Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Virginia opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Odum v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2010Accordingly, on remand the sole issue before the circuit court was whether, in accord with the fourth component of the Odum test, evidence of Orndorff's alleged mental disorder was "material, and such as should produce opposite results on the merits at another trial." 225 Va. at 130 , 301 S.E.2d at 149 . 2010Accordingly, on remand the sole issue before the circuit court was whether, in accord with the fourth component of the Odum test, evidence of Orndorff's alleged mental disorder was "material, and such as should produce opposite results on the merits at another trial." 225 Va. at 130 , 301 S.E.2d at 149 . | 1 | 4 |
Orndorff v. Com.green2 sentences2009Orndorff v. Commonwealth, 271 Va. 486, 504-05 , 628 S.E.2d 344, 354-55 (2006) (citing Odum v. Commonwealth, 225 Va. 123, 130 , 301 S.E.2d 145, 149 (1983)). 2 Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s remand order, we remanded to the trial court for application of the “materiality” prong consistent with the Odum test. 2009Orndorff v. Commonwealth, 271 Va. 486, 504-05 , 628 S.E.2d 344, 354-55 (2006) (citing Odum v. Commonwealth, 225 Va. 123, 130 , 301 S.E.2d 145, 149 (1983)). 2 Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s remand order, we remanded to the trial court for application of the “materiality” prong consistent with the Odum test. | 1 | 2 |
Mundy v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2025As to the fourth prong of the Odum test, “newly discovered evidence which merely discredits, contradicts, or generally impeaches a witness is not a basis for granting a new trial.” Mundy v. Commonwealth, 11 Va. App. 461, 481 (1990). 2025As to the fourth prong of the Odum test, “newly discovered evidence which merely discredits, contradicts, or generally impeaches a witness is not a basis for granting a new trial.” Mundy v. Commonwealth, 11 Va. App. 461, 481 (1990). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Tweedgreen2 sentences2009Because the two questions are inextricably intertwined, we address them as one. -3- caution, and are awarded with great reluctance.’” Commonwealth v. Tweed, 264 Va. 524, 528 , 570 S.E.2d 797, 800 (2002) (quoting Stockton v. Commonwealth, 227 Va. 124, 149 , 314 S.E.2d 371, 387 (1984)). 2009Because the two questions are inextricably intertwined, we address them as one. -3- caution, and are awarded with great reluctance.’” Commonwealth v. Tweed, 264 Va. 524, 528 , 570 S.E.2d 797, 800 (2002) (quoting Stockton v. Commonwealth, 227 Va. 124, 149 , 314 S.E.2d 371, 387 (1984)). | 1 | 1 |
Stockton v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2009Because the two questions are inextricably intertwined, we address them as one. -3- caution, and are awarded with great reluctance.’” Commonwealth v. Tweed, 264 Va. 524, 528 , 570 S.E.2d 797, 800 (2002) (quoting Stockton v. Commonwealth, 227 Va. 124, 149 , 314 S.E.2d 371, 387 (1984)). 2009Because the two questions are inextricably intertwined, we address them as one. -3- caution, and are awarded with great reluctance.’” Commonwealth v. Tweed, 264 Va. 524, 528 , 570 S.E.2d 797, 800 (2002) (quoting Stockton v. Commonwealth, 227 Va. 124, 149 , 314 S.E.2d 371, 387 (1984)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.