Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 California opinions name it 1 courts 1985–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Roseleaf Corp. v. Chierighinogreen2 sentences2021(Roseleaf Corp. v. Chierighino (1963) 59 Cal.2d 35, 40 . . . .) Prior to 1933, a mortgagee was required to exhaust his or her security before proceeding directly against the mortgagor. 2012The junior’s right to recover should not be controlled by the whim of the senior, and there is no reason to extend the language of section 580d to reach that result.” (Roseleaf, supra, 59 Cal.2d at p. 44, italics added.) In the course of describing policy reasons why the fair market value limitations of sections 726 and 580a should not apply to a junior lienor seeking a deficiency judgment, Roseleaf added: “The position of a junior lienor whose security is lost through a senior sale is different from that of a selling senior lienor. | 2 | 3 |
Cornelison v. Kornbluthgreen2 sentences1998Section 580b provides in pertinent part: "No deficiency judgment shall he in any event ... under a deed of trust ... given to the vendor to secure payment of the balance of the purchase price of that real property..., or under a deed of trust ... on a dwelling for not more than four families given to a lender to secure repayment of a loan which was in fact used to pay all or part of the purchase price of that dwelling occupied, entirely or in part, by the purchaser." It was enacted in 1933 as part of a series of statutes, including the fair-market-value limitations of sections 726 and 580a, th 1998In Cornelison v. Kornbluth, supra, 15 Cal.3d at p. 601 , the court observed that “[i]n certain situations,” *319 the Legislature regarded deficiency judgments as being "too oppressive,” even when restricted by the fair-market-value limitations of sections 726 and 580a. | 2 | 3 |
Coppola v. Superior Courtgreen2 sentences1999The Court of Appeal concluded that the language of subdivision (b) required that the date of the actual foreclosure sale be used to value the property. “ ‘The method of sale is through the execution of a writ of sale. [Citations.] The sale is at auction to the highest bidder . . . and terminates upon acceptance of the last and highest bid or when the sale proceeds are sufficient to satisfy the money judgment (i.e., the debt). [Citation.] “ ‘If the sale proceeds are insufficient to satisfy the amount of the indebtedness, then the creditor may apply to the court within three months of the date o 1999The Court of Appeal concluded that the language of subdivision (b) required that the date of the actual foreclosure sale be used to value the property. “ ‘The method of sale is through the execution of a writ of sale. [Citations.] The sale is at auction to the highest bidder . . . and terminates upon acceptance of the last and highest bid or when the sale proceeds are sufficient to satisfy the money judgment (i.e., the debt). [Citation.] “ ‘If the sale proceeds are insufficient to satisfy the amount of the indebtedness, then the creditor may apply to the court within three months of the date o | 2 | 2 |
Younker v. Reseda Manorgreen2 sentences1998Section 580b provides in pertinent part: "No deficiency judgment shall he in any event ... under a deed of trust ... given to the vendor to secure payment of the balance of the purchase price of that real property..., or under a deed of trust ... on a dwelling for not more than four families given to a lender to secure repayment of a loan which was in fact used to pay all or part of the purchase price of that dwelling occupied, entirely or in part, by the purchaser." It was enacted in 1933 as part of a series of statutes, including the fair-market-value limitations of sections 726 and 580a, th 1998Section 580b provides in pertinent part: "No deficiency judgment shall he in any event ... under a deed of trust ... given to the vendor to secure payment of the balance of the purchase price of that real property..., or under a deed of trust ... on a dwelling for not more than four families given to a lender to secure repayment of a loan which was in fact used to pay all or part of the purchase price of that dwelling occupied, entirely or in part, by the purchaser." It was enacted in 1933 as part of a series of statutes, including the fair-market-value limitations of sections 726 and 580a, th | 1 | 2 |
Palm v. Schillinggreen2 sentences1998Section 580b provides in pertinent part: "No deficiency judgment shall he in any event ... under a deed of trust ... given to the vendor to secure payment of the balance of the purchase price of that real property..., or under a deed of trust ... on a dwelling for not more than four families given to a lender to secure repayment of a loan which was in fact used to pay all or part of the purchase price of that dwelling occupied, entirely or in part, by the purchaser." It was enacted in 1933 as part of a series of statutes, including the fair-market-value limitations of sections 726 and 580a, th 1998Section 580b provides in pertinent part: "No deficiency judgment shall he in any event ... under a deed of trust ... given to the vendor to secure payment of the balance of the purchase price of that real property..., or under a deed of trust ... on a dwelling for not more than four families given to a lender to secure repayment of a loan which was in fact used to pay all or part of the purchase price of that dwelling occupied, entirely or in part, by the purchaser." It was enacted in 1933 as part of a series of statutes, including the fair-market-value limitations of sections 726 and 580a, th | 1 | 2 |
Citrus State Bank v. McKendrickgreen2 sentences1998(Citrus State Bank v. McKendrick (1989) 215 Cal.App.3d 941, 949 [ 263 Cal.Rptr. 781 ].) The fair value provision of section 726 limits the size of the deficiency judgment. 1998(Citrus State Bank v. McKendrick (1989) 215 Cal.App.3d 941, 949 [ 263 Cal.Rptr. 781 ].) The fair value provision of section 726 limits the size of the deficiency judgment. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Shirokowgreen2 sentences1985(People v. Shirokow (1980) 26 Cal.3d 301, 306-307 [ 162 Cal.Rptr. 30 , 605 P.2d 859 ].) The fair value provision of Code of Civil Procedure section 726 is a product of the Great Depression. 1985(People v. Shirokow (1980) 26 Cal.3d 301, 306-307 [ 162 Cal.Rptr. 30 , 605 P.2d 859 ].) The fair value provision of Code of Civil Procedure section 726 is a product of the Great Depression. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
San Paolo U.S. Holding Co. v. 816 South Figueroa Co.
green
1 sentence1999The Court of Appeal concluded that the language of subdivision (b) required that the date of the actual foreclosure sale be used to value the property. “ ‘The method of sale is through the execution of a writ of sale. [Citations.] The sale is at auction to the highest bidder . . . and terminates upon acceptance of the last and highest bid or when the sale proceeds are sufficient to satisfy the money judgment (i.e., the debt). [Citation.] “ ‘If the sale proceeds are insufficient to satisfy the amount of the indebtedness, then the creditor may apply to the court within three months of the date o | 1 | 1999–1999 |
In Re Valenti
green
2 sentences1986Since the limitation provisions of section 1170.1, subdivision (g) are not applicable to adults convicted of multiple misdemeanors upon whom *550 consecutive sentences are imposed (In re Valenti (1986) 178 Cal.App.3d 470 [ 224 Cal.Rptr. 10 ]), this limitation is not apropos here. 1986Since the limitation provisions of section 1170.1, subdivision (g) are not applicable to adults convicted of multiple misdemeanors upon whom *550 consecutive sentences are imposed (In re Valenti (1986) 178 Cal.App.3d 470 [ 224 Cal.Rptr. 10 ]), this limitation is not apropos here. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.