Supreme Court reaffirmed rule (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

Supreme Court reaffirmed rule in Washington

5 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1931–2013 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Irbygreen
wash · 2011 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
1 sentence

2013In Irby, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the rule that “the due process right to be present ‘extends to jury voir dire.’ ” Irby, 170 Wn.2d at 883 (emphasis added) (quoting State v. Wilson, 141 Wn.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Wilson green
washctapp · 2007
1 sentence

2013App. 597, 604 , 171 P.3d 501 (2007)).

12013–2013
State v. Wilson green
washctapp · 2007
1 sentence

2013In Irby, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the rule that “the due process right to be present ‘extends to jury voir dire.’ ” Irby, 170 Wn.2d at 883 (emphasis added) (quoting State v. Wilson, 141 Wn.

12013–2013
State v. Dunaway green
wash · 1988
2 sentences

1990The Supreme Court reaffirmed the test articulated in State v. Dunaway, 109 Wn.2d 207 , 743 P.2d 1237 , 749 P.2d 160 (1987) for determining whether current crimes encompass the same criminal conduct: [T]rial courts should focus on the extent to which the criminal intent, as objectively viewed, changed from one crime to the next.

1990The Supreme Court reaffirmed the test articulated in State v. Dunaway, 109 Wn.2d 207 , 743 P.2d 1237 , 749 P.2d 160 (1987) for determining whether current crimes encompass the same criminal conduct: [T]rial courts should focus on the extent to which the criminal intent, as objectively viewed, changed from one crime to the next.

11990–1990
State v. Edwards green
washctapp · 1986
1 sentence

1990As it did in [State v. Edwards, 45 Wn.

11990–1990
Allingham v. City of Seattle green
wash · 1988
1 sentence

1990The Supreme Court reaffirmed the test articulated in State v. Dunaway, 109 Wn.2d 207 , 743 P.2d 1237 , 749 P.2d 160 (1987) for determining whether current crimes encompass the same criminal conduct: [T]rial courts should focus on the extent to which the criminal intent, as objectively viewed, changed from one crime to the next.

11990–1990
Roth v. United States green
scotus · 1957
2 sentences

1974The definition of obscenity set forth in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 , 1 L.

1974The definition of obscenity set forth in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 , 1 L.

11974–1974
Barton v. King County green
wash · 1943
2 sentences

1972Quoting from Barton v. King County, 18 Wn.2d 573, 576 , 139 P.2d 1019 (1943), the Supreme Court reaffirmed the principle: The gist of the decisions in these cases, ... is that the municipality may be chargeable with negligence for failure to maintain warning signs or barriers if the situation along the highway is inherently dangerous or of such character as to mislead a traveler exercising reasonable care.

1972Quoting from Barton v. King County, 18 Wn.2d 573, 576 , 139 P.2d 1019 (1943), the Supreme Court reaffirmed the principle: The gist of the decisions in these cases, ... is that the municipality may be chargeable with negligence for failure to maintain warning signs or barriers if the situation along the highway is inherently dangerous or of such character as to mislead a traveler exercising reasonable care.

11972–1972
Erie Railroad v. Welsh green
scotus · 1917
1 sentence

1931Co. v. Welsh , 242 U.S. 303 , the supreme court reaffirmed the doctrine that, under the Employers' Liability Act "the true test is the nature of the work being done at the time of the injury," the mere expectation that plaintiff might presently be called upon to perform a task in interstate commerce, being insufficient to bring the case within the act, citing Illinois Central R.

11931–1931

Where else courts name it

TX 26 (1956–2015) CA 25 (1933–2021) IL 22 (1978–2020) PA 19 (1952–2017) FL 17 (1961–2012) MI 12 (1976–2021) OH 11 (1952–2025) MO 10 (1912–2015) VA 6 (1997–2014) CO 6 (1973–2020) WA 5 (1931–2013) WI 5 (2003–2015) GA 5 (1913–2015) TN 5 (1988–2005) NJ 5 (1961–2015) LA 5 (1937–2013) KY 4 (1999–2026) CT 4 (1997–2006) NY 4 (1991–2023) AL 3 (1972–2003) MS 2 (2006–2011) OR 2 (1996–2006) AR 2 (1981–2024) DE 2 (1986–2017) MN 2 (2008–2008) SC 2 (1933–1996) VT 2 (2007–2007) NE 2 (1992–1995) MA 2 (1993–1993) NC 2 (2003–2011) ID 2 (2025–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check