Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Utah opinions name it 1 courts 2012–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Samoragreen2 sentences2015Moreover, our supreme court has previously determined "that a sentence imposed in violation of rule 22(a) of the Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure may be considered a sentence imposed in an illegal manner under rule 22(e)." State v. Samora, 2004 UT 79, 13 , 99 P.3d 858 (internal quotation marks omitted). 2015Moreover, our supreme court has previously determined "that a sentence imposed in violation of rule 22(a) of the Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure may be considered a sentence imposed in an illegal manner under rule 22(e)." State v. Samora, 2004 UT 79, 13 , 99 P.3d 858 (internal quotation marks omitted). | 2 | 5 |
State v. Candedogreen2 sentences2012P. 22(e)); see also State v. Candedo, 2010 UT 32, ¶ 14 , 232 P.3d 1008 ("[Thlhe definition of illegal sentence under rule 22(e) is sufficiently broad to include constitutional violations that threaten the validity of the sentence."). 2012P. 22(e)); see also State v. Candedo, 2010 UT 32, ¶ 14 , 232 P.3d 1008 ("[Thlhe definition of illegal sentence under rule 22(e) is sufficiently broad to include constitutional violations that threaten the validity of the sentence."). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.