Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Rhode Island opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Campbellgreen2 sentences2003“It is well-settled that ‘the validity of a juvenile’s waiver of his or her rights should be evaluated in light of the totality of the circumstances surrounding that waiver.’ ” Id. at 1184 (quoting State v. Campbell, 691 A.2d 564, 567 (R.I.1997)). 1999It is well-settled that “the validity of a juvenile’s waiver of his or her rights should be evaluated in light of the totality of the circumstances surrounding that waiver.” Campbell, 691 A.2d at 567 (quoting In re Kean, 520 A.2d 1271, 1276 (R.I.1987)). | 3 | 4 |
In Re Keangreen2 sentences1999It is well-settled that “the validity of a juvenile’s waiver of his or her rights should be evaluated in light of the totality of the circumstances surrounding that waiver.” Campbell, 691 A.2d at 567 (quoting In re Kean, 520 A.2d 1271, 1276 (R.I.1987)). 1997It is well settled that “the validity of a juvenile’s waiver of his or her rights should be evaluated in light of the totality of the circumstances surrounding that waiver.” State v. Campbell, 691 A.2d 564, 567 (R.I.1997) (quoting In re Kean, 520 A.2d 1271, 1276 (R.I.1987)). | 2 | 2 |
Fare v. Michael C.green2 sentences1999Such an evaluation conforms to the directive of the Supreme Court of the United States in Fare v. Michael C., 442 U.S. 707, 725 , 99 S.Ct. 2560, 2572 , 61 L.Ed.2d 197, 212 (1979). 1999Such an evaluation conforms to the directive of the Supreme Court of the United States in Fare v. Michael C., 442 U.S. 707, 725 , 99 S.Ct. 2560, 2572 , 61 L.Ed.2d 197, 212 (1979). | 2 | 2 |
In Re Joseph B.green1 sentence2011For that reason “[i]t is well-settled that ‘the validity of a juvenile’s waiver of his or her rights should be evaluated in light of the totality of the circumstances surrounding that waiver.’” In re Joseph B., 822 A.2d 172, 174 (R.I.2003) (quoting State v. Kryla, 742 A.2d 1178, 1184 (R.I.1999)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Krylagreen2 sentences2011For that reason “[i]t is well-settled that ‘the validity of a juvenile’s waiver of his or her rights should be evaluated in light of the totality of the circumstances surrounding that waiver.’” In re Joseph B., 822 A.2d 172, 174 (R.I.2003) (quoting State v. Kryla, 742 A.2d 1178, 1184 (R.I.1999)). 2011There, this Court observed: “the totality-of-the-circumstances test requires consideration of all of the circumstances surrounding the interrogation of a juvenile suspect, including the juvenile’s age, experience, education, and intelligence, his or her capacity to understand the Miranda warnings and the consequences of waiver, and the presence of a parent, a guardian, or an interested adult.” Id. (quoting State v. Campbell 691 A.2d 564, 567 (R.I.1997)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Pachecogreen1 sentence2007See State v. Pacheco, 481 A.2d 1009, 1016 (R.I.1984) (defendant’s statement to police in which he attempted to exculpate himself from the crime was a factor to consider in evaluating the totality of the circumstances surrounding the waiver of rights). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Frances J.green1 sentence1987Id. at 1176. *1276 Presented as we now are with a fact pattern in which the juvenile’s parents were not present at the time of waiver, we adopt the rationale expressed by the majority of jurisdictions and hold that the validity of a juvenile’s waiver of his or her rights should be evaluated in light of the totality of the circumstances surrounding that waiver, and that the presence or absence of a parent or interested adult is but one factor to be considered in reaching that determination. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hennessy v. City of Melrose
green
1 sentence2019Hennessy v. City of Melrose , 194 F.3d 237 , 250 (1st Cir. 1999). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Nardolillo
green
1 sentence2003“It is well-settled that ‘the validity of a juvenile’s waiver of his or her rights should be evaluated in light of the totality of the circumstances surrounding that waiver.’ ” Id. at 1184 (quoting State v. Campbell, 691 A.2d 564, 567 (R.I.1997)). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Leuthavone
green
1 sentence2001State v. Leuthavone, 640 A.2d 515 , 519 (R.I. 1994). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.