Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
19 California opinions name it 1 courts 1967–2024 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Bautistagreen2 sentences2022(People v. Arnett (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 1609, 1613 (Arnett).) Subdivision (a)(4) of section 667 defines “serious felony” to mean 4 any “serious felony listed in subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7.” Section 1192.7, subdivision (c) in turn identifies 42 offenses as serious felonies, including “any felony in which the defendant personally inflicts great bodily injury on any person, other than an accomplice.” (§ 1192.7, subd. (c)(8).) For an offense specifically enumerated as a serious felony in section 1192.7, subdivision (c), “the question whether that conviction qualifies as a serious felony is 2022(People v. Arnett (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 1609, 1613 (Arnett).) Subdivision (a)(4) of section 667 defines “serious felony” to mean 4 any “serious felony listed in subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7.” Section 1192.7, subdivision (c) in turn identifies 42 offenses as serious felonies, including “any felony in which the defendant personally inflicts great bodily injury on any person, other than an accomplice.” (§ 1192.7, subd. (c)(8).) For an offense specifically enumerated as a serious felony in section 1192.7, subdivision (c), “the question whether that conviction qualifies as a serious felony is | 2 | 4 |
People v. Hawkinsgreen2 sentences2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App 2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App | 2 | 2 |
People v. Buenogreen2 sentences2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App 2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App | 2 | 2 |
People v. Mooregreen2 sentences2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App 2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App | 2 | 2 |
People v. Santanagreen2 sentences2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App 2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App | 2 | 2 |
People v. Hawkinsgreen2 sentences2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App 2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App | 2 | 2 |
People v. Arnettgreen2 sentences2022(People v. Arnett (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 1609, 1613 (Arnett).) Subdivision (a)(4) of section 667 defines “serious felony” to mean 4 any “serious felony listed in subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7.” Section 1192.7, subdivision (c) in turn identifies 42 offenses as serious felonies, including “any felony in which the defendant personally inflicts great bodily injury on any person, other than an accomplice.” (§ 1192.7, subd. (c)(8).) For an offense specifically enumerated as a serious felony in section 1192.7, subdivision (c), “the question whether that conviction qualifies as a serious felony is 2022(People v. Arnett (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 1609, 1613 (Arnett).) Subdivision (a)(4) of section 667 defines “serious felony” to mean 4 any “serious felony listed in subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7.” Section 1192.7, subdivision (c) in turn identifies 42 offenses as serious felonies, including “any felony in which the defendant personally inflicts great bodily injury on any person, other than an accomplice.” (§ 1192.7, subd. (c)(8).) For an offense specifically enumerated as a serious felony in section 1192.7, subdivision (c), “the question whether that conviction qualifies as a serious felony is | 2 | 2 |
People v. Gallardogreen2 sentences2022(People v. Arnett (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 1609, 1613 (Arnett).) Subdivision (a)(4) of section 667 defines “serious felony” to mean 4 any “serious felony listed in subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7.” Section 1192.7, subdivision (c) in turn identifies 42 offenses as serious felonies, including “any felony in which the defendant personally inflicts great bodily injury on any person, other than an accomplice.” (§ 1192.7, subd. (c)(8).) For an offense specifically enumerated as a serious felony in section 1192.7, subdivision (c), “the question whether that conviction qualifies as a serious felony is 2022(People v. Arnett (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 1609, 1613 (Arnett).) Subdivision (a)(4) of section 667 defines “serious felony” to mean 4 any “serious felony listed in subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7.” Section 1192.7, subdivision (c) in turn identifies 42 offenses as serious felonies, including “any felony in which the defendant personally inflicts great bodily injury on any person, other than an accomplice.” (§ 1192.7, subd. (c)(8).) For an offense specifically enumerated as a serious felony in section 1192.7, subdivision (c), “the question whether that conviction qualifies as a serious felony is | 2 | 2 |
People v. Lo Cicerogreen2 sentences2014(See, e.g., People v. Wilson (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 500, 503-504, 515-516 [ 162 Cal.Rptr.3d 43 ] [trial court improperly sentenced defendant under three strikes law; court could not have found prior offense to constitute strike without resolving factual dispute; and court may not impose sentence above statutory maximum based on disputed facts about prior conduct not admitted by defendant or implied by elements of offense]; People v. Bautista (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 646, 654-655 [ 22 Cal.Rptr.3d 845 ] [defendant was entitled, under federal constitutional law, to jury determination whether his cu 2014(See, e.g., People v. Wilson (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 500, 503-504, 515-516 [ 162 Cal.Rptr.3d 43 ] [trial court improperly sentenced defendant under three strikes law; court could not have found prior offense to constitute strike without resolving factual dispute; and court may not impose sentence above statutory maximum based on disputed facts about prior conduct not admitted by defendant or implied by elements of offense]; People v. Bautista (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 646, 654-655 [ 22 Cal.Rptr.3d 845 ] [defendant was entitled, under federal constitutional law, to jury determination whether his cu | 2 | 2 |
People v. Gonzalesgreen2 sentences2014(See People v. Wiley (1994) 25 Cal.App.4th 159, 164 [Jones did not preclude imposition of section 667, subdivision (a) enhancement based on two of three burglary counts and imposition of section 667.5, subdivision (b) enhancement based on third burglary count where all three burglary counts had been charged in a single information and concurrent prison terms were imposed]; People v. Brandon (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 1033, 1055 [“splitting the priors” can support both enhancements]; People v. Gonzales (1993) 20 Cal.App.4th 1607, 1611 [both enhancements may be imposed where prior convictions were br 1996We find the logic of Medina compelling and conclude the court did not err in imposing these enhancements.” (Wiley, supra, at p. 164 ; see also People v. Shea (1995) 39 Cal.App.4th 1257, 1274 [ 46 Cal.Rptr.2d 388 ] [multiple convictions resulting in one term of prison confinement constitute one prior for § 667.5, but fact defendant may be subject to only one § 667.5 enhancement does not mean no other enhancement can be applicable]; People v. Brandon (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 1033, 1054-1055 [ 38 Cal.Rptr.2d 751 ] [Jones “inapposite” where § 667, subd. (a) & § 667.5, subd. (b) enhancements referred | 2 | 2 |
The People v. Wilsongreen2 sentences2014(See, e.g., People v. Wilson (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 500, 503-504, 515-516 [ 162 Cal.Rptr.3d 43 ] [trial court improperly sentenced defendant under three strikes law; court could not have found prior offense to constitute strike without resolving factual dispute; and court may not impose sentence above statutory maximum based on disputed facts about prior conduct not admitted by defendant or implied by elements of offense]; People v. Bautista (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 646, 654-655 [ 22 Cal.Rptr.3d 845 ] [defendant was entitled, under federal constitutional law, to jury determination whether his cu 2014(See, e.g., People v. Wilson (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 500, 503-504, 515-516 [ 162 Cal.Rptr.3d 43 ] [trial court improperly sentenced defendant under three strikes law; court could not have found prior offense to constitute strike without resolving factual dispute; and court may not impose sentence above statutory maximum based on disputed facts about prior conduct not admitted by defendant or implied by elements of offense]; People v. Bautista (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 646, 654-655 [ 22 Cal.Rptr.3d 845 ] [defendant was entitled, under federal constitutional law, to jury determination whether his cu | 2 | 2 |
People v. Brandongreen2 sentences2014(See People v. Wiley (1994) 25 Cal.App.4th 159, 164 [Jones did not preclude imposition of section 667, subdivision (a) enhancement based on two of three burglary counts and imposition of section 667.5, subdivision (b) enhancement based on third burglary count where all three burglary counts had been charged in a single information and concurrent prison terms were imposed]; People v. Brandon (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 1033, 1055 [“splitting the priors” can support both enhancements]; People v. Gonzales (1993) 20 Cal.App.4th 1607, 1611 [both enhancements may be imposed where prior convictions were br 1996We find the logic of Medina compelling and conclude the court did not err in imposing these enhancements.” (Wiley, supra, at p. 164 ; see also People v. Shea (1995) 39 Cal.App.4th 1257, 1274 [ 46 Cal.Rptr.2d 388 ] [multiple convictions resulting in one term of prison confinement constitute one prior for § 667.5, but fact defendant may be subject to only one § 667.5 enhancement does not mean no other enhancement can be applicable]; People v. Brandon (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 1033, 1054-1055 [ 38 Cal.Rptr.2d 751 ] [Jones “inapposite” where § 667, subd. (a) & § 667.5, subd. (b) enhancements referred | 2 | 2 |
People v. Taylorgreen2 sentences2014(See, e.g., People v. Wilson (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 500, 503-504, 515-516 [ 162 Cal.Rptr.3d 43 ] [trial court improperly sentenced defendant under three strikes law; court could not have found prior offense to constitute strike without resolving factual dispute; and court may not impose sentence above statutory maximum based on disputed facts about prior conduct not admitted by defendant or implied by elements of offense]; People v. Bautista (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 646, 654-655 [ 22 Cal.Rptr.3d 845 ] [defendant was entitled, under federal constitutional law, to jury determination whether his cu 2014(See, e.g., People v. Wilson (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 500, 503-504, 515-516 [ 162 Cal.Rptr.3d 43 ] [trial court improperly sentenced defendant under three strikes law; court could not have found prior offense to constitute strike without resolving factual dispute; and court may not impose sentence above statutory maximum based on disputed facts about prior conduct not admitted by defendant or implied by elements of offense]; People v. Bautista (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 646, 654-655 [ 22 Cal.Rptr.3d 845 ] [defendant was entitled, under federal constitutional law, to jury determination whether his cu | 2 | 2 |
People v. Garciagreen2 sentences2021(People v. Garcia (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 961, 971 .) Effective January 1, 2019, Senate Bill 1393 amended sections 667 and 1385 to allow a court to exercise its discretion to strike or dismiss the prior serious felony enhancements.3 (Stats. 2018, ch. 1013, §§ 1–2; People v. Garcia, at p. 971.) On direct appeal, we affirmed the judgment but vacated the sentence and remanded the matter for the trial court to exercise its discretion to strike or dismiss the prior serious felony enhancements in light of Senate Bill 1393. 2020Bill No. 1393 applies retroactively]; People v. Garcia (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 961, 973 [same]; see In re Estrada, supra, 63 Cal.2d at pp. 744-745 [absent contrary legislative intent, “[i]f the amendatory statute lessening punishment becomes effective prior to the date the judgment of conviction becomes final then, in our opinion, it, and not the old statute in effect when the prohibited act was committed, applies”].) Accordingly, on remand the trial court should exercise its discretion as to imposition of the section 667, subdivision (a), prior serious felony conviction enhancements. 31 7. | 1 | 2 |
People v. Coronagreen1 sentence2024(People v. Corona (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 13, 18 [finding trial court’s error in relying upon § 667.6, subd. (d) “was cured by identical and lawful alternate sentencing under section 667.6, subdivision (c)”]; People v. Pena (1992) 7 Cal.App.4th 1294 , 1313–1318 [finding trial court erred in relying on § 667.6, subd. (d), but affirming full consecutive sentences because trial court properly invoked § 667.6, subd. (c), as well].) We reject the defendants’ argument that a remand for resentencing is necessary because “[o]n remand, the court’s reevaluation of whether the evidence supports the imposit | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Crewgreen | 1 | 1 |
| In Re Estradagreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Medinagreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Wileygreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Vaughngreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Irvingreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Sheagreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Perezgreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Tassellyellow | 1 | 1 |
| Anderson v. Superior Courtgreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Younggreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Mustafaagreen | 1 | 1 |
| In Re Diazred | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Ewoldtyellow | 1 | 1 |
| In Re Huffmangreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Evansgreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Smithgreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Masongreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Banksred | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Wade
green
2 sentences2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App 2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App | 2 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Washington
green
2 sentences2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App 2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App | 2 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Kent
green
2 sentences2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App 2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App | 2 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Otterstein
green
2 sentences2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App 2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App | 2 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Sloan
green
2 sentences2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App 2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App | 2 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Corning
green
2 sentences2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App 2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App | 2 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Cross
green
2 sentences2022(People v. Arnett (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 1609, 1613 (Arnett).) Subdivision (a)(4) of section 667 defines “serious felony” to mean 4 any “serious felony listed in subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7.” Section 1192.7, subdivision (c) in turn identifies 42 offenses as serious felonies, including “any felony in which the defendant personally inflicts great bodily injury on any person, other than an accomplice.” (§ 1192.7, subd. (c)(8).) For an offense specifically enumerated as a serious felony in section 1192.7, subdivision (c), “the question whether that conviction qualifies as a serious felony is 2022(People v. Arnett (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 1609, 1613 (Arnett).) Subdivision (a)(4) of section 667 defines “serious felony” to mean 4 any “serious felony listed in subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7.” Section 1192.7, subdivision (c) in turn identifies 42 offenses as serious felonies, including “any felony in which the defendant personally inflicts great bodily injury on any person, other than an accomplice.” (§ 1192.7, subd. (c)(8).) For an offense specifically enumerated as a serious felony in section 1192.7, subdivision (c), “the question whether that conviction qualifies as a serious felony is | 2 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Beltran
green
2 sentences2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App 2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App | 2 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Wyatt
green
2 sentences2022(People v. Arnett (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 1609, 1613 (Arnett).) Subdivision (a)(4) of section 667 defines “serious felony” to mean 4 any “serious felony listed in subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7.” Section 1192.7, subdivision (c) in turn identifies 42 offenses as serious felonies, including “any felony in which the defendant personally inflicts great bodily injury on any person, other than an accomplice.” (§ 1192.7, subd. (c)(8).) For an offense specifically enumerated as a serious felony in section 1192.7, subdivision (c), “the question whether that conviction qualifies as a serious felony is 2022(People v. Arnett (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 1609, 1613 (Arnett).) Subdivision (a)(4) of section 667 defines “serious felony” to mean 4 any “serious felony listed in subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7.” Section 1192.7, subdivision (c) in turn identifies 42 offenses as serious felonies, including “any felony in which the defendant personally inflicts great bodily injury on any person, other than an accomplice.” (§ 1192.7, subd. (c)(8).) For an offense specifically enumerated as a serious felony in section 1192.7, subdivision (c), “the question whether that conviction qualifies as a serious felony is | 2 | 2022–2022 |
Apprendi v. New Jersey
green
2 sentences2022(People v. Arnett (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 1609, 1613 (Arnett).) Subdivision (a)(4) of section 667 defines “serious felony” to mean 4 any “serious felony listed in subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7.” Section 1192.7, subdivision (c) in turn identifies 42 offenses as serious felonies, including “any felony in which the defendant personally inflicts great bodily injury on any person, other than an accomplice.” (§ 1192.7, subd. (c)(8).) For an offense specifically enumerated as a serious felony in section 1192.7, subdivision (c), “the question whether that conviction qualifies as a serious felony is 2022(People v. Arnett (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 1609, 1613 (Arnett).) Subdivision (a)(4) of section 667 defines “serious felony” to mean 4 any “serious felony listed in subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7.” Section 1192.7, subdivision (c) in turn identifies 42 offenses as serious felonies, including “any felony in which the defendant personally inflicts great bodily injury on any person, other than an accomplice.” (§ 1192.7, subd. (c)(8).) For an offense specifically enumerated as a serious felony in section 1192.7, subdivision (c), “the question whether that conviction qualifies as a serious felony is | 2 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Chaffer
green
2 sentences2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App 2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App | 2 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Johnson
green
2 sentences2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App 2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App | 2 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Kelii
green
2 sentences2022(People v. Arnett (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 1609, 1613 (Arnett).) Subdivision (a)(4) of section 667 defines “serious felony” to mean 4 any “serious felony listed in subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7.” Section 1192.7, subdivision (c) in turn identifies 42 offenses as serious felonies, including “any felony in which the defendant personally inflicts great bodily injury on any person, other than an accomplice.” (§ 1192.7, subd. (c)(8).) For an offense specifically enumerated as a serious felony in section 1192.7, subdivision (c), “the question whether that conviction qualifies as a serious felony is 2022(People v. Arnett (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 1609, 1613 (Arnett).) Subdivision (a)(4) of section 667 defines “serious felony” to mean 4 any “serious felony listed in subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7.” Section 1192.7, subdivision (c) in turn identifies 42 offenses as serious felonies, including “any felony in which the defendant personally inflicts great bodily injury on any person, other than an accomplice.” (§ 1192.7, subd. (c)(8).) For an offense specifically enumerated as a serious felony in section 1192.7, subdivision (c), “the question whether that conviction qualifies as a serious felony is | 2 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Blakeley
green
2 sentences2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App 2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App | 2 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Burroughs
red
2 sentences2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App 2022Indeed, “some physical pain or damage, such as lacerations, bruises, or abrasions is sufficient for a finding of ‘great bodily injury.’ ” (People v. Washington (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1042, 1047 .) Similarly, section 243, subdivision (f)(4) defines “serious bodily injury” to mean “ ‘a serious impairment of physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or 5 impairment of function of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.’ ” (People v. Wade (2012) 204 Cal.App | 2 | 2022–2022 |
| People v. Coelho green | 1 | 2024–2024 |
| People v. Pena green | 1 | 2024–2024 |
| Teal v. Superior Court green | 1 | 2022–2022 |
| People v. Shaw green | 1 | 2021–2021 |
| People v. Valencia green | 1 | 2020–2020 |
| People v. Superior Court (Romero) green | 1 | 2020–2020 |
| People v. Spencer green | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| People v. Anderson green | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| People v. Salas green | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| People v. Esquibel green | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| People v. Najera red | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| People v. Gionis green | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| People v. Ramirez green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| People v. Jones green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.