Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1985–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Martin v. Davidgreen2 sentences2009See Martin v. David, 95-1411 (La.App. 3rd Cir.12/7/95), 666 So.2d 1136, 1137 . 2003See, Martin v. David, 95-1411 (La.App. 3d Cir.12/7/95), 666 So.2d 1136 , writ denied, 96-2184 (La.11/15/96), 682 So.2d 766 . | 2 | 2 |
Guste v. Demarsgreen1 sentence2009See Uniform Rules of Courts of Appeal, 2-12.4. [7] See also Guste v. Demars, 330 So.2d 123, 125 (La.App. 1st Cir.1976), wherein this court, noting the similarities between the UTPL and the federal statute, indicated that "we may and should consider interpretations of the Federal courts and of the Commission relative to such similar statutes to adjudge the scope and application of our own statute." [8] The Sherman Act was adopted to provide against combinations or conspiracies in restraint of trade or commerce, the monopolization of trade or commerce, or attempts to monopolize the same. | 1 | 1 |
Martin v. Davidgreen1 sentence2003See, Martin v. David, 95-1411 (La.App. 3d Cir.12/7/95), 666 So.2d 1136 , writ denied, 96-2184 (La.11/15/96), 682 So.2d 766 . | 1 | 1 |
Young v. Critton (In Re Young)green1 sentence1991When Mrs. Carroll and her husband filed their bankruptcy petition on February 22, 1984, an estate was created, comprised of, among other things, "all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property as of the commencement of the case." 11 U.S.C. § 541 (a); In re Young, 14 B.R. 809, 811 (N.D.Ill.1981). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ring Const., LLC v. Chateau Des Lions, LLC
green
2 sentences2017This court has held that “[t]he filing of a federal bankruptcy petition operates as an automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362 that prevents creditors from commencing or continuing judicial or administrative proceedings against the |9debtor.” Ring Const., LLC v. Chateau Des Lions, LLC, 05-568, p. 6 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/30/05), 918 So.2d 1172, 1176 , writ denied, 06-584 (La. 5/5/06), 927 So.2d 325 . 2009"The filing of a federal bankruptcy petition operates as an automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362 that prevents creditors from commencing or continuing judicial or administrative proceedings against the debtor." Ring Const., LLC v. Chateau Des Lions, LLC, 05-568 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/30/05) , 918 So.2d 1172, 1176 , writ denied, 06-0584 (La. 5/5/06), 927 So.2d 325 . | 2 | 2009–2017 |
Ring Construction, LLC v. Chateau Des Lions, LLC
neutral
2 sentences2017This court has held that “[t]he filing of a federal bankruptcy petition operates as an automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362 that prevents creditors from commencing or continuing judicial or administrative proceedings against the |9debtor.” Ring Const., LLC v. Chateau Des Lions, LLC, 05-568, p. 6 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/30/05), 918 So.2d 1172, 1176 , writ denied, 06-584 (La. 5/5/06), 927 So.2d 325 . 2009"The filing of a federal bankruptcy petition operates as an automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362 that prevents creditors from commencing or continuing judicial or administrative proceedings against the debtor." Ring Const., LLC v. Chateau Des Lions, LLC, 05-568 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/30/05) , 918 So.2d 1172, 1176 , writ denied, 06-0584 (La. 5/5/06), 927 So.2d 325 . | 2 | 2009–2017 |
Citizens Bank of Md. v. Strumpf
green
2 sentences2003Citizens Bank of Maryland v. Strumpf 516 U.S. 16 , 116 S.Ct. 286 , 138 L.Ed.2d 258 (1995). 2003Citizens Bank of Maryland v. Strumpf 516 U.S. 16 , 116 S.Ct. 286 , 138 L.Ed.2d 258 (1995). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Tranum v. Hebert
green
1 sentence1992Tranum v. Hebert, 581 So.2d 1023 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 584 So.2d 1169 (La.1991). [4] The automatic stay provision of 11 U.S.C.A. § 362 only applies to an action against a bankrupt; it does not apply to an action filed by a bankrupt against another. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Tranum v. Hebert
green
1 sentence1992Tranum v. Hebert, 581 So.2d 1023 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 584 So.2d 1169 (La.1991). [4] The automatic stay provision of 11 U.S.C.A. § 362 only applies to an action against a bankrupt; it does not apply to an action filed by a bankrupt against another. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Scarborough v. Duke
green
1 sentence1992Scarborough v. Duke, 532 So.2d 361 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1988). [5] Because we find that assignment of error 2 is without merit, it is unnecessary for us to address assignment of error 3 which asserts "[T]he District Court erred manifestly in granting defendants' Exceptions of No Cause of Action against Alemar Corp. as plaintiff Alemar Corp. has stated a cause of action under the provisions of C.C. art. 2292, et. seq." Further, Alemar and Shahla have not assigned error in the rulings in the January 22, 1991 judgment that (1) granted the motions to strike of Rayford, Gum and Antie to the supplementa | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Expressway Texaco Service v. Orgeron
neutral
1 sentence1991Expressway Texaco Service v. Orgeron, 517 So.2d 397 (La. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Village Savings Bank v. Town of Lewisboro (In Re Haight)
green
1 sentence1991The automatic stay provisions expressly apply to "all entities." The term "entity" includes a "governmental unit." 11 U.S.C. § 101 (14); In re Haight, 52 B.R. 104 (S.D.N.Y.1985). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Wedgeworth v. Fibreboard Corp.
green
1 sentence1985Wedgeworth v. Fibreboard Corp., 706 F.2d 541 (5th Cir.1983). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.