Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Virginia opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Torian v. Toriangreen2 sentences2009How to divide the marital share of wife’s retirement account, “as with any other asset, rested within the sound discretion of the chancellor, subject to the limitations of Code § 20-107.3(G) and upon consideration of the Code § 20-107.3(E) factors.” Torian v. Torian, 38 Va.App. 167, 181 , 562 S.E.2d 355, 362 (2002). 2009How to divide the marital share of wife’s retirement account, “as with any other asset, rested within the sound discretion of the chancellor, subject to the limitations of Code § 20-107.3(G) and upon consideration of the Code § 20-107.3(E) factors.” Torian v. Torian, 38 Va.App. 167, 181 , 562 S.E.2d 355, 362 (2002). | 4 | 5 |
Matthews v. Matthewsgreen2 sentences2005Matthews v. Matthews, 26 Va. App. 638, 645 , 496 S.E.2d 126, 129 (1998); see also Torian, 38 Va. App. at 181 , 562 S.E.2d at 362 (division of marital share of husband’s pension, as with any other asset, rested within the sound discretion of the chancellor, subject to the limitations of Code § 20-107.3(G) and upon consideration of the Code § 20-107.3(E) factors). 2005Matthews v. Matthews, 26 Va. App. 638, 645 , 496 S.E.2d 126, 129 (1998); see also Torian, 38 Va. App. at 181 , 562 S.E.2d at 362 (division of marital share of husband’s pension, as with any other asset, rested within the sound discretion of the chancellor, subject to the limitations of Code § 20-107.3(G) and upon consideration of the Code § 20-107.3(E) factors). | 2 | 2 |
O'Loughlin v. O'Loughlingreen2 sentences2007How to divide the marital share of wife’s retirement account, “as with any other asset, rested within the sound discretion of the chancellor, subject to the limitations of Code § 20-107.3(G) and upon consideration of the Code § 20-107.3(E) factors.” Torian v. Torian, 38 Va. App. 167, 181 , 562 S.E.2d 355, 362 (2002). “[F]actors and circumstances leading to the dissolution of the marriage may be considered during equitable distribution -- even if those factors have no financial impact on the marriage -- as long as those factors detracted from the overall ‘marital partnership.’” Ranney v. Ranney 2007How to divide the marital share of wife’s retirement account, “as with any other asset, rested within the sound discretion of the chancellor, subject to the limitations of Code § 20-107.3(G) and upon consideration of the Code § 20-107.3(E) factors.” Torian v. Torian, 38 Va. App. 167, 181 , 562 S.E.2d 355, 362 (2002). “[F]actors and circumstances leading to the dissolution of the marriage may be considered during equitable distribution -- even if those factors have no financial impact on the marriage -- as long as those factors detracted from the overall ‘marital partnership.’” Ranney v. Ranney | 1 | 2 |
Johnson v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2008Moreover, how to divide the marital 1 “If a trial court orders deferred distribution of the marital share of the pension, it need not determine the pension’s present value.” Torian, 38 Va. App. at 177 , 562 S.E.2d at 30 -31 (citing Johnson v. Johnson, 25 Va. App. 368, 374 , 488 S.E.2d 659, 662 (1997)). -7- share of wife’s VRS pension, as with any other asset, rested within the sound discretion of the trial court, subject to the limitations of Code § 20-107.3(G) and upon consideration of the Code § 20-107.3(E) factors. 2008Moreover, how to divide the marital 1 “If a trial court orders deferred distribution of the marital share of the pension, it need not determine the pension’s present value.” Torian, 38 Va. App. at 177 , 562 S.E.2d at 30 -31 (citing Johnson v. Johnson, 25 Va. App. 368, 374 , 488 S.E.2d 659, 662 (1997)). -7- share of wife’s VRS pension, as with any other asset, rested within the sound discretion of the trial court, subject to the limitations of Code § 20-107.3(G) and upon consideration of the Code § 20-107.3(E) factors. | 1 | 1 |
Ranney v. Ranneygreen2 sentences2007How to divide the marital share of wife’s retirement account, “as with any other asset, rested within the sound discretion of the chancellor, subject to the limitations of Code § 20-107.3(G) and upon consideration of the Code § 20-107.3(E) factors.” Torian v. Torian, 38 Va. App. 167, 181 , 562 S.E.2d 355, 362 (2002). “[F]actors and circumstances leading to the dissolution of the marriage may be considered during equitable distribution -- even if those factors have no financial impact on the marriage -- as long as those factors detracted from the overall ‘marital partnership.’” Ranney v. Ranney 2007How to divide the marital share of wife’s retirement account, “as with any other asset, rested within the sound discretion of the chancellor, subject to the limitations of Code § 20-107.3(G) and upon consideration of the Code § 20-107.3(E) factors.” Torian v. Torian, 38 Va. App. 167, 181 , 562 S.E.2d 355, 362 (2002). “[F]actors and circumstances leading to the dissolution of the marriage may be considered during equitable distribution -- even if those factors have no financial impact on the marriage -- as long as those factors detracted from the overall ‘marital partnership.’” Ranney v. Ranney | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Smithgreen2 sentences2002See Smith, 18 Va. App. at 431 , 444 S.E.2d at 273 . 2002See Smith, 18 Va. App. at 431 , 444 S.E.2d at 273 . | 1 | 1 |
Theismann v. Theismanngreen2 sentences1998Cf. Theismann, 22 Va. App. at 565 , 471 S.E.2d at 812-13 . 1998Cf. Theismann, 22 Va. App. at 565 , 471 S.E.2d at 812-13 . | 1 | 1 |
Brinkley v. Brinkleygreen2 sentences1996See Brinkley v. Brinkley, 5 Va.App. 132, 136-37 , 361 S.E.2d 139, 140 (1987). 1996See Brinkley v. Brinkley, 5 Va.App. 132, 136-37 , 361 S.E.2d 139, 140 (1987). | 1 | 1 |
Sawyer v. Sawyergreen2 sentences1987See Code §§ 20-107.3(C) and (G); McGinnis, 1 Va. App. at 276 , 338 S.E.2d at 161 ; see also Sawyer, 1 Va. App. at 79 , 335 S.E.2d at 280 . 1987See Code §§ 20-107.3(C) and (G); McGinnis, 1 Va. App. at 276 , 338 S.E.2d at 161 ; see also Sawyer, 1 Va. App. at 79 , 335 S.E.2d at 280 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Barker v. Barker
green
2 sentences2002Barker, 27 Va. App. at 541 , 500 S.E.2d at 250 ; O ’Loughlin, 20 Va. App. at 528 , 458 S.E.2d at 326 . 11 For similar reasons, the Court rejects as insupportable the Commissioner’s failure to address in any detail the effect Tad Stephenson’s relationship with Watson had on his wife’s mental condition, a relevant consideration under § 20-107.3(E)(4). 2002Barker, 27 Va. App. at 541 , 500 S.E.2d at 250 ; O ’Loughlin, 20 Va. App. at 528 , 458 S.E.2d at 326 . 11 For similar reasons, the Court rejects as insupportable the Commissioner’s failure to address in any detail the effect Tad Stephenson’s relationship with Watson had on his wife’s mental condition, a relevant consideration under § 20-107.3(E)(4). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Gamble v. Gamble
green
2 sentences1993To ensure an equitable distribution of the marital wealth in accordance with Code § 20-107.3, the marital share of the pension must be initially determined in accordance with the statute and any award thereof “conditioned upon the specific limitations” and considerations of Code § 20-107.3(E), as well as any “Subsection (D) monetary award.” Gamble, 14 Va. App. at 570-71 , 421 S.E.2d at 642-43 . 1993To ensure an equitable distribution of the marital wealth in accordance with Code § 20-107.3, the marital share of the pension must be initially determined in accordance with the statute and any award thereof “conditioned upon the specific limitations” and considerations of Code § 20-107.3(E), as well as any “Subsection (D) monetary award.” Gamble, 14 Va. App. at 570-71 , 421 S.E.2d at 642-43 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
McGinnis v. McGinnis
green
2 sentences1987See Code §§ 20-107.3(C) and (G); McGinnis, 1 Va. App. at 276 , 338 S.E.2d at 161 ; see also Sawyer, 1 Va. App. at 79 , 335 S.E.2d at 280 . 1987See Code §§ 20-107.3(C) and (G); McGinnis, 1 Va. App. at 276 , 338 S.E.2d at 161 ; see also Sawyer, 1 Va. App. at 79 , 335 S.E.2d at 280 . | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.