Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Virginia opinions name it 2 courts 2024–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Quadros & Associates v. City of Hamptongreen2 sentences2024Although they did not file a written plea in bar, the parties agreed to proceed as if the demurrers were pleas in bar and the circuit court treated the demurrers accordingly. 7 When considering a summary judgment motion, the court assesses the facts “in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party,” but it is “not permitted to draw inferences that are forced, strained, or contrary to reason.” Quadros & Assocs., P.C. v. City of Hampton, 268 Va. 50, 51 (2004). 2024Although they did not file a written plea in bar, the parties agreed to proceed as if the demurrers were pleas in bar and the circuit court treated the demurrers accordingly. 7 When considering a summary judgment motion, the court assesses the facts “in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party,” but it is “not permitted to draw inferences that are forced, strained, or contrary to reason.” Quadros & Assocs., P.C. v. City of Hampton, 268 Va. 50, 51 (2004). | 4 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jones v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence2026“This limiting principle exists because ‘words [in judicial] opinions are to be read in the light of the facts of the case under discussion.’” Id. (alteration in original) (citation omitted). 27 26F For these reasons, the circuit court erred in holding that the A.s were “de facto parents” entitled under Troxel to the Fourteenth Amendment’s due-process protections afforded to actual 27 The A.s also claim that the Troxel plurality held that “guardians” have constitutional rights over children to the same degree as biological and adoptive parents. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.