Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Harmongreen1 sentence2018Because of this, we "look at the circumstances in which a criminal defendant's post-arrest silence ... is revealed in court in order to determine whether the purposes underlying the rule in Doyle have been undermined." Harmon , 956 P.2d at 268 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Boydgreen1 sentence2011CJ State v. Boyd, 2001 UT 830 , 128, 25 P.3d 985 ("As a general rule, newly discovered evidence does not warrant a new trial where its only use is impeachment."). - Proof that Grandson viewed pornography on a previous occasion or engaged in simulated sex does not call into question the accuracy of any of the details of Grandson's description of the abuse. | 1 | 1 |
Charles Lindgren v. Michael P. Lanegreen2 sentences1998Lindgren v. Lane, 925 F.2d 198, 202 (7th Cir.1991) (emphasis added). 1998Lindgren v. Lane, 925 F.2d 198, 202 (7th Cir.1991) (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
Seattle-First National Bank v. Marshallgreen2 sentences1992Seattle-First Nat'l Bank v. Marshall, 31 Wash.App. 339 , 641 P.2d 1194, 1197 (1982). 5 . 1992Seattle-First Nat'l Bank v. Marshall, 31 Wash.App. 339 , 641 P.2d 1194, 1197 (1982). 5 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Maas
green
2 sentences2018Further, even if we find that the rule established in Doyle has been violated, we will not reverse a conviction if the violation is harmless "beyond a reasonable doubt." State v. Maas , 1999 UT App 325 , ¶ 14, 991 P.2d 1108 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). ¶57 Here, Defendant alleges that Officer's statement indicating that Defendant invoked his right to remain silent was used to impeach Defendant, placing it squarely within Doyle 's prohibition. 2018Further, even if we find that the rule established in Doyle has been violated, we will not reverse a conviction if the violation is harmless "beyond a reasonable doubt." State v. Maas , 1999 UT App 325 , ¶ 14, 991 P.2d 1108 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). ¶57 Here, Defendant alleges that Officer's statement indicating that Defendant invoked his right to remain silent was used to impeach Defendant, placing it squarely within Doyle 's prohibition. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Weldon
green
1 sentence1991Id. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.