Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1961–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kanefield v. SP DISTRIBUTING CO., LLCgreen1 sentence2014Co., 25 S.W.3d 492, 498 (Mo. App. E.D. 2000)). 24 Analysis Mid-Continent filed a motion for leave to amend its answer on September 17, 2012, less than two months before the November 5, 2012 trial on the Association's claim for equitable garnishment. | 1 | 1 |
Blevins v. Barry-Lawrence County Ass'n for Retarded Citizensgreen1 sentence2004See supra. In Blevins , homeowners sought to enjoin the Blevins from operating a group home for the retarded. 707 S.W.2d at 407 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Marcia Green v. Mehrdad Fotoohighiam
green
1 sentence2024The 1 On April 21, 2023, the trial court issued an order and judgment granting the Association’s motion for summary judgment, and on April 26, 2023, it issued a separate order and judgment granting the City’s motion for summary judgment. 2 “When reviewing the entry of summary judgment, we view the record in the light most favorable to the party against whom the judgment was entered and accord the non-movant all reasonable inferences from the record.” Show-Me Inst. v. Off. of Admin., 645 S.W.3d 602 , 604 n.2 (Mo. App. W.D. 2022) (citing Green v. Fotoohighiam, 606 S.W.3d 113 , 116 (Mo. banc 2020 | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Show-Me Institute v. Office of Administration, Brandi Caruthers, American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees Council 61, and Danny Homan
green
1 sentence2024The 1 On April 21, 2023, the trial court issued an order and judgment granting the Association’s motion for summary judgment, and on April 26, 2023, it issued a separate order and judgment granting the City’s motion for summary judgment. 2 “When reviewing the entry of summary judgment, we view the record in the light most favorable to the party against whom the judgment was entered and accord the non-movant all reasonable inferences from the record.” Show-Me Inst. v. Off. of Admin., 645 S.W.3d 602 , 604 n.2 (Mo. App. W.D. 2022) (citing Green v. Fotoohighiam, 606 S.W.3d 113 , 116 (Mo. banc 2020 | 1 | 2024–2024 |
American Polled Hereford Ass'n v. City of Kansas City
green
1 sentence1982This cause comes here on transfer from the Court of Appeals, Western District, 617 S.W.2d 128 . | 1 | 1982–1982 |
State v. Kaufman
green
2 sentences1961As was pointed out in State v. Kaufman, supra, even though the drawer of a check pays it within five days after-receiving notice of its dishonor, such payment does not constitute a defense to the charge. 1961State v. Taylor, 335 Mo. 460 , 73 S.W.2d 378 , 95 A.L.R. 476 ; State v. Kaufman, supra. Lastly, the mere fact that the defendant had $10 in his savings account with the Association was not a. defense. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
State v. Taylor
green
2 sentences1961State v. Taylor, 335 Mo. 460 , 73 S.W.2d 378 , 95 A.L.R. 476 ; State v. Kaufman, supra. Lastly, the mere fact that the defendant had $10 in his savings account with the Association was not a. defense. 1961State v. Taylor, 335 Mo. 460 , 73 S.W.2d 378 , 95 A.L.R. 476 ; State v. Kaufman, supra. Lastly, the mere fact that the defendant had $10 in his savings account with the Association was not a. defense. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.