future claim (Virginia) · Go Syfert
← Virginia issues

future claim in Virginia

5 Virginia opinions name it 3 courts 1982–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Kellogg v. Greengreen
va · 2018 · cited in 1 Virginia opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024Rather, it found facts sufficient to sustain the plea in bar, stated that the plea “will be sustained,” and it directed Wang’s counsel to “draft and circulate an [o]rder for entry reflecting the decision.” See Kellogg v. Green, 295 Va. 39, 45 (2018) (“Where further action of the court in the cause is necessary to give completely the relief contemplated by the court, the decree is not final but interlocutory.” (quoting Brooks v. Roanoke Cnty.

11
Town of Leesburg v. Giordanogreen
va · 2008 · cited in 1 Virginia opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
2 sentences

2010See Town of Leesburg v. Giordano, 276 Va. 318, 321 , 667 S.E.2d 552, 552 (2008) (in a suit brought by homeowners against a town over an ordinance that increased water and sewer rates, holding that a ruling denying the town’s plea of the statute of limitations was interlocutory).

2010See Town of Leesburg v. Giordano, 276 Va. 318, 321 , 667 S.E.2d 552, 552 (2008) (in a suit brought by homeowners against a town over an ordinance that increased water and sewer rates, holding that a ruling denying the town’s plea of the statute of limitations was interlocutory).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Jaqua v. Canadian National Railroad green
michctapp · 2007
1 sentence

2017Jaqua , 734 N.W.2d at 234 .

12017–2017
Pathway Bellows, Inc. v. Robert W. Blanchette, Richard C. Bond and John H. McArthur Trustees of the Penn Central Transportation Co. green
ca2 · 1980
1 sentence

1990In Pathway Bellows v. Blanchette, 630 F.2d 900 (2d Cir. 1980) cert. denied, 450 U.S. 915 (1981), the court held that a shipper’s suit was barred where: (1) the carrier’s agent had investigated the claimed damage and filled out a damage report, thus it had actual notice; (2) the shipper had sent a letter within the nine-month period giving notice of a future claim; and (3) the shipper sent a letter comporting with the I.C.C. regulations that reached the carrier one day after the expiration of the nine-month period.

11990–1990
McNeil v. North Carolina green
scotus · 1981
1 sentence

1990In Pathway Bellows v. Blanchette, 630 F.2d 900 (2d Cir. 1980) cert. denied, 450 U.S. 915 (1981), the court held that a shipper’s suit was barred where: (1) the carrier’s agent had investigated the claimed damage and filled out a damage report, thus it had actual notice; (2) the shipper had sent a letter within the nine-month period giving notice of a future claim; and (3) the shipper sent a letter comporting with the I.C.C. regulations that reached the carrier one day after the expiration of the nine-month period.

11990–1990
WTAR Radio-TV Corp. v. City Council of Virginia Beach green
va · 1976
2 sentences

1982In that case, we held that a petition alleging violations of the Act failed to state facts sufficient to show good cause for injunctive relief when it contained no allegations from which a future violation of the Act could be apprehended with reasonable probability. 216 Va. at 895 , 223 S.E.2d at 898 .

1982In that case, we held that a petition alleging violations of the Act failed to state facts sufficient to show good cause for injunctive relief when it contained no allegations from which a future violation of the Act could be apprehended with reasonable probability. 216 Va. at 895 , 223 S.E.2d at 898 .

11982–1982

Where else courts name it

CA 49 (1886–2026) OH 38 (1971–2025) TX 38 (1961–2026) IL 30 (1976–2023) PA 26 (1951–2024) FL 24 (1974–2023) NY 20 (1940–2025) CO 16 (1997–2024) UT 14 (1993–2026) MI 14 (1969–2025) NJ 11 (1988–2026) MO 9 (1990–2020) MA 9 (1927–2013) AK 7 (1993–2023) GA 7 (1914–2020) WA 7 (1995–2026) KS 7 (1994–2025) IA 6 (1906–2022) CT 6 (1991–2025) NE 6 (1899–2022) SD 5 (1958–2021) VA 5 (1982–2024) LA 5 (1989–2025) NM 5 (1928–2024) DC 5 (1980–2012) WY 5 (1955–2005) ND 5 (2001–2021) IN 4 (2016–2024) TN 4 (2005–2021) KY 4 (1937–2016) OK 4 (1973–2022) OR 4 (1917–2024) NV 3 (1992–2022) WI 3 (1994–2021) AZ 3 (1966–2004) NH 3 (1991–2003) ID 3 (2010–2020) NC 3 (1950–2011) SC 2 (1999–2025) DE 2 (1967–2026) AL 2 (1995–2015) VT 2 (2018–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check