Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 2025–2025 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Leisge v. Leisgegreen2 sentences2025See Code § 8.01-678. - 26 - disobeyed a court’s order.’” Lee v. Spoden, 290 Va. 235, 247 (2015) (quoting Bagwell v. Int’l Union, 244 Va. 463, 475 (1992), rev’d on other grounds, 512 U.S. 821 (1994)); Leisge, 224 Va. at 306-09 (upholding $25,000 attorney-fee award to the mother as a civil-contempt sanction for enforcing the custody order against the father). 2025See Code § 8.01-678. - 26 - disobeyed a court’s order.’” Lee v. Spoden, 290 Va. 235, 247 (2015) (quoting Bagwell v. Int’l Union, 244 Va. 463, 475 (1992), rev’d on other grounds, 512 U.S. 821 (1994)); Leisge, 224 Va. at 306-09 (upholding $25,000 attorney-fee award to the mother as a civil-contempt sanction for enforcing the custody order against the father). | 5 | 5 |
International Union, United Mine Workers v. Bagwellgreen2 sentences2025See Code § 8.01-678. - 26 - disobeyed a court’s order.’” Lee v. Spoden, 290 Va. 235, 247 (2015) (quoting Bagwell v. Int’l Union, 244 Va. 463, 475 (1992), rev’d on other grounds, 512 U.S. 821 (1994)); Leisge, 224 Va. at 306-09 (upholding $25,000 attorney-fee award to the mother as a civil-contempt sanction for enforcing the custody order against the father). 2025See Code § 8.01-678. - 26 - disobeyed a court’s order.’” Lee v. Spoden, 290 Va. 235, 247 (2015) (quoting Bagwell v. Int’l Union, 244 Va. 463, 475 (1992), rev’d on other grounds, 512 U.S. 821 (1994)); Leisge, 224 Va. at 306-09 (upholding $25,000 attorney-fee award to the mother as a civil-contempt sanction for enforcing the custody order against the father). | 5 | 5 |
Bagwell v. International Union, UMWAred2 sentences2025See Code § 8.01-678. - 26 - disobeyed a court’s order.’” Lee v. Spoden, 290 Va. 235, 247 (2015) (quoting Bagwell v. Int’l Union, 244 Va. 463, 475 (1992), rev’d on other grounds, 512 U.S. 821 (1994)); Leisge, 224 Va. at 306-09 (upholding $25,000 attorney-fee award to the mother as a civil-contempt sanction for enforcing the custody order against the father). 2025See Code § 8.01-678. - 26 - disobeyed a court’s order.’” Lee v. Spoden, 290 Va. 235, 247 (2015) (quoting Bagwell v. Int’l Union, 244 Va. 463, 475 (1992), rev’d on other grounds, 512 U.S. 821 (1994)); Leisge, 224 Va. at 306-09 (upholding $25,000 attorney-fee award to the mother as a civil-contempt sanction for enforcing the custody order against the father). | 5 | 5 |
Lee v. Spodengreen2 sentences2025See Code § 8.01-678. - 26 - disobeyed a court’s order.’” Lee v. Spoden, 290 Va. 235, 247 (2015) (quoting Bagwell v. Int’l Union, 244 Va. 463, 475 (1992), rev’d on other grounds, 512 U.S. 821 (1994)); Leisge, 224 Va. at 306-09 (upholding $25,000 attorney-fee award to the mother as a civil-contempt sanction for enforcing the custody order against the father). 2025See Code § 8.01-678. - 26 - disobeyed a court’s order.’” Lee v. Spoden, 290 Va. 235, 247 (2015) (quoting Bagwell v. Int’l Union, 244 Va. 463, 475 (1992), rev’d on other grounds, 512 U.S. 821 (1994)); Leisge, 224 Va. at 306-09 (upholding $25,000 attorney-fee award to the mother as a civil-contempt sanction for enforcing the custody order against the father). | 5 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.