Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1911–1949 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Labbe v. Corbett
green
2 sentences1949Where such fraud is established, the writing purporting to be a contract is declared invalid, since the defrauded party never agreed to the terms thereof.” In Labbe v. Corbett, 69 Tex. 503 , 6 S.W. 808, 811 , the Supreme Court said that the„ rule asserted in an early English case is the true rule: “When once it is established that there has been any fraudulent misrepresentation * * * by which a person has been induced to enter into a contract, it is no answer to his claim to be relieved from it to tell him that he might have known the truth by proper inquiry. 1949Where such fraud is established, the writing purporting to be a contract is declared invalid, since the defrauded party never agreed to the terms thereof.” In Labbe v. Corbett, 69 Tex. 503 , 6 S.W. 808, 811 , the Supreme Court said that the„ rule asserted in an early English case is the true rule: “When once it is established that there has been any fraudulent misrepresentation * * * by which a person has been induced to enter into a contract, it is no answer to his claim to be relieved from it to tell him that he might have known the truth by proper inquiry. | 4 | 1931–1949 |
Buchanan v. Burnett and Wife
green
2 sentences1935It is a familiar, rule that in a suit founded on fraud and deceit, the wrongdoer will not be heard to say in his defense that plaintiff “might have known the truth by proper inquiry.” Labbe v. Corbett, 69 Tex. 503 , 6 S.W. 808, 811 ; Buchanan v. Burnett, 102 Tex. 492 , 119 S. W. 1141 , 132 Am. 1935It is a familiar, rule that in a suit founded on fraud and deceit, the wrongdoer will not be heard to say in his defense that plaintiff “might have known the truth by proper inquiry.” Labbe v. Corbett, 69 Tex. 503 , 6 S.W. 808, 811 ; Buchanan v. Burnett, 102 Tex. 492 , 119 S. W. 1141 , 132 Am. | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Younge v. Harris' Administrator
green
1 sentence1911Boyce v. Grundy, 3 Pet., 210 ; Younge v. Harris, 2 Ala., 108 ; Clopton v. Cogart, 13 Smed. & Mar., 363; Connersville v. Wadleigh, 7 Blackf., 102 ; Anderson v. Burnett, 5 How. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Boyce's Executors v. Grundy
green
1 sentence1911Boyce v. Grundy, 3 Pet., 210 ; Younge v. Harris, 2 Ala., 108 ; Clopton v. Cogart, 13 Smed. & Mar., 363; Connersville v. Wadleigh, 7 Blackf., 102 ; Anderson v. Burnett, 5 How. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
President of Connersville v. Wadleigh
neutral
1 sentence1911Boyce v. Grundy, 3 Pet., 210 ; Younge v. Harris, 2 Ala., 108 ; Clopton v. Cogart, 13 Smed. & Mar., 363; Connersville v. Wadleigh, 7 Blackf., 102 ; Anderson v. Burnett, 5 How. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.