Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Florida opinions name it 3 courts 1941–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Williamsgreen2 sentences2000See Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d at 98 . "[T]he protection of due process rights requires that the courts refuse to invoke the judicial process to obtain a conviction where the facts of the case show that the methods used by law enforcement officials cannot be countenanced with a sense of justice and fairness." State v. Williams, 623 So.2d 462, 467 (Fla. 1993). 1995See State v. Williams, 623 So.2d 462 (Fla.1993). | 2 | 2 |
Munoz v. Stategreen1 sentence2000See Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d at 98 . "[T]he protection of due process rights requires that the courts refuse to invoke the judicial process to obtain a conviction where the facts of the case show that the methods used by law enforcement officials cannot be countenanced with a sense of justice and fairness." State v. Williams, 623 So.2d 462, 467 (Fla. 1993). | 1 | 1 |
Department of Law Enf. v. Real Propertygreen1 sentence1998See Department of Law Enforcement v. Real Property, 588 So.2d 957, 965-66 (Fla.1991); State Dep't of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Metiver, 684 So.2d 204 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Cochran v. Harris, 654 So.2d 969 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (stating that forfeiture statute is to be strictly construed). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Fort Lauderdale v. Baruch
green
2 sentences2025Baruch, 718 So. 2d at 846 . 2006Baruch, 718 So.2d at 846 . | 2 | 2006–2025 |
STATE DEPT. OF HWY. & SAF. v. Metiver
green
1 sentence1998See Department of Law Enforcement v. Real Property, 588 So.2d 957, 965-66 (Fla.1991); State Dep't of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Metiver, 684 So.2d 204 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Cochran v. Harris, 654 So.2d 969 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (stating that forfeiture statute is to be strictly construed). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Cochran v. Harris
green
1 sentence1998See Department of Law Enforcement v. Real Property, 588 So.2d 957, 965-66 (Fla.1991); State Dep't of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Metiver, 684 So.2d 204 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Cochran v. Harris, 654 So.2d 969 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (stating that forfeiture statute is to be strictly construed). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Deck v. State
green
1 sentence1996Traylor v. State, 596 So.2d 957 (Fla. 1992), and Deck v. State, 653 So.2d 435 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Traylor v. State
green
1 sentence1996Traylor v. State, 596 So.2d 957 (Fla. 1992), and Deck v. State, 653 So.2d 435 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Hardee
green
1 sentence1989In considering the merits of Defendant’s companion, overbreadth claim, this Court has carefully studied the Circuit Court’s order in State of Florida v Hardee, Case No. 85-139 (Fla. 3d Cir. Ct. March 18, 1986) and the District Court’s subsequent opinion in State v Hardee, 504 So.2d 33 (1st DCA 1987). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Harris v. Wainwright
green
1 sentence1980We find that this question has already been decided adversely to petitioner by the Supreme Court of Florida in Harris v. Wainwright, 376 So.2d 855 , 1979. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
The Surf Club v. Tatem Surf Club, Inc.
green
2 sentences1978Surf Club v. Tatem Surf Club, Inc., 151 Fla. 406 , 10 So.2d 554 (1942). 1978Surf Club v. Tatem Surf Club, Inc., 151 Fla. 406 , 10 So.2d 554 (1942). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Neafie v. Board of Commissioners of Everglades Drainage District
neutral
1 sentence1941Buck, 140 Fla. 188 , 191 So. 309 , we held that the time for redemption under Section 9 of Chapter 18296 expired in two years after the passage of the Act. | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Dykes v. State Ex Rel.
neutral
1 sentence1941Buck, 140 Fla. 188 , 191 So. 309 , we held that the time for redemption under Section 9 of Chapter 18296 expired in two years after the passage of the Act. | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.