Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 California opinions name it 1 courts 1965–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los Angelesred2 sentences2002The total effect of all this legislation was ... to create uniform fair labor practices . . . .” (Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1963) 60 Cal.2d 276, 294-295 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 830 , 384 P.2d 158 ], overruled on another point in Bishop v. City of San Jose (1969) 1 Cal.3d 56, 63, fn. 6 [81 CaLRptr. 465, 460 P.2d 137 ].) “The Legislature has expressly declared [in Labor Code section 923] that the public policy of California favors concerted activities of employees for the purpose of . . . mutual aid or protection.” (Schwartz-Torrance Investment Corp. v. Bakery & Confectione 2002The total effect of all this legislation was ... to create uniform fair labor practices . . . .” (Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1963) 60 Cal.2d 276, 294-295 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 830 , 384 P.2d 158 ], overruled on another point in Bishop v. City of San Jose (1969) 1 Cal.3d 56, 63, fn. 6 [81 CaLRptr. 465, 460 P.2d 137 ].) “The Legislature has expressly declared [in Labor Code section 923] that the public policy of California favors concerted activities of employees for the purpose of . . . mutual aid or protection.” (Schwartz-Torrance Investment Corp. v. Bakery & Confectione | 2 | 2 |
American Radio Assn. v. Superior Courtgreen2 sentences2002The total effect of all this legislation was ... to create uniform fair labor practices . . . .” (Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1963) 60 Cal.2d 276, 294-295 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 830 , 384 P.2d 158 ], overruled on another point in Bishop v. City of San Jose (1969) 1 Cal.3d 56, 63, fn. 6 [81 CaLRptr. 465, 460 P.2d 137 ].) “The Legislature has expressly declared [in Labor Code section 923] that the public policy of California favors concerted activities of employees for the purpose of . . . mutual aid or protection.” (Schwartz-Torrance Investment Corp. v. Bakery & Confectione 2002The total effect of all this legislation was ... to create uniform fair labor practices . . . .” (Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1963) 60 Cal.2d 276, 294-295 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 830 , 384 P.2d 158 ], overruled on another point in Bishop v. City of San Jose (1969) 1 Cal.3d 56, 63, fn. 6 [81 CaLRptr. 465, 460 P.2d 137 ].) “The Legislature has expressly declared [in Labor Code section 923] that the public policy of California favors concerted activities of employees for the purpose of . . . mutual aid or protection.” (Schwartz-Torrance Investment Corp. v. Bakery & Confectione | 1 | 2 |
Bishop v. City of San Josegreen2 sentences2002The total effect of all this legislation was ... to create uniform fair labor practices . . . .” (Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1963) 60 Cal.2d 276, 294-295 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 830 , 384 P.2d 158 ], overruled on another point in Bishop v. City of San Jose (1969) 1 Cal.3d 56, 63, fn. 6 [81 CaLRptr. 465, 460 P.2d 137 ].) “The Legislature has expressly declared [in Labor Code section 923] that the public policy of California favors concerted activities of employees for the purpose of . . . mutual aid or protection.” (Schwartz-Torrance Investment Corp. v. Bakery & Confectione 2002The total effect of all this legislation was ... to create uniform fair labor practices . . . .” (Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1963) 60 Cal.2d 276, 294-295 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 830 , 384 P.2d 158 ], overruled on another point in Bishop v. City of San Jose (1969) 1 Cal.3d 56, 63, fn. 6 [81 CaLRptr. 465, 460 P.2d 137 ].) “The Legislature has expressly declared [in Labor Code section 923] that the public policy of California favors concerted activities of employees for the purpose of . . . mutual aid or protection.” (Schwartz-Torrance Investment Corp. v. Bakery & Confectione | 1 | 1 |
People v. Krivdagreen1 sentence2002The total effect of all this legislation was ... to create uniform fair labor practices . . . .” (Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1963) 60 Cal.2d 276, 294-295 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 830 , 384 P.2d 158 ], overruled on another point in Bishop v. City of San Jose (1969) 1 Cal.3d 56, 63, fn. 6 [81 CaLRptr. 465, 460 P.2d 137 ].) “The Legislature has expressly declared [in Labor Code section 923] that the public policy of California favors concerted activities of employees for the purpose of . . . mutual aid or protection.” (Schwartz-Torrance Investment Corp. v. Bakery & Confectione | 1 | 1 |
Englund v. Chavezgreen1 sentence2002The total effect of all this legislation was ... to create uniform fair labor practices . . . .” (Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1963) 60 Cal.2d 276, 294-295 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 830 , 384 P.2d 158 ], overruled on another point in Bishop v. City of San Jose (1969) 1 Cal.3d 56, 63, fn. 6 [81 CaLRptr. 465, 460 P.2d 137 ].) “The Legislature has expressly declared [in Labor Code section 923] that the public policy of California favors concerted activities of employees for the purpose of . . . mutual aid or protection.” (Schwartz-Torrance Investment Corp. v. Bakery & Confectione | 1 | 1 |
Schwartz-Torrance Investment Corp. v. Bakery & Confectionery Workers' Uniongreen2 sentences2002The total effect of all this legislation was ... to create uniform fair labor practices . . . .” (Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1963) 60 Cal.2d 276, 294-295 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 830 , 384 P.2d 158 ], overruled on another point in Bishop v. City of San Jose (1969) 1 Cal.3d 56, 63, fn. 6 [81 CaLRptr. 465, 460 P.2d 137 ].) “The Legislature has expressly declared [in Labor Code section 923] that the public policy of California favors concerted activities of employees for the purpose of . . . mutual aid or protection.” (Schwartz-Torrance Investment Corp. v. Bakery & Confectione 2002The total effect of all this legislation was ... to create uniform fair labor practices . . . .” (Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1963) 60 Cal.2d 276, 294-295 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 830 , 384 P.2d 158 ], overruled on another point in Bishop v. City of San Jose (1969) 1 Cal.3d 56, 63, fn. 6 [81 CaLRptr. 465, 460 P.2d 137 ].) “The Legislature has expressly declared [in Labor Code section 923] that the public policy of California favors concerted activities of employees for the purpose of . . . mutual aid or protection.” (Schwartz-Torrance Investment Corp. v. Bakery & Confectione | 1 | 1 |
Holayter v. Smithgreen2 sentences1983Federal precedents can, however, serve as guidance by analogy. “[T]he language and policy of section 923 and other sections of our Labor Code are similar to that of the National Labor Relations Act ( 29 USC § 151 et seq.), and federal decisions in the field of labor-management relations are persuasive.” (American Radio Assn. v. Superior Court, supra, 237 Cal.App.2d 891, 897 .) “The parallel policies underlying section 923 and the corresponding federal statutes have led California courts to apply federal law doctrines in cases where no facts were alleged to bring the case under federal law.” (L 1983Federal precedents can, however, serve as guidance by analogy. “[T]he language and policy of section 923 and other sections of our Labor Code are similar to that of the National Labor Relations Act ( 29 USC § 151 et seq.), and federal decisions in the field of labor-management relations are persuasive.” (American Radio Assn. v. Superior Court, supra, 237 Cal.App.2d 891, 897 .) “The parallel policies underlying section 923 and the corresponding federal statutes have led California courts to apply federal law doctrines in cases where no facts were alleged to bring the case under federal law.” (L | 1 | 1 |
Lerma v. D'Arrigo Brothers Co.green2 sentences1983Federal precedents can, however, serve as guidance by analogy. “[T]he language and policy of section 923 and other sections of our Labor Code are similar to that of the National Labor Relations Act ( 29 USC § 151 et seq.), and federal decisions in the field of labor-management relations are persuasive.” (American Radio Assn. v. Superior Court, supra, 237 Cal.App.2d 891, 897 .) “The parallel policies underlying section 923 and the corresponding federal statutes have led California courts to apply federal law doctrines in cases where no facts were alleged to bring the case under federal law.” (L 1983Federal precedents can, however, serve as guidance by analogy. “[T]he language and policy of section 923 and other sections of our Labor Code are similar to that of the National Labor Relations Act ( 29 USC § 151 et seq.), and federal decisions in the field of labor-management relations are persuasive.” (American Radio Assn. v. Superior Court, supra, 237 Cal.App.2d 891, 897 .) “The parallel policies underlying section 923 and the corresponding federal statutes have led California courts to apply federal law doctrines in cases where no facts were alleged to bring the case under federal law.” (L | 1 | 1 |
Chavez v. Sargentred2 sentences1980Instead, it provides a corollary remedy where one of the unions is, by definition, not a union for jurisdictional strike purposes because it is financed, interfered with, or dominated by an employer. 4 Section 1122 thus reaches beyond the interunion rivalry context to give effect to *971 the policy of Labor Code section 923, 5 as recognized by Chavez v. Sargent (1959) 52 Cal.2d 162, 205 [ 339 P.2d 801 ] (disapproved on another point in Petri Cleaners, supra.) The language of Petri Cleaners does not compel a contrary conclusion. 1980Instead, it provides a corollary remedy where one of the unions is, by definition, not a union for jurisdictional strike purposes because it is financed, interfered with, or dominated by an employer. 4 Section 1122 thus reaches beyond the interunion rivalry context to give effect to *971 the policy of Labor Code section 923, 5 as recognized by Chavez v. Sargent (1959) 52 Cal.2d 162, 205 [ 339 P.2d 801 ] (disapproved on another point in Petri Cleaners, supra.) The language of Petri Cleaners does not compel a contrary conclusion. | 1 | 1 |
Bricklayers & Masons Union No. 1 v. Superior Courtgreen2 sentences1965(See Petri Cleaners, Inc. v. Automotive Employees etc. Local No. 88, 53 Cal.2d 455, 459-460 [ 2 Cal.Rptr. 470 , 349 P.2d 76 ]; Bricklayers & Masons Union No. 1 v. Superior Court, 216 Cal. App.2d 578, 586 [ 31 Cal.Rptr. 115 ].) We conclude that picketing by the union to maintain employment for its members is a legitimate objective of the union and is protected by the right of free speech. 1965(See Petri Cleaners, Inc. v. Automotive Employees etc. Local No. 88, 53 Cal.2d 455, 459-460 [ 2 Cal.Rptr. 470 , 349 P.2d 76 ]; Bricklayers & Masons Union No. 1 v. Superior Court, 216 Cal. App.2d 578, 586 [ 31 Cal.Rptr. 115 ].) We conclude that picketing by the union to maintain employment for its members is a legitimate objective of the union and is protected by the right of free speech. | 1 | 1 |
Petri Cleaners, Inc. v. Automotive Employees, Laundry Drivers & Helpers Local No. 88green2 sentences1965(See Petri Cleaners, Inc. v. Automotive Employees etc. Local No. 88, 53 Cal.2d 455, 459-460 [ 2 Cal.Rptr. 470 , 349 P.2d 76 ]; Bricklayers & Masons Union No. 1 v. Superior Court, 216 Cal. App.2d 578, 586 [ 31 Cal.Rptr. 115 ].) We conclude that picketing by the union to maintain employment for its members is a legitimate objective of the union and is protected by the right of free speech. 1965(See Petri Cleaners, Inc. v. Automotive Employees etc. Local No. 88, 53 Cal.2d 455, 459-460 [ 2 Cal.Rptr. 470 , 349 P.2d 76 ]; Bricklayers & Masons Union No. 1 v. Superior Court, 216 Cal. App.2d 578, 586 [ 31 Cal.Rptr. 115 ].) We conclude that picketing by the union to maintain employment for its members is a legitimate objective of the union and is protected by the right of free speech. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Knopf v. Producers Guild of America, Inc.
green
1 sentence1983Federal precedents can, however, serve as guidance by analogy. “[T]he language and policy of section 923 and other sections of our Labor Code are similar to that of the National Labor Relations Act ( 29 USC § 151 et seq.), and federal decisions in the field of labor-management relations are persuasive.” (American Radio Assn. v. Superior Court, supra, 237 Cal.App.2d 891, 897 .) “The parallel policies underlying section 923 and the corresponding federal statutes have led California courts to apply federal law doctrines in cases where no facts were alleged to bring the case under federal law.” (L | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.