Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1993–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc.red2 sentences2006The court in Gonzaga University v. Doe, supra, 536 U.S. 284 and n.3, cited Cannon v. University of Chicago, supra, 441 U.S. 690 -91 n.13, which provided other examples of statutory language conferring a right directly on a class of persons that included the plaintiff in that particular case: “Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, 396 U.S. 229, 238 [ 90 S. Ct. 400 , 24 L. 2006The court in Gonzaga University v. Doe, supra, 536 U.S. 284 and n.3, cited Cannon v. University of Chicago, supra, 441 U.S. 690 -91 n.13, which provided other examples of statutory language conferring a right directly on a class of persons that included the plaintiff in that particular case: “Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, 396 U.S. 229, 238 [ 90 S. Ct. 400 , 24 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Alden v. Maine
green
2 sentences2007Moreover, we disagree with the defendant’s argument that, in Alden v. Maine, 527 U.S. 706 , 119 S. Ct. 2240 , 144 L. 2007Moreover, we disagree with the defendant’s argument that, in Alden v. Maine, 527 U.S. 706 , 119 S. Ct. 2240 , 144 L. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Hankard v. Town of Avon
green
1 sentence2000In reaching its decisions, the district court stated, as to the § 1983 violation that "the defendants did not violate "a right secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States.'" (Citation omitted.) Hankard v. Town of Avon , supra, United States District Court, Docket No. 3:94CV1980 (AVC). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City
red
2 sentences1999As justification for striking the plaintiffs claim under § 1983, the court, relying on the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172, 195 , 105 S. Ct. 3108 , 87 L. 1999As justification for striking the plaintiffs claim under § 1983, the court, relying on the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172, 195 , 105 S. Ct. 3108 , 87 L. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Tedesco v. City of Stamford
green
2 sentences1993Tedesco v. Stamford, 215 Conn. 450, 456 , 576 A.2d 1273 (1990). 1993Tedesco v. Stamford, 215 Conn. 450, 456 , 576 A.2d 1273 (1990). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.