section 23 adoption (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

section 23 adoption in Indiana

7 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
League of Women Voters of Indiana, Inc. v. Rokitagreen
ind · 2010 · cited in 3 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2013–2015
2 sentences

2015In Collins v. Day, 644 N.E.2d 72 (Ind.1994), our Supreme Court “engaged in a comprehensive review of the history and purposes animating the adoption of Section 23 as part of Indiana’s 1851 Constitution and of the subsequent case law, particularly our early decisions that were contemporaneous with its adoption and which were ‘accorded strong and superseding precedential value.’ ” League Of Women Voters of Ind., Inc. v. Rokita, 929 N.E.2d 758, 769 (Ind.2010) (quoting Collins, 644 N.E.2d at 77 ).

2013In Collins v. Day, 644 N.E.2d 72 (Ind. 1994), the Indiana Supreme Court “engaged in a comprehensive review of the history and purposes animating the adoption of Section 23 as part of Indiana’s 1851 Constitution and of the subsequent case law[.]” League of Women Voters of Ind. v. Rokita, 929 N.E.2d 758, 769 (Ind. 2010).

33

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Collins v. Day green
ind · 1994
2 sentences

2015In Collins v. Day, 644 N.E.2d 72 (Ind.1994), our Supreme Court “engaged in a comprehensive review of the history and purposes animating the adoption of Section 23 as part of Indiana’s 1851 Constitution and of the subsequent case law, particularly our early decisions that were contemporaneous with its adoption and which were ‘accorded strong and superseding precedential value.’ ” League Of Women Voters of Ind., Inc. v. Rokita, 929 N.E.2d 758, 769 (Ind.2010) (quoting Collins, 644 N.E.2d at 77 ).

2015In Collins v. Day, 644 N.E.2d 72 (Ind.1994), our Supreme Court “engaged in a comprehensive review of the history and purposes animating the adoption of Section 23 as part of Indiana’s 1851 Constitution and of the subsequent case law, particularly our early decisions that were contemporaneous with its adoption and which were ‘accorded strong and superseding precedential value.’ ” League Of Women Voters of Ind., Inc. v. Rokita, 929 N.E.2d 758, 769 (Ind.2010) (quoting Collins, 644 N.E.2d at 77 ).

62000–2015
In re Application of the Bank of Commerce green
ind · 1899
2 sentences

1994In re Application of the Bank of Commerce for Change of Name (1899), 153 Ind. 460 , 53 N.E. 950 .

1994In re Application of the Bank of Commerce for Change of Name (1899), 153 Ind. 460 , 53 N.E. 950 .

11994–1994

Where else courts name it

IN 7 (1994–2015) NY 3 (1912–1931)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check