Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1984–2024 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
John Sampson v. the University of Texas at Austingreen2 sentences2022See Sampson, 500 S.W.3d at 388 ; Halstead, 2022 WL 678277 , at *4; City of Houston v. Ayala, 628 S.W.3d 615 , 625-26 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2021, no pet.). 2022See Sampson, 500 S.W.3d at 388 ; Halstead, 2022 WL 678277 , at *4; City of Houston v. Ayala, 628 S.W.3d 615 , 625-26 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2021, no pet.). | 3 | 3 |
Ken Hoagland v. Bill Butcher, Kari Butcher, Butcher & Butcher, and OCTV Partners, LLCgreen2 sentences2022Paradigm Oil, Inc. v. Retamco Operating, Inc., 372 S.W.3d 177, 182 (Tex. 2012); Hoagland v. Butcher, 474 S.W.3d 802, 809 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2014, no pet.). 2022Paradigm Oil, Inc. v. Retamco Operating, Inc., 372 S.W.3d 177, 182 (Tex. 2012); Hoagland v. Butcher, 474 S.W.3d 802, 809 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2014, no pet.). | 2 | 2 |
Paradigm Oil, Inc. v. Retamco Operating, Inc.green2 sentences2022Paradigm Oil, Inc. v. Retamco Operating, Inc., 372 S.W.3d 177, 182 (Tex. 2012); Hoagland v. Butcher, 474 S.W.3d 802, 809 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2014, no pet.). 2022Paradigm Oil, Inc. v. Retamco Operating, Inc., 372 S.W.3d 177, 182 (Tex. 2012); Hoagland v. Butcher, 474 S.W.3d 802, 809 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2014, no pet.). | 2 | 2 |
Eric L. Hill v. Stategreen2 sentences2024In other words, the gravamen of the continuous sexual abuse statute is “not the individual bad acts, but . . . the commission of any combination of any two of those acts during the requisite time period.” Id. 2024PENAL CODE ANN. § 21.02(d) (“If the jury is the trier of fact, members of the jury are not required to agree unanimously on which specific acts of sexual abuse were committed by the defendant or the exact date when those acts were committed.”). “[I]t is sufficient to allow a jury to select from a menu of possible bad acts and agree that a defendant committed two of them without the concomitant requirement that the jurors be shown to all concur as to which of the acts did occur.” Hill v. State, 455 S.W.3d 271, 276 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2015, pet. ref’d). | 1 | 1 |
Great Dane Trailers, Inc. v. Estate of Wellsgreen1 sentence2010See Great Dane Trailers, 52 S.W.3d at 743 ; see also Graber v. Fuqua, 279 S.W.3d 608, 611-12 (Tex.2009) (applying the presumption when deciding if the federal bankruptcy regime preempted a state malicious prosecution claim). [15] NHTSA had promulgated a safety standard requiring trucks using air brakes to stop within certain distances. | 1 | 1 |
Graber v. Fuquagreen1 sentence2010See Great Dane Trailers, 52 S.W.3d at 743 ; see also Graber v. Fuqua, 279 S.W.3d 608, 611-12 (Tex.2009) (applying the presumption when deciding if the federal bankruptcy regime preempted a state malicious prosecution claim). [15] NHTSA had promulgated a safety standard requiring trucks using air brakes to stop within certain distances. | 1 | 1 |
Simmons v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1984In Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377, 384 , 88 S.Ct. 967, 971 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247, 1253 (1968) the Supreme Court prescribed the test in this regard, stating: ... convictions based on eyewitness identification at trial following a pretrial identification by photograph will be set aside on that ground only if the photographic identification procedure was so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification. 1984In Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377, 384 , 88 S.Ct. 967, 971 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247, 1253 (1968) the Supreme Court prescribed the test in this regard, stating: ... convictions based on eyewitness identification at trial following a pretrial identification by photograph will be set aside on that ground only if the photographic identification procedure was so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rodriquez v. State
green
2 sentences1988Valdez v. State, 566 S.W.2d 463 (Tex.Cr.App.1977); Duran v. State, 552 S.W.2d 840 (Tex.Cr.App.1977); Rodriguez v. State, 534 S.W.2d 335 (Tex.Cr.App.1976). 1986In Rodriquez v. State, 534 S.W.2d 335 (Tex.Cr.App.1976), Judge Odom, characterized such error as fundamental and wrote: “A careful reading of the statute [Article 1.15, supra] reveals that although the stipulated evidence may be either oral or written, the agreement to stipulate and the concomitant waiver must be executed in writing. | 3 | 1986–1988 |
City of Houston v. Lourdes N. Ayala
green
2 sentences2022See Sampson, 500 S.W.3d at 388 ; Halstead, 2022 WL 678277 , at *4; City of Houston v. Ayala, 628 S.W.3d 615 , 625-26 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2021, no pet.). 2022See Sampson, 500 S.W.3d at 388 ; Halstead, 2022 WL 678277 , at *4; City of Houston v. Ayala, 628 S.W.3d 615 , 625-26 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2021, no pet.). | 2 | 2022–2022 |
Valdez v. State
green
2 sentences1988Valdez v. State, 555 S.W.2d 463 (Tex.Cr.App. 1977); Duran v. State, 552 S.W.2d 840 (Tex.Cr.App.1977); Rodriguez v. State, 534 S.W.2d 335 (Tex.Cr.App.1976). 1987Valdez v. State, 555 S.W.2d 463 (Tex. Crim.App.1977); Rodriquez v. State, 534 S.W.2d 335 (Tex.Crim.App.1976). | 2 | 1987–1988 |
Duran v. State
green
2 sentences1988Valdez v. State, 566 S.W.2d 463 (Tex.Cr.App.1977); Duran v. State, 552 S.W.2d 840 (Tex.Cr.App.1977); Rodriguez v. State, 534 S.W.2d 335 (Tex.Cr.App.1976). 1988Valdez v. State, 555 S.W.2d 463 (Tex.Cr.App. 1977); Duran v. State, 552 S.W.2d 840 (Tex.Cr.App.1977); Rodriguez v. State, 534 S.W.2d 335 (Tex.Cr.App.1976). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.