Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1948–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Boothbygreen1 sentence2021See State v. Boothby, 310 Kan 619, 626- 27, 448 P.3d 416 (2019) (recognizing and applying doctrine of judicial comment error as distinct from judicial misconduct). | 1 | 1 |
Wright v. Kansas Water Officegreen1 sentence2001See Wright, 255 Kan. at 997-99 (liability under the KSCA is a liability “created by statute”). | 1 | 1 |
Prickett v. Hawkeye-Security Insurancegreen1 sentence1987That general rule applies with particular force to an ambiguous or *456 doubtful provision in a policy or in an endorsement attached thereto which attempts to exclude from coverage liability in certain circumstances. [Citations omitted.] And as a concomitant to that rule, it is held in Kansas that if an insurer intends to restrict its coverage, it should use language clearly stating its purpose. [Citations omitted.]” Prickett v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance Company, 282 F.2d 294, 301 (10th Cir. 1960). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Charlene Hassler v. Circle C Resources
green
1 sentence2022Hassler v. Circle C Resources, 505 P.3d 169 , 173-74 (Wyo. 2022). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Lively v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
green
2 sentences1948In Lively v. Railway Co., 115 Kan. 784 , 225 Pac. 103 , it was not entirely clear whether the plaintiff sought damages at common law or under the federal employers’ liability act. 1948In Lively v. Railway Co., 115 Kan. 784 , 225 Pac. 103 , it was not entirely clear whether the plaintiff sought damages at common law or under the federal employers’ liability act. | 1 | 1948–1948 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.