Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 New York opinions name it 3 courts 2015–2024 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
NYCTL 2004-A Trust v. Archergreen2 sentences2024Said Defendants now move for dismissal of Plaintiff's complaint and any cross-claims against them, the prosecution not having resumed. " 'Generally, the death of a party divests a court of jurisdiction to act, and automatically stays proceedings in the action pending the substitution of a legal representative for the decedent pursuant to CPLR 1015 (a)' ( NYCTL 2004-A Trust v Archer , 131 AD3d 1213, 1214 [2015]; see CPLR 1015, 1021; Vicari v Kleinwaks , 157 AD3d 975 , 976 [2018])" ( Feurtado v Page , 163 AD3d 926 , 927 [2d Dept 2018]). 2024Said Defendants now move for dismissal of Plaintiff's complaint and any cross-claims against them, the prosecution not having resumed. " 'Generally, the death of a party divests a court of jurisdiction to act, and automatically stays proceedings in the action pending the substitution of a legal representative for the decedent pursuant to CPLR 1015 (a)' ( NYCTL 2004-A Trust v Archer , 131 AD3d 1213, 1214 [2015]; see CPLR 1015, 1021; Vicari v Kleinwaks , 157 AD3d 975 , 976 [2018])" ( Feurtado v Page , 163 AD3d 926 , 927 [2d Dept 2018]). | 6 | 8 |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Max Rosemberggreen2 sentences2022"Generally, the death of a party divests a court of jurisdiction to act, and automatically stays proceedings in the action pending the substitution of a legal representative for the decedent pursuant to CPLR 1015 (a)" ( NYCTL 2004-A Trust v Archer , 131 AD3d 1213, 1214 [2015]; see JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Rosemberg , 90 AD3d 713, 714 [2011]; Neuman v Neumann , 85 AD3d 1138, 1139 [2011]). 2019"Generally, the death of a party divests a court of jurisdiction to act, and automatically stays proceedings in the action pending the substitution of a legal representative for the decedent pursuant to CPLR 1015(a)" ( NYCTL 2004-A Trust v Archer , 131 AD3d 1213, 1214 ; see JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Rosemberg , 90 AD3d 713, 714 ; Neuman v Neumann , 85 AD3d 1138, 1139 ). | 4 | 5 |
Singer v. Riskingreen2 sentences2018As a general matter, "the death of a party divests a court of jurisdiction to act, and automatically stays proceedings in the action pending the substitution of a legal representative for that decedent pursuant to CPLR 1015(a)" ( NYCTL 2004-A Trust v Archer , 131 AD3d 1213, 1214 ; see CPLR 1015, 1021; Aurora Bank FSB v Albright , 137 AD3d 1177, 1178 ; U.S. Bank N.A. v Esses , 132 AD3d 847, 847-848 ; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Rosemberg , 90 AD3d 713, 714 ). "[A]ny determination rendered without such a substitution will generally be deemed a nullity" ( Singer v Riskin , 32 AD3d 839, 840 ; see 2016“Generally, the death of a party divests a court of jurisdiction to act, and automatically stays proceedings in the action pending the substitution of a legal representative for the decedent pursuant to CPLR 1015 (a)” (NYCTL 2004-A Trust v Archer, 131 AD3d 1213, 1214 [2015]; see CPLR 1015, 1021; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Rosemberg, 90 AD3d 713, 714 [2011]; Neuman v Neumann, 85 AD3d 1138, 1139 [2011]; Stancu v Cheon Hyang Oh, 74 AD3d 1322, 1322-1323 [2010]; Singer v Riskin, 32 AD3d 839, 839-840 [2006]). “[A]ny determination rendered without such substitution will generally be deemed a nullity | 4 | 5 |
Neuman v. Neumanngreen2 sentences2022"Generally, the death of a party divests a court of jurisdiction to act, and automatically stays proceedings in the action pending the substitution of a legal representative for the decedent pursuant to CPLR 1015 (a)" ( NYCTL 2004-A Trust v Archer , 131 AD3d 1213, 1214 [2015]; see JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Rosemberg , 90 AD3d 713, 714 [2011]; Neuman v Neumann , 85 AD3d 1138, 1139 [2011]). 2019"Generally, the death of a party divests a court of jurisdiction to act, and automatically stays proceedings in the action pending the substitution of a legal representative for the decedent pursuant to CPLR 1015(a)" ( NYCTL 2004-A Trust v Archer , 131 AD3d 1213, 1214 ; see JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Rosemberg , 90 AD3d 713, 714 ; Neuman v Neumann , 85 AD3d 1138, 1139 ). | 3 | 4 |
Stancu v. Cheon Hyang Ohgreen2 sentences2016“Generally, the death of a party divests a court of jurisdiction to act, and automatically stays proceedings in the action pending the substitution of a legal representative for the decedent pursuant to CPLR 1015 (a)” (NYCTL 2004-A Trust v Archer, 131 AD3d 1213, 1214 [2015]; see CPLR 1015, 1021; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Rosemberg, 90 AD3d 713, 714 [2011]; Neuman v Neumann, 85 AD3d 1138, 1139 [2011]; Stancu v Cheon Hyang Oh, 74 AD3d 1322, 1322-1323 [2010]; Singer v Riskin, 32 AD3d 839, 839-840 [2006]). “[A]ny determination rendered without such substitution will generally be deemed a nullity 2016“Generally, the death of a party divests a court of jurisdiction to act, and automatically stays proceedings in the action pending the substitution of a legal representative for the decedent pursuant to CPLR 1015 (a)” (NYCTL 2004-A Trust v Archer, 131 AD3d 1213, 1214 [2015]; see CPLR 1015, 1021; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Rosemberg, 90 AD3d 713, 714 [2011]; Neuman v Neumann, 85 AD3d 1138, 1139 [2011]; Stancu v Cheon Hyang Oh, 74 AD3d 1322, 1322-1323 [2010]; Singer v Riskin, 32 AD3d 839, 839-840 [2006]). “[A]ny determination rendered without such substitution will generally be deemed a nullity | 2 | 2 |
Bossert v. Ford Motor Co.green2 sentences2022"A motion for substitution pursuant to CPLR 1021 is the method by which the court acquires jurisdiction" over the deceased party's personal representative, and such a motion "is not a mere technicality" ( Bossert v Ford Motor Co. , 140 AD2d 480, 480 [1988]; see Singer v Riskin , 32 AD3d 839, 840 [2006]). 2019"A motion for substitution pursuant to CPLR 1021 is the method by which the court acquires jurisdiction" over the deceased party's personal representative, and such a motion "is not a mere technicality" ( Bossert v Ford Motor Co. , 140 AD2d 480, 480 ; see Singer v Riskin , 32 AD3d 839, 840 ). "[A]ny determination rendered without such substitution will generally be deemed a nullity" ( Singer v Riskin , 32 AD3d at 840 ; see NYCTL 2004-A Trust v Archer , 131 AD3d at 1214 ; JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Rosemberg , 90 AD3d at 714 ). | 1 | 2 |
Aurora Bank FSB v. Albrightgreen2 sentences2018As a general matter, "the death of a party divests a court of jurisdiction to act, and automatically stays proceedings in the action pending the substitution of a legal representative for that decedent pursuant to CPLR 1015(a)" ( NYCTL 2004-A Trust v Archer , 131 AD3d 1213, 1214 ; see CPLR 1015, 1021; Aurora Bank FSB v Albright , 137 AD3d 1177, 1178 ; U.S. Bank N.A. v Esses , 132 AD3d 847, 847-848 ; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Rosemberg , 90 AD3d 713, 714 ). "[A]ny determination rendered without such a substitution will generally be deemed a nullity" ( Singer v Riskin , 32 AD3d 839, 840 ; see 2018As a general matter, "the death of a party divests a court of jurisdiction to act, and automatically stays proceedings in the action pending the substitution of a legal representative for that decedent pursuant to CPLR 1015(a)" ( NYCTL 2004-A Trust v Archer , 131 AD3d 1213, 1214 ; see CPLR 1015, 1021; Aurora Bank FSB v Albright , 137 AD3d 1177, 1178 ; U.S. Bank N.A. v Esses , 132 AD3d 847, 847-848 ; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Rosemberg , 90 AD3d 713, 714 ). "[A]ny determination rendered without such a substitution will generally be deemed a nullity" ( Singer v Riskin , 32 AD3d 839, 840 ; see | 1 | 1 |
Rumola v. Maimonides Medical Centergreen1 sentence2015Ctr., 37 AD3d 696, 696-697 [2007]). “[A]ny determination rendered without such substitution will generally be deemed a nullity” (Singer v Riskin, 32 AD3d 839, 840 [2006]; see JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Rosemberg, 90 AD3d at 714 ; Stancu v Cheon Hyang Oh, 74 AD3d at 1322-1323 ). | 1 | 1 |
Abley Properties, Inc. v. Reidgreen1 sentence2015Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, and the order is vacated. *1214 Generally, the death of a party divests a court of jurisdiction to act, and automatically stays proceedings in the action pending the substitution of a legal representative for the decedent pursuant to CPLR 1015 (a) (see CPLR 1015, 1021; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Rosemberg, 90 AD3d 713, 714 [2011]; Neuman v Neumann, 85 AD3d 1138, 1139 [2011]; Stancu v Cheon Hyang Oh, 74 AD3d 1322, 1322-1323 [2010]; Reed v Grossi, 59 AD3d 509, 511 [2009]; Abley Props., Inc. v Reid, 52 AD3d 442, 443 [2008]; Ru | 1 | 1 |
Reed v. Grossigreen1 sentence2015Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, and the order is vacated. *1214 Generally, the death of a party divests a court of jurisdiction to act, and automatically stays proceedings in the action pending the substitution of a legal representative for the decedent pursuant to CPLR 1015 (a) (see CPLR 1015, 1021; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Rosemberg, 90 AD3d 713, 714 [2011]; Neuman v Neumann, 85 AD3d 1138, 1139 [2011]; Stancu v Cheon Hyang Oh, 74 AD3d 1322, 1322-1323 [2010]; Reed v Grossi, 59 AD3d 509, 511 [2009]; Abley Props., Inc. v Reid, 52 AD3d 442, 443 [2008]; Ru | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Esses
green
1 sentence2018As a general matter, "the death of a party divests a court of jurisdiction to act, and automatically stays proceedings in the action pending the substitution of a legal representative for that decedent pursuant to CPLR 1015(a)" ( NYCTL 2004-A Trust v Archer , 131 AD3d 1213, 1214 ; see CPLR 1015, 1021; Aurora Bank FSB v Albright , 137 AD3d 1177, 1178 ; U.S. Bank N.A. v Esses , 132 AD3d 847, 847-848 ; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Rosemberg , 90 AD3d 713, 714 ). "[A]ny determination rendered without such a substitution will generally be deemed a nullity" ( Singer v Riskin , 32 AD3d 839, 840 ; see | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.