section 20-107.3 monetary award (Virginia) · Go Syfert
← Virginia issues

section 20-107.3 monetary award in Virginia

20 Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 1986–2023 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (14)

CaseFollowedCited
Lightburn v. Lightburngreen
vactapp · 1996 · cited in 6 Virginia opinions naming this issue, 1998–2023
2 sentences

2023“Determining who has legal title . . . has little or no bearing upon how the value of an asset is to be equitably distributed by a monetary award under Code § 20-107.3.” Anderson v. Anderson, 42 Va. App. 643, 650 (2004) (alteration in original) (quoting Lightburn v. Lightburn, 22 Va. App. 612, 616 (1996)).

2004In Lightburn v. Lightburn, 22 Va.App. 612 , 472 S.E.2d 281 (1996), we held: *650 Determining who has legal title ... has little or no bearing upon how the value of an asset is to be equitably distributed by a monetary award under Code § 20-107.3.

56
Brown v. Browngreen
vactapp · 1987 · cited in 2 Virginia opinions naming this issue, 1991–2017
2 sentences

2017Although this Court explained that the circuit court was authorized to fix a date upon which the monetary award at issue was due and payable, it determined that the circuit court lacked authority to order mandatory payment of the monetary award “subject to enforcement by its contempt powers.” Id. at 247, 361 S.E.2d at 369 .

1991Brown v. Brown, 5 Va. App. 238, 246 , 361 S.E.2d 364, 368 (1987).

12
Parra v. Parragreen
vactapp · 1985 · cited in 2 Virginia opinions naming this issue, 1986–1989
2 sentences

1989Parra v. Parra, 1 Va. App. 118, 127 , 336 S.E.2d 157 , *487 162 (1985).

1989Parra v. Parra, 1 Va. App. 118, 127 , 336 S.E.2d 157 , *487 162 (1985).

12
Anderson v. Andersongreen
vactapp · 2004 · cited in 1 Virginia opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
1 sentence

2023“Determining who has legal title . . . has little or no bearing upon how the value of an asset is to be equitably distributed by a monetary award under Code § 20-107.3.” Anderson v. Anderson, 42 Va. App. 643, 650 (2004) (alteration in original) (quoting Lightburn v. Lightburn, 22 Va. App. 612, 616 (1996)).

11
Moreno v. Morenogreen
vactapp · 1997 · cited in 1 Virginia opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
2 sentences

2008See Rule 5A:20(c); e.g., Cruz v. Commonwealth, 12 Va. App. 661 , 664 n.1, 406 S.E.2d 406 , 407 n.1 (1991). -2- pursuant to Code § 20-107.3 and spousal support awards made pursuant to Code § 20-107.1.” Moreno v. Moreno, 24 Va. App. 190, 201 , 480 S.E.2d 792, 798 (1997).

2008See Rule 5A:20(c); e.g., Cruz v. Commonwealth, 12 Va. App. 661 , 664 n.1, 406 S.E.2d 406 , 407 n.1 (1991). -2- pursuant to Code § 20-107.3 and spousal support awards made pursuant to Code § 20-107.1.” Moreno v. Moreno, 24 Va. App. 190, 201 , 480 S.E.2d 792, 798 (1997).

11
Smith v. Smithgreen
vactapp · 1994 · cited in 1 Virginia opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
2 sentences

2001Waste or dissipation of marital assets "occurs 'where one spouse uses marital property for his own benefit and for a purpose unrelated to the marriage at a time when the marriage is undergoing an irreconcilable breakdown.'" Smith v. Smith, 18 Va. App. 427, 430 , 444 S.E.2d 269, 272 (1994) (citation omitted).

2001Waste or dissipation of marital assets "occurs 'where one spouse uses marital property for his own benefit and for a purpose unrelated to the marriage at a time when the marriage is undergoing an irreconcilable breakdown.'" Smith v. Smith, 18 Va. App. 427, 430 , 444 S.E.2d 269, 272 (1994) (citation omitted).

11
Garland v. Garlandgreen
vactapp · 1991 · cited in 1 Virginia opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
2 sentences

1999See Garland v. Garland, 12 Va. App. 192, 195, 403 S.E.2d 4, 6 (1991).

1999See Garland v. Garland, 12 Va. App. 192, 195, 403 S.E.2d 4, 6 (1991).

11
Stroop v. Stroopgreen
vactapp · 1990 · cited in 1 Virginia opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
2 sentences

1995See Stroop v. Stroop, 10 Va. App. 611, 615 , 394 S.E.2d 861, 863 (1990); Booth v. Booth, 7 Va. App. 22, 28 , 371 S.E.2d 569, 572 (1988). 1 Thus, although the trial court was required under § 20-107.3(A) to value the pension at the time of the hearing, it could still consider the issue of waste when making a monetary award under § 20-107.3(E).

1995See Stroop v. Stroop, 10 Va. App. 611, 615 , 394 S.E.2d 861, 863 (1990); Booth v. Booth, 7 Va. App. 22, 28 , 371 S.E.2d 569, 572 (1988). 1 Thus, although the trial court was required under § 20-107.3(A) to value the pension at the time of the hearing, it could still consider the issue of waste when making a monetary award under § 20-107.3(E).

11
Booth v. Boothgreen
vactapp · 1988 · cited in 1 Virginia opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
2 sentences

1995See Stroop v. Stroop, 10 Va. App. 611, 615 , 394 S.E.2d 861, 863 (1990); Booth v. Booth, 7 Va. App. 22, 28 , 371 S.E.2d 569, 572 (1988). 1 Thus, although the trial court was required under § 20-107.3(A) to value the pension at the time of the hearing, it could still consider the issue of waste when making a monetary award under § 20-107.3(E).

1995See Stroop v. Stroop, 10 Va. App. 611, 615 , 394 S.E.2d 861, 863 (1990); Booth v. Booth, 7 Va. App. 22, 28 , 371 S.E.2d 569, 572 (1988). 1 Thus, although the trial court was required under § 20-107.3(A) to value the pension at the time of the hearing, it could still consider the issue of waste when making a monetary award under § 20-107.3(E).

11
Gamer v. Gamergreen
vactapp · 1993 · cited in 1 Virginia opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
2 sentences

1993In pursuit of this result, the trial court may order distribution of a portion of a pension benefit as well as a monetary award pursuant to Code § 20-107.3(D) which “considers] the value ... of the marital share of a party’s retirement or pension plan.” Gamer v. Gamer, 16 Va. App. 335, 343 , 429 S.E.2d 618, 624 (1993).

1993In pursuit of this result, the trial court may order distribution of a portion of a pension benefit as well as a monetary award pursuant to Code § 20-107.3(D) which “considers] the value ... of the marital share of a party’s retirement or pension plan.” Gamer v. Gamer, 16 Va. App. 335, 343 , 429 S.E.2d 618, 624 (1993).

11
Morris v. Morrisgreen
vactapp · 1986 · cited in 1 Virginia opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989
2 sentences

1989The following statement in Morris v. Morris, 3 Va. App. 303, 306 , 349 S.E.2d 661, 663 (1986), is appropriate to this issue: [A] trial court has the power to reserve in a decree of divorce the authority to make a monetary award under Code § 20-107.3.

1989The following statement in Morris v. Morris, 3 Va. App. 303, 306 , 349 S.E.2d 661, 663 (1986), is appropriate to this issue: [A] trial court has the power to reserve in a decree of divorce the authority to make a monetary award under Code § 20-107.3.

11
Potts v. Mathieson Alkali Worksgreen
va · 1935 · cited in 1 Virginia opinions naming this issue, 1988–1988
2 sentences

1988In Ted Lansing Supply Co. v. Royal Aluminum & Construction Corp., 221 Va. 1139, 1141 , 277 S.E.2d 228, 229 (1981) (quoting Potts v. Mathieson Alkali Works, 165 Va. 196, 207 , 181 S.E. 521, 525 (1935)), the Supreme Court, discussing the importance of pleadings, stated: The basis of every right of recovery under our system of jurisprudence is a pleading setting forth facts warranting the granting of the relief sought.

1988In Ted Lansing Supply Co. v. Royal Aluminum & Construction Corp., 221 Va. 1139, 1141 , 277 S.E.2d 228, 229 (1981) (quoting Potts v. Mathieson Alkali Works, 165 Va. 196, 207 , 181 S.E. 521, 525 (1935)), the Supreme Court, discussing the importance of pleadings, stated: The basis of every right of recovery under our system of jurisprudence is a pleading setting forth facts warranting the granting of the relief sought.

11
Ted Lansing Supply Co. v. Royal Aluminum & Construction Corp.green
va · 1981 · cited in 1 Virginia opinions naming this issue, 1988–1988
2 sentences

1988In Ted Lansing Supply Co. v. Royal Aluminum & Construction Corp., 221 Va. 1139, 1141 , 277 S.E.2d 228, 229 (1981) (quoting Potts v. Mathieson Alkali Works, 165 Va. 196, 207 , 181 S.E. 521, 525 (1935)), the Supreme Court, discussing the importance of pleadings, stated: The basis of every right of recovery under our system of jurisprudence is a pleading setting forth facts warranting the granting of the relief sought.

1988In Ted Lansing Supply Co. v. Royal Aluminum & Construction Corp., 221 Va. 1139, 1141 , 277 S.E.2d 228, 229 (1981) (quoting Potts v. Mathieson Alkali Works, 165 Va. 196, 207 , 181 S.E. 521, 525 (1935)), the Supreme Court, discussing the importance of pleadings, stated: The basis of every right of recovery under our system of jurisprudence is a pleading setting forth facts warranting the granting of the relief sought.

11
Venable v. Venablegreen
vactapp · 1986 · cited in 1 Virginia opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
2 sentences

1987Venable v. Venable, 2 Va. App. 178, 186 , 342 S.E.2d 646, 651 (1986).

1987Venable v. Venable, 2 Va. App. 178, 186 , 342 S.E.2d 646, 651 (1986).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Gamble v. Gamble green
vactapp · 1992
2 sentences

2000In Gamble v. Gamble, 14 Va. App. 558 , 421 S.E.2d 635 (1992), we found an abuse of discretion when the trial judge - 10 - linked the distribution of property under Code § 20-107.3 directly to the award of spousal support under Code § 20-107.1.

2000In Gamble v. Gamble, 14 Va. App. 558 , 421 S.E.2d 635 (1992), we found an abuse of discretion when the trial judge - 10 - linked the distribution of property under Code § 20-107.3 directly to the award of spousal support under Code § 20-107.1.

31997–2000
Cruz v. Commonwealth green
vactapp · 1991
2 sentences

2008See Rule 5A:20(c); e.g., Cruz v. Commonwealth, 12 Va. App. 661 , 664 n.1, 406 S.E.2d 406 , 407 n.1 (1991). -2- pursuant to Code § 20-107.3 and spousal support awards made pursuant to Code § 20-107.1.” Moreno v. Moreno, 24 Va. App. 190, 201 , 480 S.E.2d 792, 798 (1997).

2008See Rule 5A:20(c); e.g., Cruz v. Commonwealth, 12 Va. App. 661 , 664 n.1, 406 S.E.2d 406 , 407 n.1 (1991). -2- pursuant to Code § 20-107.3 and spousal support awards made pursuant to Code § 20-107.1.” Moreno v. Moreno, 24 Va. App. 190, 201 , 480 S.E.2d 792, 798 (1997).

12008–2008
Lambert v. Lambert green
vactapp · 1988
2 sentences

1993Lambert, 6 Va. App. at 104 , 367 S.E.2d at 190 .

1993Lambert, 6 Va. App. at 104 , 367 S.E.2d at 190 .

11993–1993

Statutes the citing opinions construe

VA § Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.3 (20) VA § Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.1 (10) VA § Va. Code Ann. § 17.1-413 (4) VA § Va. Code Ann. § 20-91 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check