Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
20 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1947–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Caldor's, Inc. v. Bedding Barn, Inc.green2 sentences1989See Caldor’s, Ine. v. Bedding Barn, Inc., 177 Conn. 304, 314 , 417 A.2d 303 (1979). 1980II The plaintiffs’ alternate challenge to the constitutionality of § 51-47 as amended is based upon their right to equal protection of the law under article first, § 20, of the Connecticut constitution 4 and § 1 of the fourteenth amendment of the constitution of the United States. 5 As we have recently reiterated, the equal protection provisions of the *563 state and federal constitutions “have the same meaning and the same limitations.” Caldor’s Inc. v. Bedding Barn, Inc., 177 Conn. 304, 314 , 417 A.2d 304 (1979); Horton v. Meskill, 172 Conn. 615, 639 , 376 A.2d 359 (1977); State v. Rao, 171 | 1 | 2 |
United States v. J.B. Browngreen1 sentence2022We therefore disagree with the state’s argument that there is no basis in fact for the defendant’s claim that both venirepersons were excused because of their distrust of the criminal justice system. 21 The fifth amendment to the United States constitution provides in relevant part: ‘‘No person shall . . . be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law . . . .’’ The sixth amendment to the United States constitution provides in relevant part: ‘‘In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury . . . .’’ Sect | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Cameron Arnoldgreen1 sentence2022We therefore disagree with the state’s argument that there is no basis in fact for the defendant’s claim that both venirepersons were excused because of their distrust of the criminal justice system. 21 The fifth amendment to the United States constitution provides in relevant part: ‘‘No person shall . . . be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law . . . .’’ The sixth amendment to the United States constitution provides in relevant part: ‘‘In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury . . . .’’ Sect | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Jesus Alvarez-Ulloagreen1 sentence2022We therefore disagree with the state’s argument that there is no basis in fact for the defendant’s claim that both venirepersons were excused because of their distrust of the criminal justice system. 21 The fifth amendment to the United States constitution provides in relevant part: ‘‘No person shall . . . be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law . . . .’’ The sixth amendment to the United States constitution provides in relevant part: ‘‘In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury . . . .’’ Sect | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Edgar Jamal Gamorygreen1 sentence2022Smith v. United States, 568 U.S. 106 , 133 S. Ct. 714 , 184 L. Ed. 2d 570 (2013); United States v. Gamory, 635 F.3d 480, 496 (11th Cir.) (noting that ‘‘[the prospective juror] harbored doubts about her ability to be impartial based [on] her belief that her brother had been the victim of police brutality’’ and that this characteristic ‘‘is [not] peculiar to any race’’), cert. denied, 565 U.S. 1080 , 132 S. Ct. 826 , 181 L. Ed. 2d 527 (2011); United States v. Carter, 111 F.3d 509 , 511-12 (7th Cir. 1997) (prior negative experience with law enforcement was race neutral reason to exclude prospecti | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Mooregreen1 sentence2022We therefore disagree with the state’s argument that there is no basis in fact for the defendant’s claim that both venirepersons were excused because of their distrust of the criminal justice system. 21 The fifth amendment to the United States constitution provides in relevant part: ‘‘No person shall . . . be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law . . . .’’ The sixth amendment to the United States constitution provides in relevant part: ‘‘In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury . . . .’’ Sect | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Oscar Rudas, Juaquin Munoz Agudelo, Appeal of Jose Elmer Giraldogreen1 sentence2022Smith v. United States, 568 U.S. 106 , 133 S. Ct. 714 , 184 L. Ed. 2d 570 (2013); United States v. Gamory, 635 F.3d 480, 496 (11th Cir.) (noting that ‘‘[the prospective juror] harbored doubts about her ability to be impartial based [on] her belief that her brother had been the victim of police brutality’’ and that this characteristic ‘‘is [not] peculiar to any race’’), cert. denied, 565 U.S. 1080 , 132 S. Ct. 826 , 181 L. Ed. 2d 527 (2011); United States v. Carter, 111 F.3d 509 , 511-12 (7th Cir. 1997) (prior negative experience with law enforcement was race neutral reason to exclude prospecti | 1 | 1 |
B.T. v. Clark County Division of Family & Childrengreen1 sentence2015See Thompson v. Clark County Division of Family & Children, 791 N.E.2d 792 (Ind. App.) (reversing judgment terminating parental rights where trial court had performed truncated hearing in which summaries of testimony were offered in lieu of testimony), transfer denied, 804 N.E.2d 755 (Ind. 2003); State ex rel. | 1 | 1 |
Timm v. Timmgreen2 sentences2011See, e.g., State v. Fitzgerald, 257 Conn. 106, 117 , 777 A.2d 580 (2001); Timm v. Timm, 195 Conn. 202, 205 , 487 A.2d 191 (1985); State v. Kohlfuss, 152 Conn. 625, 630-31 , 211 A.2d 143 (1965). 2011See, e.g., State v. Fitzgerald, 257 Conn. 106, 117 , 777 A.2d 580 (2001); Timm v. Timm, 195 Conn. 202, 205 , 487 A.2d 191 (1985); State v. Kohlfuss, 152 Conn. 625, 630-31 , 211 A.2d 143 (1965). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Fitzgeraldgreen2 sentences2011See, e.g., State v. Fitzgerald, 257 Conn. 106, 117 , 777 A.2d 580 (2001); Timm v. Timm, 195 Conn. 202, 205 , 487 A.2d 191 (1985); State v. Kohlfuss, 152 Conn. 625, 630-31 , 211 A.2d 143 (1965). 2011See, e.g., State v. Fitzgerald, 257 Conn. 106, 117 , 777 A.2d 580 (2001); Timm v. Timm, 195 Conn. 202, 205 , 487 A.2d 191 (1985); State v. Kohlfuss, 152 Conn. 625, 630-31 , 211 A.2d 143 (1965). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Kohlfussgreen2 sentences2011See, e.g., State v. Fitzgerald, 257 Conn. 106, 117 , 777 A.2d 580 (2001); Timm v. Timm, 195 Conn. 202, 205 , 487 A.2d 191 (1985); State v. Kohlfuss, 152 Conn. 625, 630-31 , 211 A.2d 143 (1965). 2011See, e.g., State v. Fitzgerald, 257 Conn. 106, 117 , 777 A.2d 580 (2001); Timm v. Timm, 195 Conn. 202, 205 , 487 A.2d 191 (1985); State v. Kohlfuss, 152 Conn. 625, 630-31 , 211 A.2d 143 (1965). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Rupargreen2 sentences2009See State v. Rupar, 86 Conn. App. 641, 642 , 862 A.2d 352 (2004), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 919 , 871 A.2d 1030 (2005). 4 In accordance with our policy of protecting the privacy interests of victims of sexual abuse, we decline to identify the victim or others through whom her identify may be ascertained. 2009See State v. Rupar, 86 Conn. App. 641, 642 , 862 A.2d 352 (2004), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 919 , 871 A.2d 1030 (2005). 4 In accordance with our policy of protecting the privacy interests of victims of sexual abuse, we decline to identify the victim or others through whom her identify may be ascertained. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Rupargreen2 sentences2009See State v. Rupar, 86 Conn. App. 641, 642 , 862 A.2d 352 (2004), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 919 , 871 A.2d 1030 (2005). 4 In accordance with our policy of protecting the privacy interests of victims of sexual abuse, we decline to identify the victim or others through whom her identify may be ascertained. 2009See State v. Rupar, 86 Conn. App. 641, 642 , 862 A.2d 352 (2004), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 919 , 871 A.2d 1030 (2005). 4 In accordance with our policy of protecting the privacy interests of victims of sexual abuse, we decline to identify the victim or others through whom her identify may be ascertained. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Burkegreen2 sentences1993Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Tucker, 181 Conn. 607, 609 , 436 A.2d 1259 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S. Ct. 363 , 66 L. Ed. 2d 221 (1980); Pelletier v. White, 33 Conn. Sup. 769 , 772, 371 A.2d 1068 (1976).” DeVita v. Esposito, 13 Conn. App. 101, 111 , 535 A.2d 364 (1987), cert. denied, 207 Conn. 807 , 540 A.2d 375 (1988); see also State v. Preyer, 198 Conn. 190, 199 , 502 A.2d 858 (1985); State v. Burke, 182 Conn. 330, 332 , 438 A.2d 93 (1980). 13 Section 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States provides in pertinent part: “No State shall make or 1993Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Tucker, 181 Conn. 607, 609 , 436 A.2d 1259 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S. Ct. 363 , 66 L. Ed. 2d 221 (1980); Pelletier v. White, 33 Conn. Sup. 769 , 772, 371 A.2d 1068 (1976).” DeVita v. Esposito, 13 Conn. App. 101, 111 , 535 A.2d 364 (1987), cert. denied, 207 Conn. 807 , 540 A.2d 375 (1988); see also State v. Preyer, 198 Conn. 190, 199 , 502 A.2d 858 (1985); State v. Burke, 182 Conn. 330, 332 , 438 A.2d 93 (1980). 13 Section 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States provides in pertinent part: “No State shall make or | 1 | 1 |
State v. Preyergreen2 sentences1993Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Tucker, 181 Conn. 607, 609 , 436 A.2d 1259 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S. Ct. 363 , 66 L. Ed. 2d 221 (1980); Pelletier v. White, 33 Conn. Sup. 769 , 772, 371 A.2d 1068 (1976).” DeVita v. Esposito, 13 Conn. App. 101, 111 , 535 A.2d 364 (1987), cert. denied, 207 Conn. 807 , 540 A.2d 375 (1988); see also State v. Preyer, 198 Conn. 190, 199 , 502 A.2d 858 (1985); State v. Burke, 182 Conn. 330, 332 , 438 A.2d 93 (1980). 13 Section 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States provides in pertinent part: “No State shall make or 1993Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Tucker, 181 Conn. 607, 609 , 436 A.2d 1259 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S. Ct. 363 , 66 L. Ed. 2d 221 (1980); Pelletier v. White, 33 Conn. Sup. 769 , 772, 371 A.2d 1068 (1976).” DeVita v. Esposito, 13 Conn. App. 101, 111 , 535 A.2d 364 (1987), cert. denied, 207 Conn. 807 , 540 A.2d 375 (1988); see also State v. Preyer, 198 Conn. 190, 199 , 502 A.2d 858 (1985); State v. Burke, 182 Conn. 330, 332 , 438 A.2d 93 (1980). 13 Section 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States provides in pertinent part: “No State shall make or | 1 | 1 |
Zeilstra v. Barrington Zoning Board of Reviewgreen1 sentence1989See Caldor’s, Ine. v. Bedding Barn, Inc., 177 Conn. 304, 314 , 417 A.2d 303 (1979). | 1 | 1 |
| Hoenig v. Connellygreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Shustergreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Saenz v. Roe
green
2 sentences2001The principal case upon which he relies explains, however, that the privileges and immunities clause involves “a nonresident’s exercise of the right to move into another State and become a resident of that State.” Saenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489, 502 , 119 S. Ct. 1518 , 143 L. 2001The principal case upon which he relies explains, however, that the privileges and immunities clause involves “a nonresident’s exercise of the right to move into another State and become a resident of that State.” Saenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489, 502 , 119 S. Ct. 1518 , 143 L. | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Horton v. Meskill
green
2 sentences1980II The plaintiffs’ alternate challenge to the constitutionality of § 51-47 as amended is based upon their right to equal protection of the law under article first, § 20, of the Connecticut constitution 4 and § 1 of the fourteenth amendment of the constitution of the United States. 5 As we have recently reiterated, the equal protection provisions of the *563 state and federal constitutions “have the same meaning and the same limitations.” Caldor’s Inc. v. Bedding Barn, Inc., 177 Conn. 304, 314 , 417 A.2d 304 (1979); Horton v. Meskill, 172 Conn. 615, 639 , 376 A.2d 359 (1977); State v. Rao, 171 1980II The plaintiffs’ alternate challenge to the constitutionality of § 51-47 as amended is based upon their right to equal protection of the law under article first, § 20, of the Connecticut constitution 4 and § 1 of the fourteenth amendment of the constitution of the United States. 5 As we have recently reiterated, the equal protection provisions of the *563 state and federal constitutions “have the same meaning and the same limitations.” Caldor’s Inc. v. Bedding Barn, Inc., 177 Conn. 304, 314 , 417 A.2d 304 (1979); Horton v. Meskill, 172 Conn. 615, 639 , 376 A.2d 359 (1977); State v. Rao, 171 | 2 | 1977–1980 |
State v. Rao
green
2 sentences1980II The plaintiffs’ alternate challenge to the constitutionality of § 51-47 as amended is based upon their right to equal protection of the law under article first, § 20, of the Connecticut constitution 4 and § 1 of the fourteenth amendment of the constitution of the United States. 5 As we have recently reiterated, the equal protection provisions of the *563 state and federal constitutions “have the same meaning and the same limitations.” Caldor’s Inc. v. Bedding Barn, Inc., 177 Conn. 304, 314 , 417 A.2d 304 (1979); Horton v. Meskill, 172 Conn. 615, 639 , 376 A.2d 359 (1977); State v. Rao, 171 1980II The plaintiffs’ alternate challenge to the constitutionality of § 51-47 as amended is based upon their right to equal protection of the law under article first, § 20, of the Connecticut constitution 4 and § 1 of the fourteenth amendment of the constitution of the United States. 5 As we have recently reiterated, the equal protection provisions of the *563 state and federal constitutions “have the same meaning and the same limitations.” Caldor’s Inc. v. Bedding Barn, Inc., 177 Conn. 304, 314 , 417 A.2d 304 (1979); Horton v. Meskill, 172 Conn. 615, 639 , 376 A.2d 359 (1977); State v. Rao, 171 | 2 | 1977–1980 |
United States v. Robert W. Carter
green
1 sentence2022Smith v. United States, 568 U.S. 106 , 133 S. Ct. 714 , 184 L. Ed. 2d 570 (2013); United States v. Gamory, 635 F.3d 480, 496 (11th Cir.) (noting that ‘‘[the prospective juror] harbored doubts about her ability to be impartial based [on] her belief that her brother had been the victim of police brutality’’ and that this characteristic ‘‘is [not] peculiar to any race’’), cert. denied, 565 U.S. 1080 , 132 S. Ct. 826 , 181 L. Ed. 2d 527 (2011); United States v. Carter, 111 F.3d 509 , 511-12 (7th Cir. 1997) (prior negative experience with law enforcement was race neutral reason to exclude prospecti | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Smith v. United States
green
2 sentences2022Smith v. United States, 568 U.S. 106 , 133 S. Ct. 714 , 184 L. Ed. 2d 570 (2013); United States v. Gamory, 635 F.3d 480, 496 (11th Cir.) (noting that ‘‘[the prospective juror] harbored doubts about her ability to be impartial based [on] her belief that her brother had been the victim of police brutality’’ and that this characteristic ‘‘is [not] peculiar to any race’’), cert. denied, 565 U.S. 1080 , 132 S. Ct. 826 , 181 L. Ed. 2d 527 (2011); United States v. Carter, 111 F.3d 509 , 511-12 (7th Cir. 1997) (prior negative experience with law enforcement was race neutral reason to exclude prospecti 2022Smith v. United States, 568 U.S. 106 , 133 S. Ct. 714 , 184 L. Ed. 2d 570 (2013); United States v. Gamory, 635 F.3d 480, 496 (11th Cir.) (noting that ‘‘[the prospective juror] harbored doubts about her ability to be impartial based [on] her belief that her brother had been the victim of police brutality’’ and that this characteristic ‘‘is [not] peculiar to any race’’), cert. denied, 565 U.S. 1080 , 132 S. Ct. 826 , 181 L. Ed. 2d 527 (2011); United States v. Carter, 111 F.3d 509 , 511-12 (7th Cir. 1997) (prior negative experience with law enforcement was race neutral reason to exclude prospecti | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Lavigne
green
2 sentences2015State v. Lavigne, 307 Conn. 592 , 599, 57 A.3d 332 (2012).’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Yasiel R., supra, 151 Conn. App. 721 n.7. 7 Section 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution provides in relevant part: ‘‘No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without the process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.’’ 8 The cases from other jurisdictions cited by the 2015State v. Lavigne, 307 Conn. 592 , 599, 57 A.3d 332 (2012).’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Yasiel R., supra, 151 Conn. App. 721 n.7. 7 Section 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution provides in relevant part: ‘‘No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without the process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.’’ 8 The cases from other jurisdictions cited by the | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Canales
green
2 sentences2011Accordingly, we will consider the due process argument only pursuant to § 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution, which provides in relevant part: "No State shall ... deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law...." See State v. Canales, 281 Conn. 572 , 592-93 n. 12, 916 A.2d 767 (2007). [36] Pursuant to General Statutes § 51-39(c), "[w]hen any judge ... is disqualified to act in any proceeding before him, he may act if the parties thereto consent in open court." We repeatedly have held that a party's failure to object to a particular ju 2011Accordingly, we will consider the due process argument only pursuant to § 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution, which provides in relevant part: "No State shall ... deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law...." See State v. Canales, 281 Conn. 572 , 592-93 n. 12, 916 A.2d 767 (2007). [36] Pursuant to General Statutes § 51-39(c), "[w]hen any judge ... is disqualified to act in any proceeding before him, he may act if the parties thereto consent in open court." We repeatedly have held that a party's failure to object to a particular ju | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Kentucky v. Stincer
green
2 sentences2004Therefore, in this opinion, we refer to the proceedings between the attorney for the state's witness and the trial court as ex parte. [45] Section 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution provides in relevant part: "No State shall ... deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law...." The United States Supreme Court, in Kentucky v. Stincer, 482 U.S. 730, 745 , 107 S.Ct. 2658 , 96 L.Ed.2d 631 (1987), interpreted the fourteenth amendment to guarantee a defendant "the right to be present at any stage of the criminal proceeding that is critical 2004Therefore, in this opinion, we refer to the proceedings between the attorney for the state's witness and the trial court as ex parte. [45] Section 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution provides in relevant part: "No State shall ... deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law...." The United States Supreme Court, in Kentucky v. Stincer, 482 U.S. 730, 745 , 107 S.Ct. 2658 , 96 L.Ed.2d 631 (1987), interpreted the fourteenth amendment to guarantee a defendant "the right to be present at any stage of the criminal proceeding that is critical | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Snyder v. Massachusetts
green
2 sentences2004Therefore, in this opinion, we refer to the proceedings between the attorney for the state's witness and the trial court as ex parte. [45] Section 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution provides in relevant part: "No State shall ... deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law...." The United States Supreme Court, in Kentucky v. Stincer, 482 U.S. 730, 745 , 107 S.Ct. 2658 , 96 L.Ed.2d 631 (1987), interpreted the fourteenth amendment to guarantee a defendant "the right to be present at any stage of the criminal proceeding that is critical 2004Therefore, in this opinion, we refer to the proceedings between the attorney for the state's witness and the trial court as ex parte. [45] Section 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution provides in relevant part: "No State shall ... deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law...." The United States Supreme Court, in Kentucky v. Stincer, 482 U.S. 730, 745 , 107 S.Ct. 2658 , 96 L.Ed.2d 631 (1987), interpreted the fourteenth amendment to guarantee a defendant "the right to be present at any stage of the criminal proceeding that is critical | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Pelletier v. White
neutral
2 sentences1993Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Tucker, 181 Conn. 607, 609 , 436 A.2d 1259 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S. Ct. 363 , 66 L. Ed. 2d 221 (1980); Pelletier v. White, 33 Conn. Sup. 769 , 772, 371 A.2d 1068 (1976).” DeVita v. Esposito, 13 Conn. App. 101, 111 , 535 A.2d 364 (1987), cert. denied, 207 Conn. 807 , 540 A.2d 375 (1988); see also State v. Preyer, 198 Conn. 190, 199 , 502 A.2d 858 (1985); State v. Burke, 182 Conn. 330, 332 , 438 A.2d 93 (1980). 13 Section 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States provides in pertinent part: “No State shall make or 1993Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Tucker, 181 Conn. 607, 609 , 436 A.2d 1259 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S. Ct. 363 , 66 L. Ed. 2d 221 (1980); Pelletier v. White, 33 Conn. Sup. 769 , 772, 371 A.2d 1068 (1976).” DeVita v. Esposito, 13 Conn. App. 101, 111 , 535 A.2d 364 (1987), cert. denied, 207 Conn. 807 , 540 A.2d 375 (1988); see also State v. Preyer, 198 Conn. 190, 199 , 502 A.2d 858 (1985); State v. Burke, 182 Conn. 330, 332 , 438 A.2d 93 (1980). 13 Section 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States provides in pertinent part: “No State shall make or | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Tucker v. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co.
green
2 sentences1993Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Tucker, 181 Conn. 607, 609 , 436 A.2d 1259 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S. Ct. 363 , 66 L. Ed. 2d 221 (1980); Pelletier v. White, 33 Conn. Sup. 769 , 772, 371 A.2d 1068 (1976).” DeVita v. Esposito, 13 Conn. App. 101, 111 , 535 A.2d 364 (1987), cert. denied, 207 Conn. 807 , 540 A.2d 375 (1988); see also State v. Preyer, 198 Conn. 190, 199 , 502 A.2d 858 (1985); State v. Burke, 182 Conn. 330, 332 , 438 A.2d 93 (1980). 13 Section 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States provides in pertinent part: “No State shall make or 1993Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Tucker, 181 Conn. 607, 609 , 436 A.2d 1259 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S. Ct. 363 , 66 L. Ed. 2d 221 (1980); Pelletier v. White, 33 Conn. Sup. 769 , 772, 371 A.2d 1068 (1976).” DeVita v. Esposito, 13 Conn. App. 101, 111 , 535 A.2d 364 (1987), cert. denied, 207 Conn. 807 , 540 A.2d 375 (1988); see also State v. Preyer, 198 Conn. 190, 199 , 502 A.2d 858 (1985); State v. Burke, 182 Conn. 330, 332 , 438 A.2d 93 (1980). 13 Section 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States provides in pertinent part: “No State shall make or | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Tucker
green
2 sentences1993Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Tucker, 181 Conn. 607, 609 , 436 A.2d 1259 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S. Ct. 363 , 66 L. Ed. 2d 221 (1980); Pelletier v. White, 33 Conn. Sup. 769 , 772, 371 A.2d 1068 (1976).” DeVita v. Esposito, 13 Conn. App. 101, 111 , 535 A.2d 364 (1987), cert. denied, 207 Conn. 807 , 540 A.2d 375 (1988); see also State v. Preyer, 198 Conn. 190, 199 , 502 A.2d 858 (1985); State v. Burke, 182 Conn. 330, 332 , 438 A.2d 93 (1980). 13 Section 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States provides in pertinent part: “No State shall make or 1993Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Tucker, 181 Conn. 607, 609 , 436 A.2d 1259 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S. Ct. 363 , 66 L. Ed. 2d 221 (1980); Pelletier v. White, 33 Conn. Sup. 769 , 772, 371 A.2d 1068 (1976).” DeVita v. Esposito, 13 Conn. App. 101, 111 , 535 A.2d 364 (1987), cert. denied, 207 Conn. 807 , 540 A.2d 375 (1988); see also State v. Preyer, 198 Conn. 190, 199 , 502 A.2d 858 (1985); State v. Burke, 182 Conn. 330, 332 , 438 A.2d 93 (1980). 13 Section 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States provides in pertinent part: “No State shall make or | 1 | 1993–1993 |
DeVita v. Esposito
green
2 sentences1993Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Tucker, 181 Conn. 607, 609 , 436 A.2d 1259 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S. Ct. 363 , 66 L. Ed. 2d 221 (1980); Pelletier v. White, 33 Conn. Sup. 769 , 772, 371 A.2d 1068 (1976).” DeVita v. Esposito, 13 Conn. App. 101, 111 , 535 A.2d 364 (1987), cert. denied, 207 Conn. 807 , 540 A.2d 375 (1988); see also State v. Preyer, 198 Conn. 190, 199 , 502 A.2d 858 (1985); State v. Burke, 182 Conn. 330, 332 , 438 A.2d 93 (1980). 13 Section 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States provides in pertinent part: “No State shall make or 1993Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Tucker, 181 Conn. 607, 609 , 436 A.2d 1259 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S. Ct. 363 , 66 L. Ed. 2d 221 (1980); Pelletier v. White, 33 Conn. Sup. 769 , 772, 371 A.2d 1068 (1976).” DeVita v. Esposito, 13 Conn. App. 101, 111 , 535 A.2d 364 (1987), cert. denied, 207 Conn. 807 , 540 A.2d 375 (1988); see also State v. Preyer, 198 Conn. 190, 199 , 502 A.2d 858 (1985); State v. Burke, 182 Conn. 330, 332 , 438 A.2d 93 (1980). 13 Section 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States provides in pertinent part: “No State shall make or | 1 | 1993–1993 |
DeVita v. Esposito
green
2 sentences1993Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Tucker, 181 Conn. 607, 609 , 436 A.2d 1259 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S. Ct. 363 , 66 L. Ed. 2d 221 (1980); Pelletier v. White, 33 Conn. Sup. 769 , 772, 371 A.2d 1068 (1976).” DeVita v. Esposito, 13 Conn. App. 101, 111 , 535 A.2d 364 (1987), cert. denied, 207 Conn. 807 , 540 A.2d 375 (1988); see also State v. Preyer, 198 Conn. 190, 199 , 502 A.2d 858 (1985); State v. Burke, 182 Conn. 330, 332 , 438 A.2d 93 (1980). 13 Section 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States provides in pertinent part: “No State shall make or 1993Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Tucker, 181 Conn. 607, 609 , 436 A.2d 1259 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 956 , 101 S. Ct. 363 , 66 L. Ed. 2d 221 (1980); Pelletier v. White, 33 Conn. Sup. 769 , 772, 371 A.2d 1068 (1976).” DeVita v. Esposito, 13 Conn. App. 101, 111 , 535 A.2d 364 (1987), cert. denied, 207 Conn. 807 , 540 A.2d 375 (1988); see also State v. Preyer, 198 Conn. 190, 199 , 502 A.2d 858 (1985); State v. Burke, 182 Conn. 330, 332 , 438 A.2d 93 (1980). 13 Section 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States provides in pertinent part: “No State shall make or | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| Lockwood v. Killian green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Hartford & Connecticut Western Railroad v. Wagner neutral | 1 | 1977–1977 |
| Miller v. Heffernan green | 1 | 1977–1977 |
| State v. Picheco green | 1 | 1967–1967 |
| State v. Zwerdling neutral | 1 | 1967–1967 |
| State v. Ryan green | 1 | 1967–1967 |
| State v. Hanna green | 1 | 1965–1965 |
| State v. Hurliman green | 1 | 1958–1958 |
| State ex rel. Higgins v. Civil Service Commission green | 1 | 1958–1958 |
| Connally v. General Construction Co. green | 1 | 1956–1956 |
| Adams v. Greenwich Water Co. green | 1 | 1951–1951 |
| State v. Stoddard green | 1 | 1947–1947 |
| Keating v. Patterson green | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.