section 18.2-308.2 mandatory punishment (Virginia) · Go Syfert
← Virginia issues

section 18.2-308.2 mandatory punishment in Virginia

5 Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
United States v. Douglas Lee Dunford, Sr.green
ca4 · 1998 · cited in 1 Virginia opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
1 sentence

2019See generally Dunford, 148 F.3d at 389-99 (holding that ammunition stored with firearms supported only one conviction of illegal possession of “any firearm or ammunition”).

11
Frias v. Commonwealthgreen
vactapp · 2000 · cited in 1 Virginia opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003“Interpretations that ‘rewrite statutes’ are not permitted.” Johnson v. Commonwealth, 37 Va.App. 634, 640 , 561 S.E.2d 1, 4 (2002) (quoting Frias v. Commonwealth, 34 Va.App. 193, 199 , 538 S.E.2d 374, 376 (2000)). *585 Mouberry also argues that § 18.2-14 conflicts with the trial court’s construction of the punishment provisions of § 18.2-308.2(A).

2003“Interpretations that ‘rewrite statutes’ are not permitted.” Johnson v. Commonwealth, 37 Va.App. 634, 640 , 561 S.E.2d 1, 4 (2002) (quoting Frias v. Commonwealth, 34 Va.App. 193, 199 , 538 S.E.2d 374, 376 (2000)). *585 Mouberry also argues that § 18.2-14 conflicts with the trial court’s construction of the punishment provisions of § 18.2-308.2(A).

11
Johnson v. Commonwealthgreen
vactapp · 2002 · cited in 1 Virginia opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003“Interpretations that ‘rewrite statutes’ are not permitted.” Johnson v. Commonwealth, 37 Va.App. 634, 640 , 561 S.E.2d 1, 4 (2002) (quoting Frias v. Commonwealth, 34 Va.App. 193, 199 , 538 S.E.2d 374, 376 (2000)). *585 Mouberry also argues that § 18.2-14 conflicts with the trial court’s construction of the punishment provisions of § 18.2-308.2(A).

2003“Interpretations that ‘rewrite statutes’ are not permitted.” Johnson v. Commonwealth, 37 Va.App. 634, 640 , 561 S.E.2d 1, 4 (2002) (quoting Frias v. Commonwealth, 34 Va.App. 193, 199 , 538 S.E.2d 374, 376 (2000)). *585 Mouberry also argues that § 18.2-14 conflicts with the trial court’s construction of the punishment provisions of § 18.2-308.2(A).

11
Shinault v. Commonwealthgreen
va · 1984 · cited in 1 Virginia opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
2 sentences

2002Shinault v. Commonwealth, 228 Va. 269, 271 , 321 S.E.2d 652, 654 (1984). “[I]f a person may be convicted of an offense under another jurisdiction’s statute for conduct which might not result in a conviction under [the Virginia Code], the statutes are not “ ‘substantially conforming.’ ” Cox v. Commonwealth, 13 Va.App. 328, 330-31 , 411 S.E.2d 444, 446 (1991). 4 *861 The prior conviction in issue here resulted from a violation of Article 130, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 930 (1998), which proscribes “unlawful[ ] ent[ry] [into] the building or structure of another with intent to commit a criminal offense th

2002Shinault v. Commonwealth, 228 Va. 269, 271 , 321 S.E.2d 652, 654 (1984). “[I]f a person may be convicted of an offense under another jurisdiction’s statute for conduct which might not result in a conviction under [the Virginia Code], the statutes are not “ ‘substantially conforming.’ ” Cox v. Commonwealth, 13 Va.App. 328, 330-31 , 411 S.E.2d 444, 446 (1991). 4 *861 The prior conviction in issue here resulted from a violation of Article 130, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 930 (1998), which proscribes “unlawful[ ] ent[ry] [into] the building or structure of another with intent to commit a criminal offense th

11
Cox v. Commonwealthgreen
vactapp · 1991 · cited in 1 Virginia opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
2 sentences

2002Shinault v. Commonwealth, 228 Va. 269, 271 , 321 S.E.2d 652, 654 (1984). “[I]f a person may be convicted of an offense under another jurisdiction’s statute for conduct which might not result in a conviction under [the Virginia Code], the statutes are not “ ‘substantially conforming.’ ” Cox v. Commonwealth, 13 Va.App. 328, 330-31 , 411 S.E.2d 444, 446 (1991). 4 *861 The prior conviction in issue here resulted from a violation of Article 130, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 930 (1998), which proscribes “unlawful[ ] ent[ry] [into] the building or structure of another with intent to commit a criminal offense th

2002Shinault v. Commonwealth, 228 Va. 269, 271 , 321 S.E.2d 652, 654 (1984). “[I]f a person may be convicted of an offense under another jurisdiction’s statute for conduct which might not result in a conviction under [the Virginia Code], the statutes are not “ ‘substantially conforming.’ ” Cox v. Commonwealth, 13 Va.App. 328, 330-31 , 411 S.E.2d 444, 446 (1991). 4 *861 The prior conviction in issue here resulted from a violation of Article 130, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 930 (1998), which proscribes “unlawful[ ] ent[ry] [into] the building or structure of another with intent to commit a criminal offense th

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Acey v. Commonwealth green
vactapp · 1999
1 sentence

2020The Court based its holding in Groffel on the reasoning from this Court’s earlier decision in Acey v. Commonwealth, 29 Va. App. 240 (1999).

12020–2020
Carter v. Commonwealth green
vactapp · 2002
2 sentences

2006Appellant next argues the trial court erred by sentencing him pursuant to the mandatory punishment provision of Code § 18.2-308.2 because it does not apply to adjudications of delinquency.2 Our decision in Carter v. Commonwealth, 38 Va. App. 116 , 562 S.E.2d 331 (2002), controls the disposition of this issue.

2006Appellant next argues the trial court erred by sentencing him pursuant to the mandatory punishment provision of Code § 18.2-308.2 because it does not apply to adjudications of delinquency.2 Our decision in Carter v. Commonwealth, 38 Va. App. 116 , 562 S.E.2d 331 (2002), controls the disposition of this issue.

12006–2006

Statutes the citing opinions construe

VA § Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-308.2 (5) VA § Va. Code Ann. § 17.1-805 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check