Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 North Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 2000–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Alvarez v. Carlsongreen2 sentences2004Volz, at ¶ 11 (citing Kelly , at ¶ 19; Gietzen v. Gietzen, 1998 ND 70, ¶ 10 , 575 N.W.2d 924 ; Mosbrucker v. Mosbrucker, 1997 ND 72, ¶ 10 , 562 N.W.2d 390 ; Alvarez v. Carlson, 524 N.W.2d 584, 590 (N.D.1994)). 2004Volz, at ¶ 11 (citing Kelly , at ¶ 19; Gietzen v. Gietzen, 1998 ND 70, ¶ 10 , 575 N.W.2d 924 ; Mosbrucker v. Mosbrucker, 1997 ND 72, ¶ 10 , 562 N.W.2d 390 ; Alvarez v. Carlson, 524 N.W.2d 584, 590 (N.D.1994)). | 2 | 2 |
In Re Thompsongreen2 sentences2003See In re Thompson, 2003 ND 61, ¶ 7 , 659 N.W.2d 864 . 2003See In re Thompson, 2003 ND 61, ¶ 7 , 659 N.W.2d 864 . | 1 | 1 |
Kelly v. Kellygreen2 sentences2003See Kelly v. Kelly, 2002 ND 37, ¶ 19 , 640 N.W.2d 38; Gietzen v. Gietzen, 1998 ND 70, ¶ 10 , 575 N.W.2d 924 ; Mosbrucker v. Mosbrucker, 1997 ND 72, ¶ 10 , 562 N.W.2d 390 ; Alvarez v. Carlson, 524 N.W.2d 584, 590 (N.D.1994). 2003See Kelly v. Kelly, 2002 ND 37, ¶ 19 , 640 N.W.2d 38; Gietzen v. Gietzen, 1998 ND 70, ¶ 10 , 575 N.W.2d 924 ; Mosbrucker v. Mosbrucker, 1997 ND 72, ¶ 10 , 562 N.W.2d 390 ; Alvarez v. Carlson, 524 N.W.2d 584, 590 (N.D.1994). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Haag v. Haag
green
2 sentences2024Haag v. Haag, 2016 ND 34, ¶ 15 , 875 N.W.2d 539 . [¶10] The trial court was in the best position to determine whether these circumstances existed and whether they constituted a material change in circumstances under N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.6(6). 2024Haag v. Haag, 2016 ND 34, ¶ 15 , 875 N.W.2d 539 . [¶10] The trial court was in the best position to determine whether these circumstances existed and whether they constituted a material change in circumstances under N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.6(6). | 2 | 2024–2024 |
Gietzen v. Gietzen
green
2 sentences2004Volz, at ¶ 11 (citing Kelly , at ¶ 19; Gietzen v. Gietzen, 1998 ND 70, ¶ 10 , 575 N.W.2d 924 ; Mosbrucker v. Mosbrucker, 1997 ND 72, ¶ 10 , 562 N.W.2d 390 ; Alvarez v. Carlson, 524 N.W.2d 584, 590 (N.D.1994)). 2004Volz, at ¶ 11 (citing Kelly , at ¶ 19; Gietzen v. Gietzen, 1998 ND 70, ¶ 10 , 575 N.W.2d 924 ; Mosbrucker v. Mosbrucker, 1997 ND 72, ¶ 10 , 562 N.W.2d 390 ; Alvarez v. Carlson, 524 N.W.2d 584, 590 (N.D.1994)). | 2 | 2003–2004 |
Mosbrucker v. Mosbrucker
green
2 sentences2004Volz, at ¶ 11 (citing Kelly , at ¶ 19; Gietzen v. Gietzen, 1998 ND 70, ¶ 10 , 575 N.W.2d 924 ; Mosbrucker v. Mosbrucker, 1997 ND 72, ¶ 10 , 562 N.W.2d 390 ; Alvarez v. Carlson, 524 N.W.2d 584, 590 (N.D.1994)). 2004Volz, at ¶ 11 (citing Kelly , at ¶ 19; Gietzen v. Gietzen, 1998 ND 70, ¶ 10 , 575 N.W.2d 924 ; Mosbrucker v. Mosbrucker, 1997 ND 72, ¶ 10 , 562 N.W.2d 390 ; Alvarez v. Carlson, 524 N.W.2d 584, 590 (N.D.1994)). | 2 | 2003–2004 |
Volz v. Peterson
green
2 sentences2004Volz, 2003 ND 139, ¶ 13 , 667 N.W.2d 637 (citing Lanners v. Johnson, 2003 ND 61, ¶ 7 , 659 N.W.2d 864 ). 2004Volz, 2003 ND 139, ¶ 13 , 667 N.W.2d 637 (citing Lanners v. Johnson, 2003 ND 61, ¶ 7 , 659 N.W.2d 864 ). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
In the Interest of v. Johnson
green
2 sentences2004Volz, 2003 ND 139, ¶ 13 , 667 N.W.2d 637 (citing Lanners v. Johnson, 2003 ND 61, ¶ 7 , 659 N.W.2d 864 ). 2004Volz, 2003 ND 139, ¶ 13 , 667 N.W.2d 637 (citing Lanners v. Johnson, 2003 ND 61, ¶ 7 , 659 N.W.2d 864 ). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Selzler v. Selzler
green
2 sentences2002Only if the moving party succeeds in this showing will it be entitled to an evidentiary hearing to determine if “modification is necessary to serve the best interest of the child.” See N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.6(6)(b). [¶ 50] When viewed in the context of its relationship to N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.6(4), it is clear that the material change of circumstances requirement of N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.6(6)(a) must require something more of parties than the mere presentation of new facts “that were unknown to the moving party at the time the divorce decree was entered,” see Selzler, 2001 ND 138, ¶ 21 , 631 N.W.2d 2002Only if the moving party succeeds in this showing will it be entitled to an evidentiary hearing to determine if “modification is necessary to serve the best interest of the child.” See N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.6(6)(b). [¶ 50] When viewed in the context of its relationship to N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.6(4), it is clear that the material change of circumstances requirement of N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.6(6)(a) must require something more of parties than the mere presentation of new facts “that were unknown to the moving party at the time the divorce decree was entered,” see Selzler, 2001 ND 138, ¶ 21 , 631 N.W.2d | 1 | 2002–2002 |
In Re KMG
green
1 sentence2000Id. at 114 ; Rule 52(a), N.D.R.Civ.P. [¶ 5] The district court incorrectly made its finding under the significant or material change in circumstances analysis found in N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.6(6), rather than applying the more rigorous requirements of N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.6(l)-(5). | 1 | 2000–2000 |