section 39.111(7) tracks the statutory criteria (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

section 39.111(7) tracks the statutory criteria in Florida

14 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1980–1995 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Thompkin v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 1991 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
1 sentence

1992See Thompkin v. State, 573 So.2d 451 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (18)

CaseCitedYears
Posey v. State green
fladistctapp · 1987
2 sentences

1991In Posey v. State, 501 So.2d 192 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987) the adult sentence of a juvenile was reversed because the order imposing sanctions did not in any manner address the criteria in section 39.111(7)(c)4 of the statute and in Flowers , this court reversed a juvenile's sentence because of the failure of the court to consider the statutory criteria prior to sentencing.

1987West v. State, 503 So.2d 435 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Posey v. State, 501 So.2d 192 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Christy v. State, 489 So.2d 858 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Upshaw v. State, 464 So.2d 1355 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

21987–1991
State v. Rhoden green
fla · 1984
2 sentences

1989In determining suitability for adult sanctions, the trial court must consider the six criteria enumerated in section 39.111(7)(c), and if the court decides to impose *1000 adult sanctions, it must reduce that decision to writing, as required under section 39.111(7)(d). [2] State v. Rhoden, 448 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 1984); Barkley v. State, 522 So.2d 431 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Banks v. State, 520 So.2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Franklin v. State, 472 So.2d 1303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

1988Second, appellant argues that the trial court erred in failing to consider the six specific statutory criteria of section 39.111(6)(c), Florida Statutes, pertaining to the suitability of adult sanctions for juveniles, and in failing to enter a written order containing the court's findings of fact and *433 reasons for imposing an adult sentence as required by section 39.111(6)(d) and State v. Rhoden, 448 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 1984).

21988–1989
Franklin v. State green
fladistctapp · 1985
2 sentences

1989In determining suitability for adult sanctions, the trial court must consider the six criteria enumerated in section 39.111(7)(c), and if the court decides to impose *1000 adult sanctions, it must reduce that decision to writing, as required under section 39.111(7)(d). [2] State v. Rhoden, 448 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 1984); Barkley v. State, 522 So.2d 431 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Banks v. State, 520 So.2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Franklin v. State, 472 So.2d 1303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

1985We therefore are compelled to reverse and remand for compliance with the statute and resentencing, as we did in Franklin v. State, 472 So.2d 1303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

21985–1989
Sirmons v. State green
fla · 1993
1 sentence

1995Sirmons v. State, 620 So.2d 1249 (Fla.1993).

11995–1995
Reed v. State neutral
fladistctapp · 1989
1 sentence

1991Reed v. State, 544 So.2d 1077 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

11991–1991
Martin v. State green
fladistctapp · 1989
1 sentence

1991Hammonds v. State, 543 So.2d 337 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Martin v. State 547 So.2d 998 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

11991–1991
Hammonds v. State green
fladistctapp · 1989
1 sentence

1991Hammonds v. State, 543 So.2d 337 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Martin v. State 547 So.2d 998 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

11991–1991
Keith v. State green
fladistctapp · 1989
1 sentence

1989We have previously held that such an order does not satisfy the requirements set forth in section 39.111(7)(d) that the trial court must "render a specific finding of fact and the reasons for the decision to impose adult sanctions." See Smith v. State, 543 So.2d 419 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Keith v. State, 542 So.2d 440 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

11989–1989
Banks v. State green
fladistctapp · 1987
1 sentence

1989In determining suitability for adult sanctions, the trial court must consider the six criteria enumerated in section 39.111(7)(c), and if the court decides to impose *1000 adult sanctions, it must reduce that decision to writing, as required under section 39.111(7)(d). [2] State v. Rhoden, 448 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 1984); Barkley v. State, 522 So.2d 431 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Banks v. State, 520 So.2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Franklin v. State, 472 So.2d 1303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

11989–1989
Smith v. State green
fladistctapp · 1989
1 sentence

1989We have previously held that such an order does not satisfy the requirements set forth in section 39.111(7)(d) that the trial court must "render a specific finding of fact and the reasons for the decision to impose adult sanctions." See Smith v. State, 543 So.2d 419 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Keith v. State, 542 So.2d 440 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

11989–1989
Barkley v. State green
fladistctapp · 1988
1 sentence

1989In determining suitability for adult sanctions, the trial court must consider the six criteria enumerated in section 39.111(7)(c), and if the court decides to impose *1000 adult sanctions, it must reduce that decision to writing, as required under section 39.111(7)(d). [2] State v. Rhoden, 448 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 1984); Barkley v. State, 522 So.2d 431 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Banks v. State, 520 So.2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Franklin v. State, 472 So.2d 1303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

11989–1989
Banks v. State neutral
fladistctapp · 1986
1 sentence

1987The trial court was specifically directed to "consider each of the criteria enumerated in Section 39.111(6)(c), conduct a disposition hearing consonant with the direction of Section 39.111(6)(a), and reduce to writing the findings of fact and the reasons for imposing adult sanctions." Banks v. State, 488 So.2d 161 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

11987–1987
West v. State green
fladistctapp · 1987
1 sentence

1987West v. State, 503 So.2d 435 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Posey v. State, 501 So.2d 192 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Christy v. State, 489 So.2d 858 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Upshaw v. State, 464 So.2d 1355 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

11987–1987
Christy v. State green
fladistctapp · 1986
1 sentence

1987West v. State, 503 So.2d 435 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Posey v. State, 501 So.2d 192 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Christy v. State, 489 So.2d 858 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Upshaw v. State, 464 So.2d 1355 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

11987–1987
Upshaw v. State green
fladistctapp · 1985
1 sentence

1987West v. State, 503 So.2d 435 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Posey v. State, 501 So.2d 192 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Christy v. State, 489 So.2d 858 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Upshaw v. State, 464 So.2d 1355 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

11987–1987
Franklin v. State green
fladistctapp · 1985
1 sentence

1985Franklin v. State, 473 So.2d 763 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

11985–1985
Postell v. State green
fladistctapp · 1980
1 sentence

1980The Third District has so held in Postell v. State, 383 So.2d 1159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

11980–1980
State v. Cain green
fla · 1980
1 sentence

1980State v. Cain, 381 So.2d 1361 (Fla. 1980).

11980–1980

Statutes the citing opinions construe

FL § 39.111 (14)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check