Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 2014–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State of Iowa v. Dantreon Levon Newmangreen1 sentence2023Barnes’s challenge to the sentencing procedure amounts to “a claim on appeal for which an appellate court potentially could provide relief.” See State v. Newman, 970 N.W.2d 866 , 869 (Iowa 2022) (“[W]e have recognized a defendant establishes good cause to appeal by asserting a challenge to a sentencing hearing or sentence because a defendant need not preserve error to assert such claims on appeal.”). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Schminkeygreen1 sentence2017We also reject Barnes’s claim that there was not sufficient evidence that he intended to permanently deprive the owner of the truck, negating a finding the 15 property was “stolen.” It is true that for purposes of theft as defined in section 714.1(1), which states that a person commits theft when the person “[t]akes possession or control of the property of another, or property in the possession of another, with the intent to deprive the other thereof.” See State v. Schminkey, 597 N.W.2d 785, 788-89 (Iowa 1999). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Ramirezgreen1 sentence2014See State v. Ramirez, 400 N.W.2d 586, 590 (Iowa 1987) (affirming sentence where the record demonstrated the court considered more than one permissible sentencing consideration). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State of Iowa v. Scott Randolph Luke
green
1 sentence2025But there is also the principle that “the oral colloquy and the written sentencing order may be combined to determine whether sufficient reasons [for consecutive sentences] have been given.” State v. Luke, 4 N.W.3d 450 , 458 (Iowa 2024). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Manning v. State
green
1 sentence2017Those rules provide that summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Manning, 654 N.W.2d at 560 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.