Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
39 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1996–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Proffer v. Yatesgreen2 sentences2010Code Ann. § 155.204 (h) (providing that an order transferring or refusing to transfer is not subject to interlocutory appeal); Proffer v. Yates , 734 S.W.2d 671, 672 (Tex. 1987) (orig. proceeding) (noting that mandamus has been available to compel mandatory transfer in suits affecting parent-child relationships for "a number of years"); In re Kerst , 237 S.W.3d 441, 443 (Tex. App.-Texarkana 2007, orig. proceeding) (considering the erroneous denial of a mandatory transfer of venue under section 155.201(b) of the family code). 2009Code Ann. § 155.204 (h) (providing that an order transferring or refusing to transfer is not subject to interlocutory appeal); Proffer v. Yates , 734 S.W.2d 671, 672 (Tex. 1987) (orig. proceeding) (noting that mandamus has been available to compel mandatory transfer in suits affecting the parent-child relationship for "a number of years"); In re Kerst , 237 S.W.3d 441, 443 (Tex. App.-Texarkana 2007, orig. proceeding) (considering the erroneous denial of a mandatory venue transfer under section 155.201(b) of the family code). | 24 | 26 |
Bollard v. Berchelmanngreen2 sentences2014See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 155.201 (West 2014); Proffer, 734 S.W.2d at 673 (referring to the original enactment in section 11.06 of the Texas Family Code); Bollard v. Berchelmann, 921 S.W.2d 861, 863 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1996, orig. proceeding). 2003Transferring a case to a county where the child has resided for more than six months is a mandatory ministerial duty under section 155.201 of the Texas Family Code. 2 Bollard v. Berchelmann, 921 S.W.2d 861, 863 (Tex.App.San Antonio 1996, no writ) (citing Proffer v. Yates, 734 S.W.2d 671, 673 (Tex.1987), which refers to section 11.06 3 ); see Tex. Fam.Code ANN. § 155.201(b) (Vernon 2002). | 12 | 12 |
In Re Ledergreen2 sentences2008Proffer v. Yates , 734 S.W.2d 671, 672 (Tex. 1987) (orig. proceeding); In re Leder , No. 01-07-00453-CV, 2007 WL 1953877, at *2 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] July 6, 2007, orig. proceeding). 2007Proffer v. Yates, 734 S.W.2d 671, 672 (Tex.1987) (orig.proceeding); In re Leder, No. 01-07-00453-CV, — S.W.3d -, -, 2007 WL 1953877, at *2 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] July 6, 2007, orig. proceeding). | 6 | 6 |
In Re Kerstgreen2 sentences2017We have held that “[transfer of a SAPCR action to a county where the child has resided for more than six months is a mandatory, ministerial duty under Section 155.201(b) of the Texas Family Code.” In re Kerst, 237 S.W.3d 441, 443 (Tex. App.-Texarkana 2007, orig. proceeding). 2010Code Ann. § 155.204 (h) (providing that an order transferring or refusing to transfer is not subject to interlocutory appeal); Proffer v. Yates , 734 S.W.2d 671, 672 (Tex. 1987) (orig. proceeding) (noting that mandamus has been available to compel mandatory transfer in suits affecting parent-child relationships for "a number of years"); In re Kerst , 237 S.W.3d 441, 443 (Tex. App.-Texarkana 2007, orig. proceeding) (considering the erroneous denial of a mandatory transfer of venue under section 155.201(b) of the family code). | 5 | 5 |
In Re Kramergreen2 sentences2011See Kramer, 9 S.W.3d at 450 (citing Proffer, 734 S.W.2d at 673 ). 2011See In re Kramer, 9 S.W.3d 449, 450 (Tex. *136 App.-San Antonio 1999, orig. proceeding) (citing Proffer v. Yates, 734 S.W.2d 671, 673 (Tex.1987) (orig. proceeding)). | 3 | 3 |
In Re Texas Ass'n of School Boards, Inc.green2 sentences2008Bds., Inc ., 169 S.W.3d 653, 656 (Tex. 2005); see Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 155.204(h) (Vernon Supp. 2006) (providing that denial of mandatory transfer is not subject to interlocutory appeal). (2) Transfer of a SAPCR action to a county where the child has resided for more than six months is a mandatory ministerial duty under Section 155.201(b) of the Texas Family Code. 2007Bds., Inc., 169 S.W.3d 653, 656 (Tex.2005); see Tex Fam.Code Ann. § 155.204(h) (Vernon Supp.2006) (providing that denial of mandatory transfer is not subject to interlocutory appeal). 2 Transfer of a SAPCR action to a county where the child has resided for more than six months is a mandatory ministerial duty under Section 155.201(b) of the Texas Family Code. | 3 | 3 |
In Re Powellgreen2 sentences2024See In re R.H., 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 10463 at *3-4; In re Wheeler, 177 S.W.3d 350, 352 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2005, orig. proceeding); In re Powell, 79 S.W.3d 814, 816 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2002, orig. proceeding); see TEX. 2020In re Wheeler, 177 S.W.3d 350, 352 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2005, orig. proceeding); In re Powell, 79 S.W.3d 814, 816 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2002, orig. proceeding); see Tex. Fam. | 2 | 2 |
In Re Wheelergreen2 sentences2024See In re R.H., 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 10463 at *3-4; In re Wheeler, 177 S.W.3d 350, 352 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2005, orig. proceeding); In re Powell, 79 S.W.3d 814, 816 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2002, orig. proceeding); see TEX. 2020In re Wheeler, 177 S.W.3d 350, 352 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2005, orig. proceeding); In re Powell, 79 S.W.3d 814, 816 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2002, orig. proceeding); see Tex. Fam. | 2 | 2 |
Leonard v. Paxsongreen2 sentences2003In support of her argument that the MSA provision does not control over the mandatory transfer requirement of section 155.201, Calderon calls our attention to the supreme court’s decision in Leonard v. Paxson, 654 S.W.2d 440 (Tex.1983). 2002In support of her argument that the M.S.A. provision does not control over the mandatory transfer requirement of section 155.201, Calderon calls our attention to the supreme court’s decision in Leonard v. Paxson, 654 S.W.2d 440 (Tex.1983). | 1 | 4 |
In Re Leyvagreen1 sentence2015“In -3- 04-15-00606-CV a suit to modify the parent-child relationship, the trial court has a mandatory ministerial duty under Family Code section 155.201 to transfer the suit to a county where the child has lived for six months or longer.” In re Leyva, 333 S.W.3d 315, 317 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2010, orig. proceeding). | 1 | 1 |
Trader v. Deargreen1 sentence2010The purpose of having a court of continuing jurisdiction is to ―avoi[d] forum shopping, races to the courthouse, child snatching, and the harassment of a parent by the other parent‘s filing suits in random courts.‖ Trader v. Dear, 565 S.W.2d 233, 235 (Tex. 1978) (orig. proceeding). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Calderon
green
2 sentences2019“Transferring a case to a county where the child has resided for more than six months is a mandatory ministerial duty under section 155.201 of the Texas Family Code.” Calderon, 96 S.W.3d at 715 . 2017"Transferring a case to a county where the child has resided for more than six months is a mandatory ministerial duty under section 155.201 of the Texas Family Code." Calderon , 96 S.W.3d at 715 . | 4 | 2006–2019 |
In Re Nabors
green
2 sentences2010We believe her violation of the decree was unintentional. 8 Absent any intent by Cooper to violate the decree, we see no reason the mandatory transfer provisions of Section 155.201 should not apply. ―In determining the county of principal residence we focus on elements of permanency for the children which are critical to establishing residency for venue purposes.‖ Nabors, 276 S.W.3d at 197 . 2010“In determining the county of principal residence we focus on elements of permanency for the children which are critical to establishing residency for venue purposes.” Nabors, 276 S.W.3d at 197 . | 4 | 2009–2010 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.