Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Vermont opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Vermont courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re Waitsfield-Fayston Telephone Co., Inc.green2 sentences2025Co., Inc., 2007 VT 55 , ¶ 12, 182 Vt. 79 (“Failure to plead a claim means that the claim is not in the case, and the court may not grant relief on it unless the claim subsequently comes before the court.”). 2025In re Waitsfield-Fayston Telephone Co., Inc., 2007 VT 55 , ¶ 12, 182 Vt. 79 (“Failure to plead a claim means that the claim is not in the case.”). | 2 | 2 |
Molleur v. Lerichegreen2 sentences2007See Molleur, 142 Vt. at 622 , 458 A.2d at 1140 . ¶ 13. 2007See Molleur, 142 Vt. at 622 , 458 A.2d at 1140 . ¶ 13. | 2 | 2 |
In re Waitsfield-Fayston Telephone Co.green2 sentences2025Co., Inc., 2007 VT 55 , ¶ 12, 182 Vt. 79 (“Failure to plead a claim means that the claim is not in the case, and the court may not grant relief on it unless the claim subsequently comes before the court.”). 2025As noted by the Vermont Supreme Court, “A pleading is sufficient under the rule if it gives ‘fair notice of the claim and the grounds upon which it rests.’ Failure to plead a claim means that the claim is not in the case, and the court may not grant relief on it unless the claim subsequently comes before the court.” In re Waitsfield-Fayston Telephone Co., Inc., 2007 VT 55, ¶ 12 (quoting Limoge v. People's Trust Co., 168 Vt. 265, 274 , 719 A.2d 888, 893 (1998)). | 1 | 3 |
Houle v. Quennevillegreen1 sentence2025Second, the nature of a retaliation claim is focused on whether the landlord has either changed the terms of a rental agreement or threatened or brought an action against a tenant who has taken action consistent with one of the three protected categories. 9 V.S.A. § 4465(a); see also Houle v. Quenneville, 173 Vt. 80 , 87-88 (2001). | 1 | 1 |
Limoge v. People's Trust Co.green2 sentences2025As noted by the Vermont Supreme Court, “A pleading is sufficient under the rule if it gives ‘fair notice of the claim and the grounds upon which it rests.’ Failure to plead a claim means that the claim is not in the case, and the court may not grant relief on it unless the claim subsequently comes before the court.” In re Waitsfield-Fayston Telephone Co., Inc., 2007 VT 55, ¶ 12 (quoting Limoge v. People's Trust Co., 168 Vt. 265, 274 , 719 A.2d 888, 893 (1998)). 2025As noted by the Vermont Supreme Court, “A pleading is sufficient under the rule if it gives ‘fair notice of the claim and the grounds upon which it rests.’ Failure to plead a claim means that the claim is not in the case, and the court may not grant relief on it unless the claim subsequently comes before the court.” In re Waitsfield-Fayston Telephone Co., Inc., 2007 VT 55, ¶ 12 (quoting Limoge v. People's Trust Co., 168 Vt. 265, 274 , 719 A.2d 888, 893 (1998)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Vermont. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||