section 1601 s inspection rights (California) · Go Syfert
← California issues

section 1601 s inspection rights in California

5 California opinions name it 1 courts 1990–2022 4 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in California.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Wolf v. CDS DEVCO green
calctapp · 2010
2 sentences

2021(See generally Wolf v. CDS Devco (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 903, 916 ; Havlicek v. Coast-to-Coast Analytical Services, Inc. (1995) 39 Cal.App.4th 1844, 1856 .) 39 make him whole created an individual injury, the court awarded Leonard damages based on the overall diminution in value to the Sage Automotive Group, not the amount Michael and Joseph owed Leonard from funds used to start a separately owned venture.

2021(See generally Wolf v. CDS Devco (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 903, 916 ; Havlicek v. Coast-to-Coast Analytical Services, Inc. (1995) 39 Cal.App.4th 1844, 1856 .) 39 make him whole created an individual injury, the court awarded Leonard damages based on the overall diminution in value to the Sage Automotive Group, not the amount Michael and Joseph owed Leonard from funds used to start a separately owned venture.

22021–2021
Havlicek v. Coast-To-Coast Analytical Services, Inc. green
calctapp · 1995
2 sentences

2021(See generally Wolf v. CDS Devco (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 903, 916 ; Havlicek v. Coast-to-Coast Analytical Services, Inc. (1995) 39 Cal.App.4th 1844, 1856 .) 39 make him whole created an individual injury, the court awarded Leonard damages based on the overall diminution in value to the Sage Automotive Group, not the amount Michael and Joseph owed Leonard from funds used to start a separately owned venture.

2021(See generally Wolf v. CDS Devco (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 903, 916 ; Havlicek v. Coast-to-Coast Analytical Services, Inc. (1995) 39 Cal.App.4th 1844, 1856 .) 39 make him whole created an individual injury, the court awarded Leonard damages based on the overall diminution in value to the Sage Automotive Group, not the amount Michael and Joseph owed Leonard from funds used to start a separately owned venture.

22021–2021
World Wide Imports, Inc. v. Bartel green
calctapp · 1983
1 sentence

2022Co. (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 192, 207 ; World Wide Imports, Inc. v. Bartel (1983) 145 Cal.App.3d 1006, 1011 .) And we must recognize “the preclusive effect of a judgment,” even where public policy argues against recognizing the “preclusive effect a statute has before final judgment is entered.” (LGCY Power, LLC v. Superior Court (2022) 75 Cal.App.5th 844 , 868-871 [full faith and credit clause does not compel application of sister state’s compulsory cross-complaint statute where related action remains pending in sister state].) Recognizing, as we must, that the Delaware Court of Chancery has fin

12022–2022
R.S. v. Pacificare Life & Health Insurance green
calctapp · 2011
1 sentence

2022Co. (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 192, 207 ; World Wide Imports, Inc. v. Bartel (1983) 145 Cal.App.3d 1006, 1011 .) And we must recognize “the preclusive effect of a judgment,” even where public policy argues against recognizing the “preclusive effect a statute has before final judgment is entered.” (LGCY Power, LLC v. Superior Court (2022) 75 Cal.App.5th 844 , 868-871 [full faith and credit clause does not compel application of sister state’s compulsory cross-complaint statute where related action remains pending in sister state].) Recognizing, as we must, that the Delaware Court of Chancery has fin

12022–2022
LGCY Power v. Super. Ct. green
calctapp · 2022
1 sentence

2022Co. (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 192, 207 ; World Wide Imports, Inc. v. Bartel (1983) 145 Cal.App.3d 1006, 1011 .) And we must recognize “the preclusive effect of a judgment,” even where public policy argues against recognizing the “preclusive effect a statute has before final judgment is entered.” (LGCY Power, LLC v. Superior Court (2022) 75 Cal.App.5th 844 , 868-871 [full faith and credit clause does not compel application of sister state’s compulsory cross-complaint statute where related action remains pending in sister state].) Recognizing, as we must, that the Delaware Court of Chancery has fin

12022–2022
People v. Greg F. green
cal · 2012
1 sentence

2021“The Legislature is presumed to be aware of all laws in existence when it passes or amends a statute. [Citations.] ‘ “The failure of the Legislature to change the law in a particular respect when the subject is generally before it and changes in other respects are made is indicative of an intent to leave the law as it stands in the aspects not amended.” [Citations.]’ ” (In re Greg F. (2012) 55 Cal.4th 393, 407 .) If the Legislature wanted to extend inspection rights under section 1601 to beneficial owners, it knew how to do so.

12021–2021
Schnabel v. Superior Court green
cal · 1993
1 sentence

2021Ramirez’s reliance on Schnabel v. Superior Court (1993) 5 Cal.4th 704 (Schnabel), a marital dissolution case, suggests nothing different.

12021–2021
Lisle v. Shipp green
calctapp · 1929
2 sentences

1990(See Lisle v. Shipp (1929) 96 Cal.App. 264 [ 273 P. 1103 ].) By inserting a holding company between respondent and Great Pacific, Great Pacific has insulated itself from the ordinary opportunities afforded shareholders to gain information about their companies.

1990(See Lisle v. Shipp (1929) 96 Cal.App. 264 [ 273 P. 1103 ].) By inserting a holding company between respondent and Great Pacific, Great Pacific has insulated itself from the ordinary opportunities afforded shareholders to gain information about their companies.

11990–1990

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CA § Cal. Corporations Code § 1601 (5)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check