Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
37 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2025 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Flanagan v. Stategreen2 sentences2021Id. 2018Id. | 1 | 9 |
Scott v. Stategreen2 sentences2005See Scott & Johnson v. State, 272 Ark. 88, 93 , 612 S.W.2d 110, 113 (1981), quoted in Proctor v. State, 349 Ark. 648, 664 , 79 S.W.3d 370, 380 (2002) (“Obviously admission depends upon the circumstances surrounding the hearing. 2005See Scott & Johnson v. State, 272 Ark. 88, 93 , 612 S.W.2d 110, 113 (1981), quoted in Proctor v. State, 349 Ark. 648, 664 , 79 S.W.3d 370, 380 (2002) (“Obviously admission depends upon the circumstances surrounding the hearing. | 1 | 2 |
Porchia v. Stategreen2 sentences1998Porchia, 306 Ark. at 445 , 815 S.W.2d at 928 . 1998Porchia, 306 Ark. at 445 , 815 S.W.2d at 928 . | 1 | 2 |
Proctor v. Stategreen2 sentences2005See Scott & Johnson v. State, 272 Ark. 88, 93 , 612 S.W.2d 110, 113 (1981), quoted in Proctor v. State, 349 Ark. 648, 664 , 79 S.W.3d 370, 380 (2002) (“Obviously admission depends upon the circumstances surrounding the hearing. 2005See Scott & Johnson v. State, 272 Ark. 88, 93 , 612 S.W.2d 110, 113 (1981), quoted in Proctor v. State, 349 Ark. 648, 664 , 79 S.W.3d 370, 380 (2002) (“Obviously admission depends upon the circumstances surrounding the hearing. | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Stategreen2 sentences1993See Johnson v. State, 307 Ark. 525 , 823 S.W.2d 440 (1992) and Porchia v. State, 306 Ark. 443 , 815 S.W.2d 926 (1991). 1993See Johnson v. State, 307 Ark. 525 , 823 S.W.2d 440 (1992) and Porchia v. State, 306 Ark. 443 , 815 S.W.2d 926 (1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Flowers v. State
green
2 sentences2020Id. 2017In order to make this determination, this court reviews the totality of the circumstances surrounding the waiver including the age, education, and intelligence of the accused; the lack of advice as to his constitutional rights; the length of the detention; the repeated and prolonged nature of the questioning; the use of mental or.physical punishment; and statements made by the interrogating officers and the vulnerability of the defendant.' Id. | 5 | 2006–2020 |
Jordan v. State
green
2 sentences2010Jordan v. State, 356 Ark. 248 , 147 S.W.3d 691 (2004). [4] This court will reverse a circuit judge's ruling on this issue only if it is clearly against the preponderance of the evidence. 2010Jordan v. State, 356 Ark. 248 , 147 S.W.3d 691 (2004). [4] This court will reverse a circuit judge's ruling on this issue only if it is clearly against the preponderance of the evidence. | 4 | 2004–2010 |
Jackson v. State
green
2 sentences2025Jackson v. State, 2013 Ark. 201 , 427 S.W.3d 607 . 2025Jackson v. State, 2013 Ark. 201 , 427 S.W.3d 607 . | 2 | 2022–2025 |
Cameron Halliburton v. State of Arkansas
green
2 sentences2025Id. 2025Id. | 2 | 2025–2025 |
Bryant v. State
green
2 sentences2024Bryant v. State, 2010 Ark. 7 , at 11–12, 377 S.W.3d 152, 159 . 2024Bryant v. State, 2010 Ark. 7 , at 11–12, 377 S.W.3d 152, 159 . | 2 | 2020–2024 |
Diemer v. State
green
2 sentences2005Jordan, 356 Ark. 248 , 147 S.W.3d 691 ; Diemer, 340 Ark. 223 , 9 S.W.3d 490 . 2005Jordan, 356 Ark. 248 , 147 S.W.3d 691 ; Diemer, 340 Ark. 223 , 9 S.W.3d 490 . | 2 | 2004–2005 |
Hart v. State
green
2 sentences1998Sanford, supra ; Hart v. State, 312 Ark. 600 , 852 S.W.2d 312 (1993). 1998Sanford, supra ; Hart v. State, 312 Ark. 600 , 852 S.W.2d 312 (1993). | 2 | 1998–1998 |
Osburn v. State
green
2 sentences2016Osburn v. State, 2009 Ark. 390 , 326 S.W.3d 771 . 2016Osburn v. State, 2009 Ark. 390 , 326 S.W.3d 771 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Friar v. State
green
1 sentence2016In making this determination, we review the totality of the circumstances surrounding the waiver, including the age, education, and intelligence of the 12 Cite as 2016 Ark. 245 accused; the lack of advice as to his constitutional rights; the length of detention; the repeated or prolonged nature of the questioning; the use of physical or mental punishment; and statements made by the interrogating officers and the vulnerability of the defendant. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Leach v. State
green
1 sentence2013Id. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Arkansas v. Osburn
green
1 sentence2011Id. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
MacKool v. State
green
2 sentences2006Id. 2006Id. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Conner v. State
green
2 sentences2001Conner v. State, 334 Ark. 457 , 982 S.W.2d 655 (1998). 2001Conner v. State, 334 Ark. 457 , 982 S.W.2d 655 (1998). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Sanford v. State
green
1 sentence1999Id., 331 Ark. at 346 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Mauppin v. State
green
2 sentences1998Hart v. State, 312 Ark. 600 , 852 S.W.2d 312 (1993); Mauppin v. State, 309 Ark. 235 , 831 S.W.2d 104 (1992). 1998Hart v. State, 312 Ark. 600 , 852 S.W.2d 312 (1993); Mauppin v. State, 309 Ark. 235 , 831 S.W.2d 104 (1992). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State v. Bell
green
2 sentences1998Here, the relevant inquiry is whether Sanford waived his rights “with the full awareness of both the nature of the right being abandoned and the consequences of the decision to abandon it.” State v. Bell, 329 Ark. 422 , 948 S.W.2d 557 (1997); Humphrey, supra. We make this determination by reviewing the totality of the circumstances surrounding the waiver which include the age, experience, education, background, and intelligence of the defendant. 1998Here, the relevant inquiry is whether Sanford waived his rights “with the full awareness of both the nature of the right being abandoned and the consequences of the decision to abandon it.” State v. Bell, 329 Ark. 422 , 948 S.W.2d 557 (1997); Humphrey, supra. We make this determination by reviewing the totality of the circumstances surrounding the waiver which include the age, experience, education, background, and intelligence of the defendant. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Thomerson v. State
green
2 sentences1986In Thomerson v. State, 274 Ark. 17 , 621 S.W.2d 690 (1981) we explained: Although it would be a better practice to acquaint a defendant that counsel would be appointed by the court without cost to him, here, when we examine the totality of the circumstances surrounding the waiver and the confession, the lack of the words "free of charge", or similar words, does not appear to negate the overall effectiveness of the twice given warning or the voluntariness of the confession. 1986In Thomerson v. State, 274 Ark. 17 , 621 S.W.2d 690 (1981) we explained: Although it would be a better practice to acquaint a defendant that counsel would be appointed by the court without cost to him, here, when we examine the totality of the circumstances surrounding the waiver and the confession, the lack of the words "free of charge", or similar words, does not appear to negate the overall effectiveness of the twice given warning or the voluntariness of the confession. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.