defenses claim (Missouri) · Go Syfert
← Missouri issues

defenses claim in Missouri

5 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1920–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Norwine v. Norwinegreen
moctapp · 2001 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
1 sentence

2002As recounted in Norwine v. Norwine, 46 S.W.3d 673, 674 (Mo.App.2001)(“Norwme /”), this case started when Ruth Julia Norwine (“Plaintiff’) sued Susan Elaine Norwine (“Susan”) as personal representative of Sam Norwine’s (“Sam”) estate and as sucessor trastee under Sam’s revocable trust.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Ferri v. Ackerman green
scotus · 1979
2 sentences

2019“For when state law creates a cause of action, the State is free to define the defenses to that claim, including the defense of immunity ….” Id. at 198 .

2010The United States Supreme Court has left the question of immunity to the states, noting that “when state law creates a cause of action, the State is free to define the defenses to that claim, including the defense of immunity, unless, of course, the state rule is in conflict with federal law.” Fern v. Ackerman, 444 U.S. 193, 198 , 100 S.Ct. 402, 406 , 62 L.Ed.2d 355 (1979).

22010–2019
Tower v. Glover green
scotus · 1984
2 sentences

2010In Tower v. Glover, 467 U.S. 914 , 104 S.Ct. 2820 , 81 L.Ed.2d 758 (1984), while holding that public defenders have no immunity from § 1983 liability for intentional conspiratorial misconduct, the Supreme Court observed that the states may well provide immunity to public defenders against tort claims arising under state law and may even provide protection for intentional acts.

2010In Tower v. Glover, 467 U.S. 914 , 104 S.Ct. 2820 , 81 L.Ed.2d 758 (1984), while holding that public defenders have no immunity from § 1983 liability for intentional conspiratorial misconduct, the Supreme Court observed that the states may well provide immunity to public defenders against tort claims arising under state law and may even provide protection for intentional acts.

12010–2010
Neville v. D'Oench green
mo · 1931
2 sentences

1940They are affirmative defenses and must be specially pleaded. [Neville v. D’Oench, 327 Mo. 34 , 34 S. W. (2d) 491 .] This general rule is applicable here because no waiver or estoppel is disclosed in appellant’s own evidence.

1940They are affirmative defenses and must be specially pleaded. [Neville v. D’Oench, 327 Mo. 34 , 34 S. W. (2d) 491 .] This general rule is applicable here because no waiver or estoppel is disclosed in appellant’s own evidence.

11940–1940
Riney v. Hill green
mo · 1851
1 sentence

1920Christy v. Donegan, 94 Mo. 66 , 6 S. W. 693 ; James v. Hiatt, 80 Mo. App. 43 ; Call v. Moll, 89 Mo. App. 386 ; Sutton v. Libby, 201 S. W. 615 ; Riney v. Hill, 14 Mo. 500 , 55 Am.

11920–1920
State ex rel. Christy v. Donegan neutral
mo · 1887
1 sentence

1920Christy v. Donegan, 94 Mo. 66 , 6 S. W. 693 ; James v. Hiatt, 80 Mo. App. 43 ; Call v. Moll, 89 Mo. App. 386 ; Sutton v. Libby, 201 S. W. 615 ; Riney v. Hill, 14 Mo. 500 , 55 Am.

11920–1920
James v. Hiatt neutral
moctapp · 1899
1 sentence

1920Christy v. Donegan, 94 Mo. 66 , 6 S. W. 693 ; James v. Hiatt, 80 Mo. App. 43 ; Call v. Moll, 89 Mo. App. 386 ; Sutton v. Libby, 201 S. W. 615 ; Riney v. Hill, 14 Mo. 500 , 55 Am.

11920–1920
Call v. Moll neutral
moctapp · 1901
1 sentence

1920Christy v. Donegan, 94 Mo. 66 , 6 S. W. 693 ; James v. Hiatt, 80 Mo. App. 43 ; Call v. Moll, 89 Mo. App. 386 ; Sutton v. Libby, 201 S. W. 615 ; Riney v. Hill, 14 Mo. 500 , 55 Am.

11920–1920

Where else courts name it

TX 21 (1963–2026) IL 13 (1975–2019) CA 11 (1964–2022) NY 10 (1916–2012) AL 7 (1974–2018) UT 5 (1985–2023) PA 5 (1971–2022) MO 5 (1920–2019) FL 5 (1939–2018) CT 4 (1992–2019) WA 4 (1974–2015) AR 3 (2007–2023) OH 3 (1999–2021) TN 3 (2001–2005) NJ 3 (1948–2020) NV 3 (2015–2015) LA 3 (1983–2003) OR 3 (1975–2015) OK 3 (1947–1998) WV 3 (1966–2010) IN 2 (1973–2001) MD 2 (2015–2015) HI 2 (1942–1987) CO 2 (2002–2004) MI 2 (1952–1993) AZ 2 (1956–1987) SC 2 (1932–1976)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check