Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Reich v. Reichgreen1 sentence2016See Reich v. Reich, 605 N.E.2d 1178 , 1182- 83 (Ind. Ct. App. 1993) (reversing a finding of contempt where the automatic stay remained in effect). | 1 | 1 |
cluster 458639green1 sentence2007Id. at 179-80. | 1 | 1 |
Gianakas v. Gianakas (In Re Gianakas)green1 sentence2001(See also In Re Gianakas, 112 B.R. 737, 741 (W.D.Pa.1990); "The determination by the court below and by this Court that an obligation is in the nature of alimony, maintenance or support is the same inquiry whether the court is determining dis-chargeability of the debt or exemption from the automatic stay allowing the mov-ant to proceed against non-estate assets of the debtor.") We find the reasoning in this line of bankruptcy cases to be persuasive; thus, we disagree with Father's argument that contempt judgments based upon a visitation dispute would be dischargeable in bankruptey, thus making | 1 | 1 |
Holtz v. Poe (In Re Poe)green1 sentence2001In Re Jones, 9 F.3d at 881 , citing In Re Poe, 118 B.R. 809, 812 (Bankr.N.D.Ok1a.1990).") There are additional cases that apply this reasoning regarding debts in the nature of swpport directly to the stay provision in 11 U.S.C. § 362 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dyer v. Weedon
green
1 sentence2007Dyer, 769 S.W.2d at 713-14 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Jefferson Ward Stores, Inc. v. Doody Co.
green
1 sentence2007Id. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Job v. Calder (In re Calder)
green
1 sentence2001For cases concluding that such actions are void, see In re Soares (1997) 1st Cir., 107 F.3d 969 ; In re 48th Street Steakhouse, Inc. (1987) 2d Cir., 835 F.2d 427 , cert. denied; Raymark Indus. v. Lai (1992) 3d Cir., 973 F.2d 1125 ; In re Schwartz (1992) 9th Cir., 954 F.2d 569 ; In re Calder (1990) 10th Cir., 907 F.2d 953 ; and Borg Warner Acceptance Corps. v. Hall (1982) 11th Cir., 685 F.2d 1306 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Borg-Warner Acceptance Corporation v. Alvin Dewayne Hall and Beverly Jane Hall, A/K/A Beverly Jane Cantin
green
1 sentence2001For cases concluding that such actions are void, see In re Soares (1997) 1st Cir., 107 F.3d 969 ; In re 48th Street Steakhouse, Inc. (1987) 2d Cir., 835 F.2d 427 , cert. denied; Raymark Indus. v. Lai (1992) 3d Cir., 973 F.2d 1125 ; In re Schwartz (1992) 9th Cir., 954 F.2d 569 ; In re Calder (1990) 10th Cir., 907 F.2d 953 ; and Borg Warner Acceptance Corps. v. Hall (1982) 11th Cir., 685 F.2d 1306 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
48th Street Steakhouse, Inc. v. Rockefeller Group, Inc. (In re 48th Street Steakhouse, Inc.)
green
1 sentence2001For cases concluding that such actions are void, see In re Soares (1997) 1st Cir., 107 F.3d 969 ; In re 48th Street Steakhouse, Inc. (1987) 2d Cir., 835 F.2d 427 , cert. denied; Raymark Indus. v. Lai (1992) 3d Cir., 973 F.2d 1125 ; In re Schwartz (1992) 9th Cir., 954 F.2d 569 ; In re Calder (1990) 10th Cir., 907 F.2d 953 ; and Borg Warner Acceptance Corps. v. Hall (1982) 11th Cir., 685 F.2d 1306 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Easley v. Pettibone Michigan Corp.
green
2 sentences2001Examples of the minority view, that actions taken in violation of the automatic stay provisions of section 362 are merely voidable, include Sikes v. Global Marine, Inc. (1989) 5th Cir., 881 F.2d 176 , 178 and Easley v. Pettibone Michigan Corps. (1993) 6th Cir., 990 F.2d 905 , 910. 2001Examples of the minority view, that actions taken in violation of the automatic stay provisions of section 362 are merely voidable, include Sikes v. Global Marine, Inc. (1989) 5th Cir., 881 F.2d 176 , 178 and Easley v. Pettibone Michigan Corps. (1993) 6th Cir., 990 F.2d 905, 910 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Cohen v. Salata
green
2 sentences2001"The weight of Federal authority supports the conclusion that actions taken in violation of the automatic stay provisions of section 362 are void." Cohen v. Salata (1999) Ill.App., 303 Ill.App.3d 1060 , 237 Ill.Dec. 413 , 709 N.E.2d 668, 672 . 2001"The weight of Federal authority supports the conclusion that actions taken in violation of the automatic stay provisions of section 362 are void." Cohen v. Salata (1999) Ill.App., 303 Ill.App.3d 1060 , 237 Ill.Dec. 413 , 709 N.E.2d 668, 672 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
In Re Debbie Jean Jones, Debtor. Alvin Jones and John Mantooth v. Debbie Jean Jones
green
1 sentence2001In Re Jones, 9 F.3d at 881 , citing In Re Poe, 118 B.R. 809, 812 (Bankr.N.D.Ok1a.1990).") There are additional cases that apply this reasoning regarding debts in the nature of swpport directly to the stay provision in 11 U.S.C. § 362 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Robert A. Sikes and Janice K. Sikes v. Global Marine, Inc.
green
2 sentences2001Examples of the minority view, that actions taken in violation of the automatic stay provisions of section 362 are merely voidable, include Sikes v. Global Marine, Inc. (1989) 5th Cir., 881 F.2d 176 , 178 and Easley v. Pettibone Michigan Corps. (1993) 6th Cir., 990 F.2d 905 , 910. 2001Examples of the minority view, that actions taken in violation of the automatic stay provisions of section 362 are merely voidable, include Sikes v. Global Marine, Inc. (1989) 5th Cir., 881 F.2d 176 , 178 and Easley v. Pettibone Michigan Corps. (1993) 6th Cir., 990 F.2d 905, 910 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
In Re: Russell Schwartz Linda Schwartz, Debtors. Russell Schwartz Linda Schwartz v. United States
green
1 sentence2001For cases concluding that such actions are void, see In re Soares (1997) 1st Cir., 107 F.3d 969 ; In re 48th Street Steakhouse, Inc. (1987) 2d Cir., 835 F.2d 427 , cert. denied; Raymark Indus. v. Lai (1992) 3d Cir., 973 F.2d 1125 ; In re Schwartz (1992) 9th Cir., 954 F.2d 569 ; In re Calder (1990) 10th Cir., 907 F.2d 953 ; and Borg Warner Acceptance Corps. v. Hall (1982) 11th Cir., 685 F.2d 1306 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
In Re Bernard J. Peters, Debtor. Bernard J. Peters v. James A. Hennenhoeffer
green
1 sentence2001Id. at 9 . [See, e.g., In Re Peters, 964 F.2d 166 , 167 (2d Cir.1992) (per curiam).] Our reasoning in Spong therefore clearly indicates that the award of attorney's fees incurred in collecting alimony, maintenance or support falls within the exception to the automatic stay of section 362(b)(2). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Raymark Industries, Inc., Debtor-Appellant v. George Q. Lai
green
1 sentence2001For cases concluding that such actions are void, see In re Soares (1997) 1st Cir., 107 F.3d 969 ; In re 48th Street Steakhouse, Inc. (1987) 2d Cir., 835 F.2d 427 , cert. denied; Raymark Indus. v. Lai (1992) 3d Cir., 973 F.2d 1125 ; In re Schwartz (1992) 9th Cir., 954 F.2d 569 ; In re Calder (1990) 10th Cir., 907 F.2d 953 ; and Borg Warner Acceptance Corps. v. Hall (1982) 11th Cir., 685 F.2d 1306 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Soares v. Brockton Credit Union
green
1 sentence2001For cases concluding that such actions are void, see In re Soares (1997) 1st Cir., 107 F.3d 969 ; In re 48th Street Steakhouse, Inc. (1987) 2d Cir., 835 F.2d 427 , cert. denied; Raymark Indus. v. Lai (1992) 3d Cir., 973 F.2d 1125 ; In re Schwartz (1992) 9th Cir., 954 F.2d 569 ; In re Calder (1990) 10th Cir., 907 F.2d 953 ; and Borg Warner Acceptance Corps. v. Hall (1982) 11th Cir., 685 F.2d 1306 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
In Re Odd Lyngholm, Debtor. Michael Dean Chaussee v. Odd Lyngholm
green
1 sentence1995Lyngholom, 24 F.3d at 92 (quoting R. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Anglemyer v. United States
green
2 sentences1994See 11 U.S.C. § 523 (a)(1)(A); Anglemyer v. United States (D.Md.1990), 115 B.R. 510, 512 . 1994See 11 U.S.C. § 523 (a)(1)(A); Anglemyer v. United States (D.Md. 1990), 115 B.R. 510, 512 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
International Business Machines v. Fernstrom Storage & Van Co. (In re Fernstrom Storage & Van Co.)
green
1 sentence1994NOTES [1] By the same token, the Pages' reliance on In Matter of Shondel (7th Cir.1991), 950 F.2d 1301 , and In re Fernstrom Storage & Van Co. (7th Cir.1991), 938 F.2d 731 , is misplaced. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
In the Matter of Gladys E. Shondel, Debtor-Appellant
green
1 sentence1994NOTES [1] By the same token, the Pages' reliance on In Matter of Shondel (7th Cir.1991), 950 F.2d 1301 , and In re Fernstrom Storage & Van Co. (7th Cir.1991), 938 F.2d 731 , is misplaced. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Green v. Welsh
green
1 sentence1993Green v. Welsh (2d Cir.1992), 956 F.2d 30, 32 . 2 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
In Re Nita B. Smith, Debtor. Nita B. Smith, Cross-Appellant v. First America Bank, N.A., Cross-Appellee
green
2 sentences1993The Section 362 stay is broad in scope and “extends to virtually all formal and informal actions against property of the bankruptcy estate.” Id. 1993In re Smith (6th Cir.1989), 876 F.2d 524, 526 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Renges, Inc. v. PAC Financial Corp.
green
2 sentences1990The Court of Appeals correctly observed that acts which are taken in violation of the automatic stay provisions under 11 U.S.C. § 362 are deemed void and without effect, citing Renges, Inc. v. PAC Financial Corp. (1987), Ind. App., 515 N.E.2d 563 . 1990The Court of Appeals correctly observed that acts which are taken in violation of the automatic stay provisions under 11 U.S.C. § 362 are deemed void and without effect, citing Renges, Inc. v. PAC Financial Corp. (1987), Ind.App., 515 N.E.2d 563 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,689 in Re Globe Investment and Loan Company, Inc., Debtor. Giovanni B. Magnoni v. Globe Investment and Loan Company, Inc.
green
2 sentences1990However, the Court of Appeals also correctly observed that the automatic stay provision of the bankruptcy code was enacted solely for the benefit of the debtor's estate, citing In re Globe Investment and Loan Co. (9th Cir.1989), 867 F.2d 556 . 1990However, the Court of Appeals also correctly observed that the automatic stay provision of the bankruptcy code was enacted solely for the benefit of the debtor’s estate, citing In re Globe Investment and Loan Co. (9th Cir.1989), 867 F.2d 556 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.