaned up); accord State v. Hull, 2017 UT App 233, ¶ 16 , 414 P.3d 526 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Powellgreen2 sentences2023See State v. Powell, 2020 UT App 63, ¶ 42 , 463 P.3d 705 (“Even when there is a basis for a lesser-included-offense instruction, counsel can reasonably decide not to request one.” (quotation simplified)). 2023See State v. Powell, 2020 UT App 63, ¶ 42 , 463 P.3d 705 (“Even when there is a basis for a lesser-included-offense instruction, counsel can reasonably decide not to request one.” (quotation simplified)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Binkerdgreen2 sentences2020“Depending on the facts of a particular case, counsel may have perfectly valid tactical reasons to forgo the instruction and to instead present an ‘all or nothing’ defense that entails avoiding a lesser-included-offense instruction in the hopes the jury will find the defendant ‘totally innocent of any wrongdoing.’” Id. (cleaned up); see also State v. Binkerd, 2013 UT App 216, ¶ 31 , 310 P.3d 755 (explaining that counsel’s decision not to request a lesser included offense instruction is entitled to considerable deference “in recognition of the fact that counsel is in the best position to gauge 2020“Depending on the facts of a particular case, counsel may have perfectly valid tactical reasons to forgo the instruction and to instead present an ‘all or nothing’ defense that entails avoiding a lesser-included-offense instruction in the hopes the jury will find the defendant ‘totally innocent of any wrongdoing.’” Id. (cleaned up); see also State v. Binkerd, 2013 UT App 216, ¶ 31 , 310 P.3d 755 (explaining that counsel’s decision not to request a lesser included offense instruction is entitled to considerable deference “in recognition of the fact that counsel is in the best position to gauge | 1 | 1 |
Keeble v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2017We assume, for the purposes of this case, that criminal trespass is a lesser included offense of the burglary charged. 1 ¶15 A defendant is entitled to a jury instruction on a lesser included offense, so long as "the evidence would permit a jury rationally to find him guilty of the lesser offense and acquit him of the greater." Keeble v. United States , 412 U.S. 205 , 208, 93 S.Ct. 1993 , 36 L.Ed.2d 844 (1973). 2 Thus, when there is a basis for a lesser-included-offense instruction in the evidence, and the defense requests one be given, the court must give the instruction. 2017We assume, for the purposes of this case, that criminal trespass is a lesser included offense of the burglary charged. 1 ¶15 A defendant is entitled to a jury instruction on a lesser included offense, so long as "the evidence would permit a jury rationally to find him guilty of the lesser offense and acquit him of the greater." Keeble v. United States , 412 U.S. 205 , 208, 93 S.Ct. 1993 , 36 L.Ed.2d 844 (1973). 2 Thus, when there is a basis for a lesser-included-offense instruction in the evidence, and the defense requests one be given, the court must give the instruction. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Goldenwest Federal Credit Union v. Kenworthy
green
2 sentences2021Furthermore, “even when there is a basis for a lesser-included-offense instruction, counsel can reasonably decide not to request one.” State v. Hull, 2017 UT App 9 . 2021Furthermore, “even when there is a basis for a lesser-included-offense instruction, counsel can reasonably decide not to request one.” State v. Hull, 2017 UT App 9 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Feldmiller
green
2 sentences2017This is because, depending on the facts of a particular case, counsel may have perfectly valid tactical reasons to forgo the instruction and to instead present an "all or nothing" defense that entails avoiding a lesser-included-offense instruction in the hopes the jury will find the defendant "totally innocent of any wrongdoing." See State v. Dyer , 671 P.2d 142 , 145 (Utah 1983) ; cf. State v. Feldmiller , 2013 UT App 275 , ¶¶ 3-4, 316 P.3d 991 (per curiam) (holding that counsel did not perform deficiently by forgoing a special mitigation instruction, because the "wide latitude counsel is giv 2017This is because, depending on the facts of a particular case, counsel may have perfectly valid tactical reasons to forgo the instruction and to instead present an "all or nothing" defense that entails avoiding a lesser-included-offense instruction in the hopes the jury will find the defendant "totally innocent of any wrongdoing." See State v. Dyer , 671 P.2d 142 , 145 (Utah 1983) ; cf. State v. Feldmiller , 2013 UT App 275 , ¶¶ 3-4, 316 P.3d 991 (per curiam) (holding that counsel did not perform deficiently by forgoing a special mitigation instruction, because the "wide latitude counsel is giv | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Dyer
green
1 sentence2017This is because, depending on the facts of a particular case, counsel may have perfectly valid tactical reasons to forgo the instruction and to instead present an "all or nothing" defense that entails avoiding a lesser-included-offense instruction in the hopes the jury will find the defendant "totally innocent of any wrongdoing." See State v. Dyer , 671 P.2d 142 , 145 (Utah 1983) ; cf. State v. Feldmiller , 2013 UT App 275 , ¶¶ 3-4, 316 P.3d 991 (per curiam) (holding that counsel did not perform deficiently by forgoing a special mitigation instruction, because the "wide latitude counsel is giv | 1 | 2017–2017 |