Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1996–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mapp v. Stategreen2 sentences2026In making that determination, “the district court must deliberate not only upon the violation, but also the reasons the conditions were originally imposed and the circumstances surrounding the violation.” Id. (quoting Mapp v. State, 929 P.2d 1222, 1226 (Wyo. 1996)). 2018All that is necessary to uphold the district court's decision "is evidence that it made a conscientious judgment, after hearing the facts," and deliberated "not only upon the violation, but also the reasons the conditions were originally imposed and the circumstances surrounding the violation." Mapp v. State , 929 P.2d 1222 , 1225-26 (Wyo. 1996). | 2 | 6 |
Minchew v. Stategreen2 sentences2011Id.; Gailey v. State, 882 P.2d 888, 891-92 (Wyo.1994); Minchew v. State, 685 P.2d 30, 32 (Wyo.1984). 1996Gailey, 882 P.2d at 891-92 ; Minchew v. State, 685 P.2d 30, 32 (Wyo.1984). | 2 | 2 |
Gailey v. Stategreen2 sentences2011Id.; Gailey v. State, 882 P.2d 888, 891-92 (Wyo.1994); Minchew v. State, 685 P.2d 30, 32 (Wyo.1984). 1996Gailey, 882 P.2d at 891-92 ; Minchew v. State, 685 P.2d 30, 32 (Wyo.1984). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bazzle v. State
green
1 sentence2026W.R.Cr.P. 39(a)(5); Bazzle, ¶ 26, 434 P.3d at 1097 . | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Crouse v. State
green
1 sentence2026In making that determination, “the district court must deliberate not only upon the violation, but also the reasons the conditions were originally imposed and the circumstances surrounding the violation.” Id. (quoting Mapp v. State, 929 P.2d 1222, 1226 (Wyo. 1996)). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Sweets v. State
green
1 sentence2026Sweets, ¶ 16, 69 P.3d at 407 (citing Mapp, 929 P.2d at 1226 ). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Forbes v. State
green
1 sentence2018Id. (citation omitted). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Travis J. Kovach v. The State of Wyoming
green
1 sentence2017Kirkpatrick, Federal Evidence § 4:37, at 848 (4th ed. 2013) (discussing use of “reverse” 404(b) evidence). 1 Additionally, requiring pretrial discovery or disclosure from a defendant may have constitutional implications: “What is apparent from the cases cited and from the continuing debate over pretrial discovery and disclosures against a criminal defendant is that whether such a pretrial requirement raises a constitutional issue depends upon the circumstances surrounding the requirement and the information that will be disclosed.” Kovach, ¶ 74, 299 P.3d at 120 . [¶15] Kovach also involved a c | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.